Brandon J Herrington, Jennifer C Urquhart, Parham Rasoulinejad, Fawaz Siddiqi, Kevin Gurr, Christopher S Bailey
{"title":"与头孢唑林相比,万古霉素抗生素预防增加脊柱手术后手术部位感染的风险。","authors":"Brandon J Herrington, Jennifer C Urquhart, Parham Rasoulinejad, Fawaz Siddiqi, Kevin Gurr, Christopher S Bailey","doi":"10.1177/21925682251341833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective analysis of randomized controlled trial.ObjectivesSurgical site infection (SSI) after spine surgery has severe negative health and financial consequences. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is a routinely used method to prevent SSIs in the spine patient population. The most commonly used antibiotic is cefazolin, with vancomycin often being substituted in the case of penicillin or cephalosporin allergy. Vancomycin as SAP has been associated with increased SSI in the joint replacement literature, but this is not yet well defined in the spinal surgery population. The purpose of this study was to determine whether vancomycin SAP compared to cefazolin SAP is associated with increased risk of SSI.Methods535 patients, aged 16 years or older, underwent elective multi-level open posterior spinal fusion surgery at the thoracic, thoracolumbar, or lumbar levels. Demographic and operative characteristics as well as post-operative outcomes were compared between the following groups: (1) noninfected-cefazolin, (2) noninfected-vancomycin, (3) infected-cefazolin, and (4) infected-vancomycin. Primary outcomes were superficial and complicated (deep and organ/space) infections.ResultsThe following risk factors for SSI were identified in a logistic regression analysis: vancomycin (OR 2.498, 95% CI, 1.085-5.73, <i>P</i> = 0.031), increasing operating time (OR 1.006, 95% CI, 1.001-1.010 <i>P</i> = 0.010), weight (OR 1.020, 95% CI 1.006-1.034, <i>P</i> = 0.005), revision procedure (OR 2.343, 95% CI 1.283-4.277, <i>P</i> = 0.006), and depression (OR 2.366, 95% CI 1.284-4.360, <i>P</i> = 0.006).ConclusionsIn open posterior approach spinal fusion surgery, vancomycin SAP is associated with increased risk of infection compared to cefazolin SAP.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251341833"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12061899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vancomycin Antibiotic Prophylaxis Compared to Cefazolin Increases Risk of Surgical Site Infection Following Spine Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Brandon J Herrington, Jennifer C Urquhart, Parham Rasoulinejad, Fawaz Siddiqi, Kevin Gurr, Christopher S Bailey\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21925682251341833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective analysis of randomized controlled trial.ObjectivesSurgical site infection (SSI) after spine surgery has severe negative health and financial consequences. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is a routinely used method to prevent SSIs in the spine patient population. The most commonly used antibiotic is cefazolin, with vancomycin often being substituted in the case of penicillin or cephalosporin allergy. Vancomycin as SAP has been associated with increased SSI in the joint replacement literature, but this is not yet well defined in the spinal surgery population. The purpose of this study was to determine whether vancomycin SAP compared to cefazolin SAP is associated with increased risk of SSI.Methods535 patients, aged 16 years or older, underwent elective multi-level open posterior spinal fusion surgery at the thoracic, thoracolumbar, or lumbar levels. Demographic and operative characteristics as well as post-operative outcomes were compared between the following groups: (1) noninfected-cefazolin, (2) noninfected-vancomycin, (3) infected-cefazolin, and (4) infected-vancomycin. Primary outcomes were superficial and complicated (deep and organ/space) infections.ResultsThe following risk factors for SSI were identified in a logistic regression analysis: vancomycin (OR 2.498, 95% CI, 1.085-5.73, <i>P</i> = 0.031), increasing operating time (OR 1.006, 95% CI, 1.001-1.010 <i>P</i> = 0.010), weight (OR 1.020, 95% CI 1.006-1.034, <i>P</i> = 0.005), revision procedure (OR 2.343, 95% CI 1.283-4.277, <i>P</i> = 0.006), and depression (OR 2.366, 95% CI 1.284-4.360, <i>P</i> = 0.006).ConclusionsIn open posterior approach spinal fusion surgery, vancomycin SAP is associated with increased risk of infection compared to cefazolin SAP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"21925682251341833\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12061899/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251341833\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251341833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究设计:随机对照试验回顾性分析。目的脊柱手术后手术部位感染(SSI)具有严重的负面健康和经济后果。外科抗生素预防(SAP)是预防脊柱患者ssi的常规方法。最常用的抗生素是头孢唑林,在青霉素或头孢菌素过敏的情况下,万古霉素常被取代。在关节置换术文献中,万古霉素作为SAP与SSI增加有关,但这在脊柱手术人群中尚未得到很好的定义。本研究的目的是确定万古霉素SAP与头孢唑林SAP相比是否与SSI风险增加相关。方法:s535例16岁及以上的患者在胸椎、胸腰椎或腰椎行择期多段开放后路脊柱融合术。比较以下两组患者的人口学、手术特征及术后结果:(1)未感染头孢唑林组,(2)未感染万古霉素组,(3)感染头孢唑林组,(4)感染万古霉素组。主要结局是浅表和复杂(深部和器官/空间)感染。结果logistic回归分析确定了SSI的以下危险因素:万古霉素(OR 2.498, 95% CI, 1.085 ~ 5.73, P = 0.031)、手术时间延长(OR 1.006, 95% CI, 1.001 ~ 1.010 P = 0.010)、体重(OR 1.020, 95% CI 1.006 ~ 1.034, P = 0.005)、翻修程序(OR 2.343, 95% CI 1.283 ~ 4.277, P = 0.006)、抑郁(OR 2.366, 95% CI 1.284 ~ 4.360, P = 0.006)。结论在开放性后路脊柱融合手术中,万古霉素SAP与头孢唑林SAP相比,感染风险增加。
Vancomycin Antibiotic Prophylaxis Compared to Cefazolin Increases Risk of Surgical Site Infection Following Spine Surgery.
Study DesignRetrospective analysis of randomized controlled trial.ObjectivesSurgical site infection (SSI) after spine surgery has severe negative health and financial consequences. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is a routinely used method to prevent SSIs in the spine patient population. The most commonly used antibiotic is cefazolin, with vancomycin often being substituted in the case of penicillin or cephalosporin allergy. Vancomycin as SAP has been associated with increased SSI in the joint replacement literature, but this is not yet well defined in the spinal surgery population. The purpose of this study was to determine whether vancomycin SAP compared to cefazolin SAP is associated with increased risk of SSI.Methods535 patients, aged 16 years or older, underwent elective multi-level open posterior spinal fusion surgery at the thoracic, thoracolumbar, or lumbar levels. Demographic and operative characteristics as well as post-operative outcomes were compared between the following groups: (1) noninfected-cefazolin, (2) noninfected-vancomycin, (3) infected-cefazolin, and (4) infected-vancomycin. Primary outcomes were superficial and complicated (deep and organ/space) infections.ResultsThe following risk factors for SSI were identified in a logistic regression analysis: vancomycin (OR 2.498, 95% CI, 1.085-5.73, P = 0.031), increasing operating time (OR 1.006, 95% CI, 1.001-1.010 P = 0.010), weight (OR 1.020, 95% CI 1.006-1.034, P = 0.005), revision procedure (OR 2.343, 95% CI 1.283-4.277, P = 0.006), and depression (OR 2.366, 95% CI 1.284-4.360, P = 0.006).ConclusionsIn open posterior approach spinal fusion surgery, vancomycin SAP is associated with increased risk of infection compared to cefazolin SAP.
期刊介绍:
Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).