基于智能手机的信息传递对学术医疗中心实习生和护士的影响:观察性研究

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Sankirth Madabhushi, Andrew M Nguyen, Katie Hsia, Sucharita Kher, William Harvey, Jennifer Murzycki, Daniel Chandler, Michael Davis
{"title":"基于智能手机的信息传递对学术医疗中心实习生和护士的影响:观察性研究","authors":"Sankirth Madabhushi, Andrew M Nguyen, Katie Hsia, Sucharita Kher, William Harvey, Jennifer Murzycki, Daniel Chandler, Michael Davis","doi":"10.2196/66859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital communication between nurses and medicine interns plays a crucial role in patient care. However, excessive messaging may contribute to alert fatigue, potentially affecting workflow efficiency and clinical decision-making. Although prior research has examined general messaging behaviors among clinicians, few studies have specifically analyzed messaging patterns between nurses and interns, who serve as primary points of contact in inpatient care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to quantitatively characterize messaging patterns between the primary nurse and primary provider (ie, medicine intern) of hospitalized patients at an academic medical center in order to identify communication burdens and potential inefficiencies. By identifying trends in message volume, timing, and response rates, we seek to inform strategies to optimize communication workflows and mitigate alert fatigue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At a large academic hospital (Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA), we analyzed secure messaging transactions between internal medicine interns and nurses across three medical-surgical units over 6 months. Transaction metadata, time stamps, and unique message tokens were extracted. Data processing was performed using Python, Microsoft Excel, and R. Message volume, interaction frequencies, and response times were analyzed using measures of central tendency and statistical tests of significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 61,057 unique messages were exchanged between interns and nurses, with interns exchanging 2.5 times more messages per day with nurses than vice versa (P<.001). Messaging volume exhibited diurnal variation, indicating periods of increased communication burden. Interns read messages from nurses within a median of 35 (range: 0-3589) seconds, whereas nurses read messages from interns within a median of 26 (range: 0-3584) seconds (P<.001). The longest message response delays occurred at 4 AM, whereas the shortest occurred at 8 AM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interns experience a significantly higher messaging burden than nurses, with distinct peaks in message volume during morning rounds and overnight shifts. These findings suggest a need for interventions such as optimized digital communication protocols to reduce nonessential messaging and alert fatigue. Future research should explore the effectiveness of these interventions in enhancing workflow efficiency and the development of both in-person and digital interventions to optimize communication workflows and mitigate alert fatigue.</p>","PeriodicalId":56334,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Informatics","volume":"13 ","pages":"e66859"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12021371/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Smartphone-Based Messaging on Interns and Nurses at an Academic Medical Center: Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sankirth Madabhushi, Andrew M Nguyen, Katie Hsia, Sucharita Kher, William Harvey, Jennifer Murzycki, Daniel Chandler, Michael Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/66859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital communication between nurses and medicine interns plays a crucial role in patient care. However, excessive messaging may contribute to alert fatigue, potentially affecting workflow efficiency and clinical decision-making. Although prior research has examined general messaging behaviors among clinicians, few studies have specifically analyzed messaging patterns between nurses and interns, who serve as primary points of contact in inpatient care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to quantitatively characterize messaging patterns between the primary nurse and primary provider (ie, medicine intern) of hospitalized patients at an academic medical center in order to identify communication burdens and potential inefficiencies. By identifying trends in message volume, timing, and response rates, we seek to inform strategies to optimize communication workflows and mitigate alert fatigue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At a large academic hospital (Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA), we analyzed secure messaging transactions between internal medicine interns and nurses across three medical-surgical units over 6 months. Transaction metadata, time stamps, and unique message tokens were extracted. Data processing was performed using Python, Microsoft Excel, and R. Message volume, interaction frequencies, and response times were analyzed using measures of central tendency and statistical tests of significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 61,057 unique messages were exchanged between interns and nurses, with interns exchanging 2.5 times more messages per day with nurses than vice versa (P<.001). Messaging volume exhibited diurnal variation, indicating periods of increased communication burden. Interns read messages from nurses within a median of 35 (range: 0-3589) seconds, whereas nurses read messages from interns within a median of 26 (range: 0-3584) seconds (P<.001). The longest message response delays occurred at 4 AM, whereas the shortest occurred at 8 AM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interns experience a significantly higher messaging burden than nurses, with distinct peaks in message volume during morning rounds and overnight shifts. These findings suggest a need for interventions such as optimized digital communication protocols to reduce nonessential messaging and alert fatigue. Future research should explore the effectiveness of these interventions in enhancing workflow efficiency and the development of both in-person and digital interventions to optimize communication workflows and mitigate alert fatigue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Medical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"e66859\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12021371/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Medical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/66859\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/66859","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:护士与医学实习生之间的数字化沟通在患者护理中起着至关重要的作用。然而,过多的信息传递可能会导致警觉疲劳,潜在地影响工作流程效率和临床决策。虽然先前的研究已经检查了临床医生之间的一般信息传递行为,但很少有研究专门分析护士和实习生之间的信息传递模式,他们是住院病人护理的主要接触点。目的:本研究旨在定量表征学术医疗中心住院患者的初级护士和初级提供者(即医学实习生)之间的信息传递模式,以确定沟通负担和潜在的低效率。通过确定消息量、时间和响应率的趋势,我们寻求通知策略以优化通信工作流程并减轻警报疲劳。方法:在一家大型学术医院(Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA),我们分析了三个内科外科单位的内科实习生和护士在6个月内的安全信息交易。提取了事务元数据、时间戳和唯一消息令牌。使用Python、Microsoft Excel和r进行数据处理。使用集中趋势和显著性统计检验对消息量、交互频率和响应时间进行分析。结果:实习生与护士之间共交换了61,057条唯一信息,实习生与护士之间每天的信息交换量是护士的2.5倍(p结论:实习生的信息负担明显高于护士,在早查房和夜班期间的信息量明显达到高峰。这些发现表明,有必要采取干预措施,如优化数字通信协议,以减少不必要的信息传递和警报疲劳。未来的研究应探索这些干预措施在提高工作流程效率方面的有效性,并开发面对面和数字干预措施,以优化沟通工作流程并减轻警报疲劳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Smartphone-Based Messaging on Interns and Nurses at an Academic Medical Center: Observational Study.

Background: Digital communication between nurses and medicine interns plays a crucial role in patient care. However, excessive messaging may contribute to alert fatigue, potentially affecting workflow efficiency and clinical decision-making. Although prior research has examined general messaging behaviors among clinicians, few studies have specifically analyzed messaging patterns between nurses and interns, who serve as primary points of contact in inpatient care.

Objectives: This study aims to quantitatively characterize messaging patterns between the primary nurse and primary provider (ie, medicine intern) of hospitalized patients at an academic medical center in order to identify communication burdens and potential inefficiencies. By identifying trends in message volume, timing, and response rates, we seek to inform strategies to optimize communication workflows and mitigate alert fatigue.

Methods: At a large academic hospital (Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA), we analyzed secure messaging transactions between internal medicine interns and nurses across three medical-surgical units over 6 months. Transaction metadata, time stamps, and unique message tokens were extracted. Data processing was performed using Python, Microsoft Excel, and R. Message volume, interaction frequencies, and response times were analyzed using measures of central tendency and statistical tests of significance.

Results: A total of 61,057 unique messages were exchanged between interns and nurses, with interns exchanging 2.5 times more messages per day with nurses than vice versa (P<.001). Messaging volume exhibited diurnal variation, indicating periods of increased communication burden. Interns read messages from nurses within a median of 35 (range: 0-3589) seconds, whereas nurses read messages from interns within a median of 26 (range: 0-3584) seconds (P<.001). The longest message response delays occurred at 4 AM, whereas the shortest occurred at 8 AM.

Conclusions: Interns experience a significantly higher messaging burden than nurses, with distinct peaks in message volume during morning rounds and overnight shifts. These findings suggest a need for interventions such as optimized digital communication protocols to reduce nonessential messaging and alert fatigue. Future research should explore the effectiveness of these interventions in enhancing workflow efficiency and the development of both in-person and digital interventions to optimize communication workflows and mitigate alert fatigue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Informatics
JMIR Medical Informatics Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
173
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Medical Informatics (JMI, ISSN 2291-9694) is a top-rated, tier A journal which focuses on clinical informatics, big data in health and health care, decision support for health professionals, electronic health records, ehealth infrastructures and implementation. It has a focus on applied, translational research, with a broad readership including clinicians, CIOs, engineers, industry and health informatics professionals. Published by JMIR Publications, publisher of the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), the leading eHealth/mHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175), JMIR Med Inform has a slightly different scope (emphasizing more on applications for clinicians and health professionals rather than consumers/citizens, which is the focus of JMIR), publishes even faster, and also allows papers which are more technical or more formative than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信