超声引导下胸下肋间平面入路与胸锯肌平面入路治疗臂后内侧肋臂间神经阻滞的比较——一项随机对照试验。

IF 2.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-16 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_990_24
Selvakumar Kingslin Appadurai, S V Bini, Melvin Cyriac
{"title":"超声引导下胸下肋间平面入路与胸锯肌平面入路治疗臂后内侧肋臂间神经阻滞的比较——一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Selvakumar Kingslin Appadurai, S V Bini, Melvin Cyriac","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_990_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN), along with the brachial plexus, supplies the medial and posterior aspects of the upper arm. This study hypothesised that ultrasound blockade of ICBN by subpectoral intercostal plane block may provide faster and complete blockade compared to the pectoserratus plane block.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty patients were randomised into two groups, and initially, an ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed. After 10 min, Group A received a subpectoral intercostal plane block at the second rib. Group B received a pectoserratus plane block at the fourth rib. Anaesthesia over the posterior and medial aspects of the upper arm was assessed. The primary outcome was the time of onset of the blockade. The secondary outcome was the time taken to perform the block and the block failure rate. Student's <i>t</i>-test was used to compare the means. The categorical variables were compared using the Chi-squared test. Significance was defined by a <i>P</i> value of <0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time of onset of the block over the medial and posterior sides of the arm was significantly faster in Group A. Time taken for administering block in Group B was more than twice that of Group A (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The block was 100% successful in Group A, while in Group B, only 70% was successful.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The subpectoral intercostal plane block at the second rib produces a faster and more complete blockade of ICBN in all patients compared to the pectoserratus plane block at the fourth rib.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"69 5","pages":"477-482"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12068428/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between ultrasound-guided subpectoral intercostal plane approach and pectoserratus plane approach for intercostobrachial nerve block in surgeries involving posterior and medial aspects of the arm - A randomised comparative trial.\",\"authors\":\"Selvakumar Kingslin Appadurai, S V Bini, Melvin Cyriac\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ija.ija_990_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN), along with the brachial plexus, supplies the medial and posterior aspects of the upper arm. This study hypothesised that ultrasound blockade of ICBN by subpectoral intercostal plane block may provide faster and complete blockade compared to the pectoserratus plane block.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty patients were randomised into two groups, and initially, an ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed. After 10 min, Group A received a subpectoral intercostal plane block at the second rib. Group B received a pectoserratus plane block at the fourth rib. Anaesthesia over the posterior and medial aspects of the upper arm was assessed. The primary outcome was the time of onset of the blockade. The secondary outcome was the time taken to perform the block and the block failure rate. Student's <i>t</i>-test was used to compare the means. The categorical variables were compared using the Chi-squared test. Significance was defined by a <i>P</i> value of <0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time of onset of the block over the medial and posterior sides of the arm was significantly faster in Group A. Time taken for administering block in Group B was more than twice that of Group A (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The block was 100% successful in Group A, while in Group B, only 70% was successful.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The subpectoral intercostal plane block at the second rib produces a faster and more complete blockade of ICBN in all patients compared to the pectoserratus plane block at the fourth rib.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"69 5\",\"pages\":\"477-482\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12068428/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_990_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_990_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:肋臂间神经(ICBN)与臂丛一起支配上臂内侧和后部。本研究假设,与胸锯肌平面阻滞相比,胸下肋间平面阻滞对ICBN的超声阻断可能提供更快、更完全的阻断。方法:60例患者随机分为两组,首先进行超声引导的锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞。10min后,A组在第二肋处进行胸下肋间平面阻滞。B组在第四肋骨处行胸锯肌平面阻滞。评估上臂后部和内侧的麻醉情况。主要结果是封锁开始的时间。次要结果是执行阻塞所需的时间和阻塞故障率。使用学生t检验比较均值。分类变量比较采用卡方检验。结果的P值定义了意义:a组在手臂内侧和后侧阻滞的开始时间明显更快,B组阻滞的时间是a组的两倍多(P < 0.001)。A组区块100%成功,而B组只有70%成功。结论:与位于第四肋骨的胸锯肌平面阻滞相比,位于第二肋骨的胸下肋间平面阻滞在所有患者中都能更快、更完全地阻断ICBN。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between ultrasound-guided subpectoral intercostal plane approach and pectoserratus plane approach for intercostobrachial nerve block in surgeries involving posterior and medial aspects of the arm - A randomised comparative trial.

Background and aims: The intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN), along with the brachial plexus, supplies the medial and posterior aspects of the upper arm. This study hypothesised that ultrasound blockade of ICBN by subpectoral intercostal plane block may provide faster and complete blockade compared to the pectoserratus plane block.

Methods: Sixty patients were randomised into two groups, and initially, an ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed. After 10 min, Group A received a subpectoral intercostal plane block at the second rib. Group B received a pectoserratus plane block at the fourth rib. Anaesthesia over the posterior and medial aspects of the upper arm was assessed. The primary outcome was the time of onset of the blockade. The secondary outcome was the time taken to perform the block and the block failure rate. Student's t-test was used to compare the means. The categorical variables were compared using the Chi-squared test. Significance was defined by a P value of <0.05.

Results: The time of onset of the block over the medial and posterior sides of the arm was significantly faster in Group A. Time taken for administering block in Group B was more than twice that of Group A (P < 0.001). The block was 100% successful in Group A, while in Group B, only 70% was successful.

Conclusion: The subpectoral intercostal plane block at the second rib produces a faster and more complete blockade of ICBN in all patients compared to the pectoserratus plane block at the fourth rib.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信