Maya Shats, Michal Zajicek, Matthew T Siedhoff, Raanan Meyer
{"title":"bb0和生育率的最新消息。","authors":"Maya Shats, Michal Zajicek, Matthew T Siedhoff, Raanan Meyer","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000001039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Adenomyosis, characterized by ectopic endometrial tissue within the myometrium, causes chronic pelvic pain, heavy bleeding, and reduced fertility. Nowadays, diagnosis relies heavily on imaging, primarily transvaginal ultrasound, supplemented by MRI. While hysterectomy remains a definitive treatment, the rise in younger patients desiring fertility necessitates uterine-sparing approaches. This review aimed to evaluate these approaches in relation to their impact on fertility and obstetrical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Research highlights the association between adenomyosis and increased risk for pregnancy loss, preterm birth, and pre-eclampsia. Minimally invasive thermal ablation therapies and hysteroscopic techniques, including adenomyomectomy, offer promising fertility-sparing options, although long-term data on fertility outcomes and potential complications like uterine rupture remain limited. Advances in laparoscopic and laparotomy-based cytoreductive surgeries are also explored, but large-scale studies comparing efficacy and safety are lacking.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This review examines recent advancements in understanding and managing adenomyosis, focusing on fertility-sparing interventions. Studies show varying success rates for these interventions, highlighting the need for larger, well-designed trials with standardized diagnostic criteria, to assess long-term fertility outcomes, and refine patient selection for optimal results. A consistent challenge across all approaches is the potential for uterine rupture and placenta accreta spectrum, demanding careful patient selection and close monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"198-206"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Updates on adenomyosis and fertility.\",\"authors\":\"Maya Shats, Michal Zajicek, Matthew T Siedhoff, Raanan Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GCO.0000000000001039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Adenomyosis, characterized by ectopic endometrial tissue within the myometrium, causes chronic pelvic pain, heavy bleeding, and reduced fertility. Nowadays, diagnosis relies heavily on imaging, primarily transvaginal ultrasound, supplemented by MRI. While hysterectomy remains a definitive treatment, the rise in younger patients desiring fertility necessitates uterine-sparing approaches. This review aimed to evaluate these approaches in relation to their impact on fertility and obstetrical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Research highlights the association between adenomyosis and increased risk for pregnancy loss, preterm birth, and pre-eclampsia. Minimally invasive thermal ablation therapies and hysteroscopic techniques, including adenomyomectomy, offer promising fertility-sparing options, although long-term data on fertility outcomes and potential complications like uterine rupture remain limited. Advances in laparoscopic and laparotomy-based cytoreductive surgeries are also explored, but large-scale studies comparing efficacy and safety are lacking.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This review examines recent advancements in understanding and managing adenomyosis, focusing on fertility-sparing interventions. Studies show varying success rates for these interventions, highlighting the need for larger, well-designed trials with standardized diagnostic criteria, to assess long-term fertility outcomes, and refine patient selection for optimal results. A consistent challenge across all approaches is the potential for uterine rupture and placenta accreta spectrum, demanding careful patient selection and close monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"198-206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000001039\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000001039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose of review: Adenomyosis, characterized by ectopic endometrial tissue within the myometrium, causes chronic pelvic pain, heavy bleeding, and reduced fertility. Nowadays, diagnosis relies heavily on imaging, primarily transvaginal ultrasound, supplemented by MRI. While hysterectomy remains a definitive treatment, the rise in younger patients desiring fertility necessitates uterine-sparing approaches. This review aimed to evaluate these approaches in relation to their impact on fertility and obstetrical outcomes.
Recent findings: Research highlights the association between adenomyosis and increased risk for pregnancy loss, preterm birth, and pre-eclampsia. Minimally invasive thermal ablation therapies and hysteroscopic techniques, including adenomyomectomy, offer promising fertility-sparing options, although long-term data on fertility outcomes and potential complications like uterine rupture remain limited. Advances in laparoscopic and laparotomy-based cytoreductive surgeries are also explored, but large-scale studies comparing efficacy and safety are lacking.
Summary: This review examines recent advancements in understanding and managing adenomyosis, focusing on fertility-sparing interventions. Studies show varying success rates for these interventions, highlighting the need for larger, well-designed trials with standardized diagnostic criteria, to assess long-term fertility outcomes, and refine patient selection for optimal results. A consistent challenge across all approaches is the potential for uterine rupture and placenta accreta spectrum, demanding careful patient selection and close monitoring.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With eleven disciplines published across the year – including reproductive endocrinology, gynecologic cancer and fertility– every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.