{"title":"门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术中无肌松剂使用瑞芬太尼时SPI的变化。","authors":"E Boselli, B Allaouchiche","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01297-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared ANI and SPI during outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy without muscle relaxants. Forty adult patients were included in this prospective observational study. Induction was performed using propofol, ketamine and remifentanil. All patients received bilateral TAP block. Maintenance of anesthesia was performed using remifentanil targeted to ANI 50-80 and desflurane targeted to MAC 0.8-1.2 without muscle relaxants. The ANI and SPI values were collected at different time-points and analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA. The relationship between ANI and SPI were analyzed by linear regression. All procedures were performed without muscle relaxants. The mean ± SD ANI values significantly decreased from 70 ± 12 at induction to 57 ± 15 at intubation and 56 ± 17 at extubation and were maintained in the 50-80 target range throughout incision to exsufflation. The mean ± SD SPI values significantly decreased from 60 ± 15 at induction to 38 ± 16 at intubation, increased at 73 ± 14 at extubation and were in the 20-50 target range throughout incision to exsufflation. There was a poor but significant negative linear relationship (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.053, p < 0.001) between SPI and ANI values. During laparoscopic cholecystectomy without muscle relaxants, remifentanil titrated to achieve a target ANI range of 50-80 provides SPI values with poor correlation ranging from 20 to 50, corresponding to adequate nociception-antinociception balance. Other studies comparing ANI and SPI guided remifentanil administration are required to determine the effect of each strategy on patient outcomes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy or other types of surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"707-715"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variations of SPI during outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy without muscle relaxants using ANI-guided remifentanil.\",\"authors\":\"E Boselli, B Allaouchiche\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10877-025-01297-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study compared ANI and SPI during outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy without muscle relaxants. Forty adult patients were included in this prospective observational study. Induction was performed using propofol, ketamine and remifentanil. All patients received bilateral TAP block. Maintenance of anesthesia was performed using remifentanil targeted to ANI 50-80 and desflurane targeted to MAC 0.8-1.2 without muscle relaxants. The ANI and SPI values were collected at different time-points and analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA. The relationship between ANI and SPI were analyzed by linear regression. All procedures were performed without muscle relaxants. The mean ± SD ANI values significantly decreased from 70 ± 12 at induction to 57 ± 15 at intubation and 56 ± 17 at extubation and were maintained in the 50-80 target range throughout incision to exsufflation. The mean ± SD SPI values significantly decreased from 60 ± 15 at induction to 38 ± 16 at intubation, increased at 73 ± 14 at extubation and were in the 20-50 target range throughout incision to exsufflation. There was a poor but significant negative linear relationship (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.053, p < 0.001) between SPI and ANI values. During laparoscopic cholecystectomy without muscle relaxants, remifentanil titrated to achieve a target ANI range of 50-80 provides SPI values with poor correlation ranging from 20 to 50, corresponding to adequate nociception-antinociception balance. Other studies comparing ANI and SPI guided remifentanil administration are required to determine the effect of each strategy on patient outcomes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy or other types of surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"707-715\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01297-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01297-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究比较了门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术不使用肌肉松弛剂时的ANI和SPI。40名成年患者纳入了这项前瞻性观察性研究。诱导使用异丙酚、氯胺酮和瑞芬太尼。所有患者均接受双侧TAP阻滞。在不使用肌肉松弛剂的情况下,使用靶向ANI 50-80的瑞芬太尼和靶向MAC 0.8-1.2的地氟醚维持麻醉。在不同时间点收集ANI和SPI值,并使用重复测量方差分析进行分析。通过线性回归分析ANI与SPI之间的关系。所有手术均不使用肌肉松弛剂。平均±SD ANI值从诱导时的70±12下降到插管时的57±15和拔管时的56±17,并在整个切口至呼气过程中保持在50-80的目标范围内。平均±SD SPI值从诱导时的60±15下降到插管时的38±16,拔管时的73±14上升,在整个切口至呼气过程中处于20-50的目标范围。两者呈显著负线性关系(r2 = 0.053, p
Variations of SPI during outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy without muscle relaxants using ANI-guided remifentanil.
This study compared ANI and SPI during outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy without muscle relaxants. Forty adult patients were included in this prospective observational study. Induction was performed using propofol, ketamine and remifentanil. All patients received bilateral TAP block. Maintenance of anesthesia was performed using remifentanil targeted to ANI 50-80 and desflurane targeted to MAC 0.8-1.2 without muscle relaxants. The ANI and SPI values were collected at different time-points and analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA. The relationship between ANI and SPI were analyzed by linear regression. All procedures were performed without muscle relaxants. The mean ± SD ANI values significantly decreased from 70 ± 12 at induction to 57 ± 15 at intubation and 56 ± 17 at extubation and were maintained in the 50-80 target range throughout incision to exsufflation. The mean ± SD SPI values significantly decreased from 60 ± 15 at induction to 38 ± 16 at intubation, increased at 73 ± 14 at extubation and were in the 20-50 target range throughout incision to exsufflation. There was a poor but significant negative linear relationship (r2 = 0.053, p < 0.001) between SPI and ANI values. During laparoscopic cholecystectomy without muscle relaxants, remifentanil titrated to achieve a target ANI range of 50-80 provides SPI values with poor correlation ranging from 20 to 50, corresponding to adequate nociception-antinociception balance. Other studies comparing ANI and SPI guided remifentanil administration are required to determine the effect of each strategy on patient outcomes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy or other types of surgery.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine.
The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group.
The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.