外行人参与卫生技术评估的学习策略:范围审查。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alex Itaborahy, Quenia Morais, Leny Frossard, Iandy Mateus, Bianca Leite, Marisa Santos
{"title":"外行人参与卫生技术评估的学习策略:范围审查。","authors":"Alex Itaborahy, Quenia Morais, Leny Frossard, Iandy Mateus, Bianca Leite, Marisa Santos","doi":"10.1017/S0266462325000200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To provide an overview of learning strategies that health technology assessment (HTA) agencies use worldwide to educate laypeople about HTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review focused on learning strategies to educate laypeople about HTA using the Joanna Briggs Institute frameworks was conducted across databases and gray literature. The study reviewed qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies from four databases, including practice documents from the HTA and health organization websites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies were included in this review. The United Kingdom, Spain, and Canada mainly contributed to knowledge about educating laypeople in HTA. The main strategies employed were conference-like events, educational materials, training, and plain language. International HTA and health agencies developed courses, online training, and guidance materials to increase laypeople's participation in the HTA process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efforts to improve public involvement in HTA focus on structured consultations, digital platforms, and capacity-building to enhance accessibility. Strategies like workshops and plain language aim to encourage lay participation, but challenges such as technical complexity and limited resources persist. Despite these challenges, incorporating patient perspectives has increased research relevance and public trust. Future studies should examine standardized frameworks for involvement, the impact of lay participation on policy, and solutions to barriers to a more equitable HTA process.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":"41 1","pages":"e26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning strategies for laypeople to participate in health technology assessment: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Alex Itaborahy, Quenia Morais, Leny Frossard, Iandy Mateus, Bianca Leite, Marisa Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0266462325000200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To provide an overview of learning strategies that health technology assessment (HTA) agencies use worldwide to educate laypeople about HTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review focused on learning strategies to educate laypeople about HTA using the Joanna Briggs Institute frameworks was conducted across databases and gray literature. The study reviewed qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies from four databases, including practice documents from the HTA and health organization websites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies were included in this review. The United Kingdom, Spain, and Canada mainly contributed to knowledge about educating laypeople in HTA. The main strategies employed were conference-like events, educational materials, training, and plain language. International HTA and health agencies developed courses, online training, and guidance materials to increase laypeople's participation in the HTA process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efforts to improve public involvement in HTA focus on structured consultations, digital platforms, and capacity-building to enhance accessibility. Strategies like workshops and plain language aim to encourage lay participation, but challenges such as technical complexity and limited resources persist. Despite these challenges, incorporating patient perspectives has increased research relevance and public trust. Future studies should examine standardized frameworks for involvement, the impact of lay participation on policy, and solutions to barriers to a more equitable HTA process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"e26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086598/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462325000200\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462325000200","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:概述卫生技术评估(HTA)机构在全球范围内对外行人进行卫生技术评估教育的学习策略。方法:利用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的框架,在数据库和灰色文献中对外行人进行HTA教育的学习策略进行了范围审查。该研究回顾了来自四个数据库的定性、定量和混合方法研究,包括来自HTA和卫生组织网站的实践文件。结果:本综述纳入了15项研究。英国、西班牙和加拿大主要提供了教育HTA外行的知识。采用的主要策略是类似会议的活动、教育材料、培训和通俗易懂的语言。国际HTA和卫生机构开发了课程、在线培训和指导材料,以增加外行人对HTA进程的参与。结论:提高公众对HTA参与的努力侧重于结构化咨询、数字平台和能力建设,以提高可及性。研讨会和通俗易懂的语言等策略旨在鼓励外行参与,但技术复杂性和资源有限等挑战仍然存在。尽管存在这些挑战,纳入患者的观点增加了研究的相关性和公众的信任。今后的研究应审查标准化的参与框架、非专业人员参与对政策的影响,以及阻碍更公平的卫生行政审查过程的障碍的解决办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning strategies for laypeople to participate in health technology assessment: a scoping review.

Objectives: To provide an overview of learning strategies that health technology assessment (HTA) agencies use worldwide to educate laypeople about HTA.

Methods: A scoping review focused on learning strategies to educate laypeople about HTA using the Joanna Briggs Institute frameworks was conducted across databases and gray literature. The study reviewed qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies from four databases, including practice documents from the HTA and health organization websites.

Results: Fifteen studies were included in this review. The United Kingdom, Spain, and Canada mainly contributed to knowledge about educating laypeople in HTA. The main strategies employed were conference-like events, educational materials, training, and plain language. International HTA and health agencies developed courses, online training, and guidance materials to increase laypeople's participation in the HTA process.

Conclusions: Efforts to improve public involvement in HTA focus on structured consultations, digital platforms, and capacity-building to enhance accessibility. Strategies like workshops and plain language aim to encourage lay participation, but challenges such as technical complexity and limited resources persist. Despite these challenges, incorporating patient perspectives has increased research relevance and public trust. Future studies should examine standardized frameworks for involvement, the impact of lay participation on policy, and solutions to barriers to a more equitable HTA process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信