牲畜系统的崩溃和恢复对欧亚草原火灾制度的影响:对生态系统和生物多样性影响的回顾。

IF 4.7 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Johannes Kamp, Tejas Bhagwat, Norbert Hölzel, Ilya Smelansky
{"title":"牲畜系统的崩溃和恢复对欧亚草原火灾制度的影响:对生态系统和生物多样性影响的回顾。","authors":"Johannes Kamp, Tejas Bhagwat, Norbert Hölzel, Ilya Smelansky","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2024.0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Shifts in fire regimes can trigger rapid changes in ecosystem functioning and biodiversity. We synthesize evidence for patterns, causes and consequences of recent change in fire regimes across the Eurasian steppes, a neglected global fire hotspot. Political and economic turmoil following the break-up of the Soviet Union in 1991 triggered abrupt land abandonment over millions of hectares and a collapse of livestock populations. The build-up of vegetation as fuel, rural depopulation and deteriorating fire control led to a rapid increase in fire size, area burned and fire frequency. Fire regimes were also driven by drought, but likely only after fuel had accumulated. Increased fire disturbance resulted in grass encroachment, vegetation homogenization and decreasing plant species diversity. Feedback loops due to the high grass flammability were likely. Direct and carry-on effects on birds, keystone small mammals and insects were largely negative. Nutrient cycling and carbon balance changed, but these changes have yet to be quantified. The regime of large and frequent fires persisted until <i>ca</i> 2010 but shifted back to a more grazing-controlled regime as livestock populations recovered, reinforced by increasing precipitation. Key future research topics include the effects of future climate change, changing pyrodiversity and pyric herbivory on ecosystem resilience. Ongoing steppe restoration and rewilding efforts, and integrated fire management will benefit from a better understanding of fire regimes.This article is part of the theme issue 'Novel fire regimes under climate changes and human influences: impacts, ecosystem responses and feedbacks'.</p>","PeriodicalId":19872,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","volume":"380 1924","pages":"rstb20240062"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collapse and recovery of livestock systems shape fire regimes on the Eurasian steppe: a review of ecosystem and biodiversity implications.\",\"authors\":\"Johannes Kamp, Tejas Bhagwat, Norbert Hölzel, Ilya Smelansky\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rstb.2024.0062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Shifts in fire regimes can trigger rapid changes in ecosystem functioning and biodiversity. We synthesize evidence for patterns, causes and consequences of recent change in fire regimes across the Eurasian steppes, a neglected global fire hotspot. Political and economic turmoil following the break-up of the Soviet Union in 1991 triggered abrupt land abandonment over millions of hectares and a collapse of livestock populations. The build-up of vegetation as fuel, rural depopulation and deteriorating fire control led to a rapid increase in fire size, area burned and fire frequency. Fire regimes were also driven by drought, but likely only after fuel had accumulated. Increased fire disturbance resulted in grass encroachment, vegetation homogenization and decreasing plant species diversity. Feedback loops due to the high grass flammability were likely. Direct and carry-on effects on birds, keystone small mammals and insects were largely negative. Nutrient cycling and carbon balance changed, but these changes have yet to be quantified. The regime of large and frequent fires persisted until <i>ca</i> 2010 but shifted back to a more grazing-controlled regime as livestock populations recovered, reinforced by increasing precipitation. Key future research topics include the effects of future climate change, changing pyrodiversity and pyric herbivory on ecosystem resilience. Ongoing steppe restoration and rewilding efforts, and integrated fire management will benefit from a better understanding of fire regimes.This article is part of the theme issue 'Novel fire regimes under climate changes and human influences: impacts, ecosystem responses and feedbacks'.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"380 1924\",\"pages\":\"rstb20240062\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004101/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2024.0062\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2024.0062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

火灾制度的变化可以引发生态系统功能和生物多样性的快速变化。我们综合了欧亚大草原(一个被忽视的全球火灾热点)最近火灾制度变化的模式、原因和后果的证据。1991年苏联解体后的政治和经济动荡引发了数百万公顷土地的突然放弃和牲畜数量的锐减。作为燃料的植被的积累、农村人口的减少和火灾控制的恶化导致火灾规模、燃烧面积和火灾频率的迅速增加。干旱也会引发火灾,但可能是在燃料积累之后。火灾干扰的增加导致草地被侵蚀,植被同质化,植物物种多样性下降。可能是草的高可燃性导致了反馈循环。对鸟类、重要小型哺乳动物和昆虫的直接和持续影响很大程度上是负面的。养分循环和碳平衡发生了变化,但这些变化尚未被量化。大而频繁的火灾一直持续到2010年左右,但随着牲畜数量的恢复,降水的增加,又回到了更受放牧控制的状态。未来的重点研究课题包括未来气候变化、变化的热多样性和热草食对生态系统恢复力的影响。正在进行的草原恢复和再野生化工作以及综合火灾管理将受益于对火灾制度的更好理解。本文是“气候变化和人类影响下的新型火灾制度:影响、生态系统响应和反馈”主题的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collapse and recovery of livestock systems shape fire regimes on the Eurasian steppe: a review of ecosystem and biodiversity implications.

Shifts in fire regimes can trigger rapid changes in ecosystem functioning and biodiversity. We synthesize evidence for patterns, causes and consequences of recent change in fire regimes across the Eurasian steppes, a neglected global fire hotspot. Political and economic turmoil following the break-up of the Soviet Union in 1991 triggered abrupt land abandonment over millions of hectares and a collapse of livestock populations. The build-up of vegetation as fuel, rural depopulation and deteriorating fire control led to a rapid increase in fire size, area burned and fire frequency. Fire regimes were also driven by drought, but likely only after fuel had accumulated. Increased fire disturbance resulted in grass encroachment, vegetation homogenization and decreasing plant species diversity. Feedback loops due to the high grass flammability were likely. Direct and carry-on effects on birds, keystone small mammals and insects were largely negative. Nutrient cycling and carbon balance changed, but these changes have yet to be quantified. The regime of large and frequent fires persisted until ca 2010 but shifted back to a more grazing-controlled regime as livestock populations recovered, reinforced by increasing precipitation. Key future research topics include the effects of future climate change, changing pyrodiversity and pyric herbivory on ecosystem resilience. Ongoing steppe restoration and rewilding efforts, and integrated fire management will benefit from a better understanding of fire regimes.This article is part of the theme issue 'Novel fire regimes under climate changes and human influences: impacts, ecosystem responses and feedbacks'.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
1.60%
发文量
365
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal publishes topics across the life sciences. As long as the core subject lies within the biological sciences, some issues may also include content crossing into other areas such as the physical sciences, social sciences, biophysics, policy, economics etc. Issues generally sit within four broad areas (although many issues sit across these areas): Organismal, environmental and evolutionary biology Neuroscience and cognition Cellular, molecular and developmental biology Health and disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信