加拿大安全供应试点项目实施的障碍和促进因素:对服务提供者观点的定性评估。

IF 4 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Frishta Nafeh, Lucas Martignetti, Carol Strike, Gillian Kolla, Matthew Bonn, Caroline Brunelle, Jade Boyd, Elaine Hyshka, Cassidy Morris, Jolene Eeuwes, Heather Hobbs, Elizabeth Haywood, Bernadette Pauly, Dan Werb, Mohammad Karamouzian
{"title":"加拿大安全供应试点项目实施的障碍和促进因素:对服务提供者观点的定性评估。","authors":"Frishta Nafeh, Lucas Martignetti, Carol Strike, Gillian Kolla, Matthew Bonn, Caroline Brunelle, Jade Boyd, Elaine Hyshka, Cassidy Morris, Jolene Eeuwes, Heather Hobbs, Elizabeth Haywood, Bernadette Pauly, Dan Werb, Mohammad Karamouzian","doi":"10.1186/s12954-025-01177-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In response to the ongoing drug toxicity crisis, driven by fentanyl and its analogues in the unregulated drug supply, Canada has funded several safer supply programs, which provide pharmaceutical-grade medications to reduce the reliance on toxic unregulated drug supply for people who use drugs. In this study, we examined barriers and facilitators that influenced the implementation of integrated safer supply pilot programs (ISSPP) across Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between March 2022 and May 2023, we conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with key informants from ten ISSPP located in three provinces across Canada. Data analysis and interpretation of findings were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Thematic analysis was used to code transcripts and identify themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ISSPP varied greatly in the degree of ancillary and wraparound services provided. Additionally, differences existed across the ten programs in terms of eligibility criteria for enrolling clients and the availability of medication options. We found twelve constructs and three sub-constructs across four domains of CFIR that influenced the implementation of ISSPP. Implementation facilitators included low-barrier and client-centered delivery model, ongoing needs assessment through program monitoring and evaluation, integration of wraparound care, partnership with local services to coordinate client care, community buy-in, clinical protocols and standardized practices, and multidisciplinary care teams with motivated staff. Major barriers to ISSPP implementation were a volatile and toxic unregulated drug supply, complicated policy environments, unsustainable funding models, unsupportive regulatory environments, limited medication options, limited physical space, as well as staff shortage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite several internal implementation facilitators, ISSPP faced many external and policy-level implementation barriers. Future safer supply programs should be guided by evidence-based planning and implementation, drawing from successful experiences in harm reduction implementation. Implementation facilitators, in particular, evidence-based practice guidelines along with better monitoring of client outcomes can be leveraged to enhance quality of care, address client needs and preferences, and mitigate unintended harms.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"68"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators to safer supply pilot program implementation in Canada: a qualitative assessment of service provider perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Frishta Nafeh, Lucas Martignetti, Carol Strike, Gillian Kolla, Matthew Bonn, Caroline Brunelle, Jade Boyd, Elaine Hyshka, Cassidy Morris, Jolene Eeuwes, Heather Hobbs, Elizabeth Haywood, Bernadette Pauly, Dan Werb, Mohammad Karamouzian\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12954-025-01177-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In response to the ongoing drug toxicity crisis, driven by fentanyl and its analogues in the unregulated drug supply, Canada has funded several safer supply programs, which provide pharmaceutical-grade medications to reduce the reliance on toxic unregulated drug supply for people who use drugs. In this study, we examined barriers and facilitators that influenced the implementation of integrated safer supply pilot programs (ISSPP) across Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between March 2022 and May 2023, we conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with key informants from ten ISSPP located in three provinces across Canada. Data analysis and interpretation of findings were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Thematic analysis was used to code transcripts and identify themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ISSPP varied greatly in the degree of ancillary and wraparound services provided. Additionally, differences existed across the ten programs in terms of eligibility criteria for enrolling clients and the availability of medication options. We found twelve constructs and three sub-constructs across four domains of CFIR that influenced the implementation of ISSPP. Implementation facilitators included low-barrier and client-centered delivery model, ongoing needs assessment through program monitoring and evaluation, integration of wraparound care, partnership with local services to coordinate client care, community buy-in, clinical protocols and standardized practices, and multidisciplinary care teams with motivated staff. Major barriers to ISSPP implementation were a volatile and toxic unregulated drug supply, complicated policy environments, unsustainable funding models, unsupportive regulatory environments, limited medication options, limited physical space, as well as staff shortage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite several internal implementation facilitators, ISSPP faced many external and policy-level implementation barriers. Future safer supply programs should be guided by evidence-based planning and implementation, drawing from successful experiences in harm reduction implementation. Implementation facilitators, in particular, evidence-based practice guidelines along with better monitoring of client outcomes can be leveraged to enhance quality of care, address client needs and preferences, and mitigate unintended harms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harm Reduction Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039088/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harm Reduction Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-025-01177-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-025-01177-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了应对芬太尼及其类似物在不受管制的药物供应中引发的持续药物毒性危机,加拿大资助了几个更安全的供应方案,提供制药级药物,以减少吸毒者对有毒不受管制的药物供应的依赖。在这项研究中,我们研究了影响加拿大实施综合安全供应试点计划(ISSPP)的障碍和促进因素。方法:在2022年3月至2023年5月期间,我们对来自加拿大三个省的十个ISSPP的关键线人进行了半结构化访谈,进行了定性研究。数据分析和结果解释以实施研究综合框架(CFIR)为指导。主题分析用于编码转录本并确定主题。结果:ISSPP在提供辅助和包围服务的程度上差异很大。此外,10个项目在注册客户的资格标准和药物选择的可用性方面存在差异。我们发现了影响ISSPP实施的12个结构和3个子结构,跨越了CFIR的4个结构域。促进实施的因素包括低障碍和以客户为中心的交付模式、通过项目监测和评估进行的持续需求评估、综合护理、与当地服务机构合作协调客户护理、社区支持、临床协议和标准化做法,以及拥有积极工作人员的多学科护理团队。实施ISSPP的主要障碍是不稳定和有毒的无管制药物供应、复杂的政策环境、不可持续的筹资模式、不支持的监管环境、有限的药物选择、有限的物理空间以及工作人员短缺。结论:尽管有几个内部的实施促进因素,ISSPP面临许多外部和政策层面的实施障碍。未来更安全的供应规划应以基于证据的规划和实施为指导,借鉴减少危害实施方面的成功经验。可以利用实施促进因素,特别是循证实践指南,以及更好地监测客户结果,提高护理质量,满足客户需求和偏好,减轻意外伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Barriers and facilitators to safer supply pilot program implementation in Canada: a qualitative assessment of service provider perspectives.

Barriers and facilitators to safer supply pilot program implementation in Canada: a qualitative assessment of service provider perspectives.

Background: In response to the ongoing drug toxicity crisis, driven by fentanyl and its analogues in the unregulated drug supply, Canada has funded several safer supply programs, which provide pharmaceutical-grade medications to reduce the reliance on toxic unregulated drug supply for people who use drugs. In this study, we examined barriers and facilitators that influenced the implementation of integrated safer supply pilot programs (ISSPP) across Canada.

Methods: Between March 2022 and May 2023, we conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with key informants from ten ISSPP located in three provinces across Canada. Data analysis and interpretation of findings were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Thematic analysis was used to code transcripts and identify themes.

Results: ISSPP varied greatly in the degree of ancillary and wraparound services provided. Additionally, differences existed across the ten programs in terms of eligibility criteria for enrolling clients and the availability of medication options. We found twelve constructs and three sub-constructs across four domains of CFIR that influenced the implementation of ISSPP. Implementation facilitators included low-barrier and client-centered delivery model, ongoing needs assessment through program monitoring and evaluation, integration of wraparound care, partnership with local services to coordinate client care, community buy-in, clinical protocols and standardized practices, and multidisciplinary care teams with motivated staff. Major barriers to ISSPP implementation were a volatile and toxic unregulated drug supply, complicated policy environments, unsustainable funding models, unsupportive regulatory environments, limited medication options, limited physical space, as well as staff shortage.

Conclusions: Despite several internal implementation facilitators, ISSPP faced many external and policy-level implementation barriers. Future safer supply programs should be guided by evidence-based planning and implementation, drawing from successful experiences in harm reduction implementation. Implementation facilitators, in particular, evidence-based practice guidelines along with better monitoring of client outcomes can be leveraged to enhance quality of care, address client needs and preferences, and mitigate unintended harms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信