Comparing the effectiveness and safety of rescue balloon angioplasty versus stenting in acute large vessel occlusion after thrombectomy.

Background: Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a leading cause of failed mechanical thrombectomy (MT). To achieve successful recanalisation, rescue strategies such as balloon angioplasty and stenting are frequently employed. In this study, we aimed to investigate the comparative efficacy and safety of these strategies.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed the data of 321 patients with ICAS-related large vessel occlusion (LVO) treated with rescue balloon angioplasty (n=212) or stenting (n=109) after MT. The primary outcome was favourable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) at 3 months. Multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of outcomes, including subgroup analyses for anterior and posterior circulation.

Results: Overall, data of 321 patients (median age, 60 (IQR, 53-67) years; 80.4% male) were analysed from an initial cohort of 1601 patients. At 3 months, the balloon group demonstrated a trend towards a higher rate of favourable outcomes (34.9% vs 45.8%; OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.09, p=0.098). The stent group showed a trend towards a higher incidence of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (11.0% vs 4.2%; OR 2.22, 95% CI 0.80 to 6.14, p=0.124). In the posterior circulation subgroup, favourable outcomes were significantly lower in the stent group (20.5% vs 41.5%; OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.98, p=0.047).

Conclusion: Balloon angioplasty after MT may improve clinical outcomes to some extent in ICAS-related LVO with a lower incidence of intracranial haemorrhage compared with stenting, while stenting is an effective measure to prevent long-term restenosis.