{"title":"评估学校的残疾意识项目:纵向结果和措施的范围审查。","authors":"Alice Kelen Soper, Melissa Shivnauth, Holly Marini, Amanda Doherty-Kirby, Trinity Lowthian, Shree Dave, Samantha Noyek, Kerry Britt, Michelle Phoenix, Christine Imms, Peter Rosenbaum","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2496356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This scoping review examined the measures used, outcomes assessed, and the longitudinal impacts of disability awareness programs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Studies were identified from September 2011 to June 2023 across seven electronic databases. Covidence review software and Microsoft Excel were used to manage data. The data analysis included frequency counts of measures used and categorisation of the types of outcomes assessed. The longitudinal outcomes were synthesised according to the outcomes measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two studies were included from 26 countries, utilising a range of measures to assess cognitive, affective, and behavioural outcomes of programs. A subset of 14 longitudinal studies was identified to explore longer-term outcomes, from 1 to 30-month follow-up. All four longitudinal studies assessing cognitive outcomes demonstrated sustained increases. Ten of 11 studies that assessed changes in attitudes generally found sustained improvements, while only one of five studies found lasting improvements on behaviours.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disability awareness programs can be an effective approach to increase knowledge, improve attitudes and can, to some extent, increase inclusive behaviours of students towards peers with disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating disability awareness programs in schools: a scoping review of longitudinal outcomes and measures.\",\"authors\":\"Alice Kelen Soper, Melissa Shivnauth, Holly Marini, Amanda Doherty-Kirby, Trinity Lowthian, Shree Dave, Samantha Noyek, Kerry Britt, Michelle Phoenix, Christine Imms, Peter Rosenbaum\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638288.2025.2496356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This scoping review examined the measures used, outcomes assessed, and the longitudinal impacts of disability awareness programs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Studies were identified from September 2011 to June 2023 across seven electronic databases. Covidence review software and Microsoft Excel were used to manage data. The data analysis included frequency counts of measures used and categorisation of the types of outcomes assessed. The longitudinal outcomes were synthesised according to the outcomes measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two studies were included from 26 countries, utilising a range of measures to assess cognitive, affective, and behavioural outcomes of programs. A subset of 14 longitudinal studies was identified to explore longer-term outcomes, from 1 to 30-month follow-up. All four longitudinal studies assessing cognitive outcomes demonstrated sustained increases. Ten of 11 studies that assessed changes in attitudes generally found sustained improvements, while only one of five studies found lasting improvements on behaviours.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disability awareness programs can be an effective approach to increase knowledge, improve attitudes and can, to some extent, increase inclusive behaviours of students towards peers with disabilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2496356\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2496356","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating disability awareness programs in schools: a scoping review of longitudinal outcomes and measures.
Purpose: This scoping review examined the measures used, outcomes assessed, and the longitudinal impacts of disability awareness programs.
Materials and methods: Studies were identified from September 2011 to June 2023 across seven electronic databases. Covidence review software and Microsoft Excel were used to manage data. The data analysis included frequency counts of measures used and categorisation of the types of outcomes assessed. The longitudinal outcomes were synthesised according to the outcomes measured.
Results: Seventy-two studies were included from 26 countries, utilising a range of measures to assess cognitive, affective, and behavioural outcomes of programs. A subset of 14 longitudinal studies was identified to explore longer-term outcomes, from 1 to 30-month follow-up. All four longitudinal studies assessing cognitive outcomes demonstrated sustained increases. Ten of 11 studies that assessed changes in attitudes generally found sustained improvements, while only one of five studies found lasting improvements on behaviours.
Conclusions: Disability awareness programs can be an effective approach to increase knowledge, improve attitudes and can, to some extent, increase inclusive behaviours of students towards peers with disabilities.
期刊介绍:
Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.