面对面和视频会议心理治疗工作联盟量表测量不变性的证据。

IF 2.6 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Alberto Stefana
{"title":"面对面和视频会议心理治疗工作联盟量表测量不变性的证据。","authors":"Alberto Stefana","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2495827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (WAI-SR) is a self-report measure of therapeutic alliance from the patient's perspective. This study aimed to examine the factor structure of the WAI-SR and evaluate its measurement invariance across in-person and videoconferencing psychotherapy sessions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study sample consisted of 1043 adult patients. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to evaluate the WAI-SR dimensions and structure. Measurement invariance was tested using multi-group confirmatory factor analysis, multiple indicator multiple causes model analysis, and item bias analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings supported a three-factor structure of the WAI-SR, encompassing goal, task, and bond dimensions. Results demonstrated configural, metric, scalar, and residual invariance across in-person and videoconferencing formats. The factor structure remained consistent after accounting for patient age and gender. Additionally, no differential item functioning or bias was observed between groups. The WAI-SR exhibited excellent internal consistency and composite reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WAI-SR is a reliable and valid tool for assessing therapeutic alliance across both in-person and videoconferencing sessions. The equivalence in measurement properties and mean scores across modalities highlights the adaptability of therapeutic alliance to virtual environments, supporting the broader use of telehealth in psychotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence of Measurement Invariance in the Working Alliance Inventory Across In-Person and Videoconferencing Psychotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Stefana\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10503307.2025.2495827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (WAI-SR) is a self-report measure of therapeutic alliance from the patient's perspective. This study aimed to examine the factor structure of the WAI-SR and evaluate its measurement invariance across in-person and videoconferencing psychotherapy sessions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study sample consisted of 1043 adult patients. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to evaluate the WAI-SR dimensions and structure. Measurement invariance was tested using multi-group confirmatory factor analysis, multiple indicator multiple causes model analysis, and item bias analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings supported a three-factor structure of the WAI-SR, encompassing goal, task, and bond dimensions. Results demonstrated configural, metric, scalar, and residual invariance across in-person and videoconferencing formats. The factor structure remained consistent after accounting for patient age and gender. Additionally, no differential item functioning or bias was observed between groups. The WAI-SR exhibited excellent internal consistency and composite reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WAI-SR is a reliable and valid tool for assessing therapeutic alliance across both in-person and videoconferencing sessions. The equivalence in measurement properties and mean scores across modalities highlights the adaptability of therapeutic alliance to virtual environments, supporting the broader use of telehealth in psychotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2495827\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2495827","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:工作联盟量表-短修订(WAI-SR)是从患者角度对治疗联盟进行自我报告。本研究旨在探讨WAI-SR的因素结构,并评估其在面对面和视频会议心理治疗过程中的测量不变性。方法:研究样本为1043例成人患者。通过探索性和验证性因素分析来评估WAI-SR的维度和结构。采用多组验证性因子分析、多指标多因模型分析和项目偏倚分析检验测量不变性。结果:研究结果支持WAI-SR的三因素结构,包括目标、任务和联系维度。结果显示了面对面会议和视频会议格式之间的配置、度量、标量和残差不变性。在考虑患者年龄和性别后,因子结构保持一致。此外,在两组之间没有观察到差异的项目功能或偏见。WAI-SR具有良好的内部一致性和复合信度。结论:WAI-SR是评估面对面和视频会议治疗联盟的可靠和有效的工具。不同治疗方式测量属性和平均得分的等效性突出了治疗联盟对虚拟环境的适应性,支持了远程医疗在心理治疗中的广泛应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence of Measurement Invariance in the Working Alliance Inventory Across In-Person and Videoconferencing Psychotherapy.

Objective: The Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (WAI-SR) is a self-report measure of therapeutic alliance from the patient's perspective. This study aimed to examine the factor structure of the WAI-SR and evaluate its measurement invariance across in-person and videoconferencing psychotherapy sessions.

Method: The study sample consisted of 1043 adult patients. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to evaluate the WAI-SR dimensions and structure. Measurement invariance was tested using multi-group confirmatory factor analysis, multiple indicator multiple causes model analysis, and item bias analysis.

Results: The findings supported a three-factor structure of the WAI-SR, encompassing goal, task, and bond dimensions. Results demonstrated configural, metric, scalar, and residual invariance across in-person and videoconferencing formats. The factor structure remained consistent after accounting for patient age and gender. Additionally, no differential item functioning or bias was observed between groups. The WAI-SR exhibited excellent internal consistency and composite reliability.

Conclusions: The WAI-SR is a reliable and valid tool for assessing therapeutic alliance across both in-person and videoconferencing sessions. The equivalence in measurement properties and mean scores across modalities highlights the adaptability of therapeutic alliance to virtual environments, supporting the broader use of telehealth in psychotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy Research
Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信