以黑人的声音为中心:在整个研究过程中纳入生活经验,以促进药物治疗和结果的公平性。

IF 4 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Devin E Banks, Maria E Paschke, Kaytryn D Campbell, Daje D Bradshaw-Glenn, Rashmi Ghonasgi, Burton Barr, Arial Collins, Gerald Dennis, Keith Lofton, Alfred Long, Harriet Montgomery, Andreas Prince, Rachel P Winograd
{"title":"以黑人的声音为中心:在整个研究过程中纳入生活经验,以促进药物治疗和结果的公平性。","authors":"Devin E Banks, Maria E Paschke, Kaytryn D Campbell, Daje D Bradshaw-Glenn, Rashmi Ghonasgi, Burton Barr, Arial Collins, Gerald Dennis, Keith Lofton, Alfred Long, Harriet Montgomery, Andreas Prince, Rachel P Winograd","doi":"10.1186/s12954-025-01202-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black people in the United States face persistent and increasing inequities in addiction treatment access and drug overdose death. Incorporating people with lived experience through community based participatory research (CBPR) approaches can improve understanding of drivers of and solutions to such inequities. However, practical and systemic challenges limit incorporating Black people with lived experience with substance use across each step of the research process. This paper describes the methods, recommendations, and lessons learned from a research team and Black-led community advisory board (CAB) working together across the research process to promote equity in harm reduction and addiction treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CENTER Initiative is an academic-community partnership established to address increasing drug overdose deaths affecting the Black community in St. Louis, Missouri. The CAB comprised 10 Black people with lived experience recruited with the help of community-based agency partners. Academic staff dedicated to liaising with the CAB encouraged establishing structure and bylaws toward a self-governing CAB with decision-making power independent of agency partner and research teams.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CAB and research team collaborated across all stages of the research process including design (e.g., deciding inclusion criteria), recruitment (e.g., flier development and participant referrals), data collection (e.g., conducting qualitative interviews), analysis (e.g., qualitative coding), and dissemination. Aligned with CBPR principles, dissemination activities extended the impact of the research to create sustainability and community empowerment (e.g., through advocacy, direct intervention, capacity building, and funding). Key lessons learned for working with a CAB facing intersectional oppression include a balanced approach incorporating structure and flexibility, a need for adequate personnel and funding support, and the importance of relationship building.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating people with lived experience into the research process through CBPR can mitigate the harms and inefficiencies of research while enhancing its community impact. The CENTER CAB and research partners creatively collaborated across each step of the research and translated their findings to practical community empowerment and sustainability in innovative ways. Research institutions, funders and other stakeholders must support building relationships and capacity among academics and people with lived experience to advance racial health equity and justice in substance use research and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12010516/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CENTER-ing Black voices: incorporating lived experience across the research process to advance equity in drug treatment and outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Devin E Banks, Maria E Paschke, Kaytryn D Campbell, Daje D Bradshaw-Glenn, Rashmi Ghonasgi, Burton Barr, Arial Collins, Gerald Dennis, Keith Lofton, Alfred Long, Harriet Montgomery, Andreas Prince, Rachel P Winograd\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12954-025-01202-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black people in the United States face persistent and increasing inequities in addiction treatment access and drug overdose death. Incorporating people with lived experience through community based participatory research (CBPR) approaches can improve understanding of drivers of and solutions to such inequities. However, practical and systemic challenges limit incorporating Black people with lived experience with substance use across each step of the research process. This paper describes the methods, recommendations, and lessons learned from a research team and Black-led community advisory board (CAB) working together across the research process to promote equity in harm reduction and addiction treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CENTER Initiative is an academic-community partnership established to address increasing drug overdose deaths affecting the Black community in St. Louis, Missouri. The CAB comprised 10 Black people with lived experience recruited with the help of community-based agency partners. Academic staff dedicated to liaising with the CAB encouraged establishing structure and bylaws toward a self-governing CAB with decision-making power independent of agency partner and research teams.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CAB and research team collaborated across all stages of the research process including design (e.g., deciding inclusion criteria), recruitment (e.g., flier development and participant referrals), data collection (e.g., conducting qualitative interviews), analysis (e.g., qualitative coding), and dissemination. Aligned with CBPR principles, dissemination activities extended the impact of the research to create sustainability and community empowerment (e.g., through advocacy, direct intervention, capacity building, and funding). Key lessons learned for working with a CAB facing intersectional oppression include a balanced approach incorporating structure and flexibility, a need for adequate personnel and funding support, and the importance of relationship building.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating people with lived experience into the research process through CBPR can mitigate the harms and inefficiencies of research while enhancing its community impact. The CENTER CAB and research partners creatively collaborated across each step of the research and translated their findings to practical community empowerment and sustainability in innovative ways. Research institutions, funders and other stakeholders must support building relationships and capacity among academics and people with lived experience to advance racial health equity and justice in substance use research and outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harm Reduction Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12010516/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harm Reduction Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-025-01202-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-025-01202-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国黑人在成瘾治疗和药物过量死亡方面面临持续且日益严重的不平等。通过以社区为基础的参与性研究(CBPR)方法将有生活经验的人纳入进来,可以提高对这种不平等的驱动因素和解决办法的理解。然而,实际和系统的挑战限制了在研究过程的每个步骤中纳入具有药物使用生活经验的黑人。本文描述了研究小组和黑人领导的社区咨询委员会(CAB)在整个研究过程中共同努力促进减少危害和成瘾治疗的公平性的方法、建议和经验教训。方法:CENTER倡议是一个学术社区合作伙伴关系,旨在解决影响密苏里州圣路易斯黑人社区的药物过量死亡人数增加的问题。CAB由10名有生活经验的黑人组成,他们是在社区机构合作伙伴的帮助下招募的。致力于与CAB联络的学术人员鼓励建立一个自治的CAB,其决策权独立于代理伙伴和研究团队。结果:CAB和研究团队在研究过程的所有阶段都进行了合作,包括设计(例如,决定纳入标准)、招聘(例如,传单开发和参与者推荐)、数据收集(例如,进行定性访谈)、分析(例如,定性编码)和传播。根据CBPR原则,传播活动扩大了研究的影响,以创造可持续性和社区赋权(例如,通过宣传、直接干预、能力建设和资助)。与面临交叉压迫的CAB合作所获得的主要经验教训包括:采用兼顾结构和灵活性的平衡方法,需要足够的人员和资金支持,以及建立关系的重要性。结论:通过CBPR将有生活经验的人纳入研究过程可以减轻研究的危害和低效率,同时增强研究的社区影响。CAB中心和研究伙伴在研究的每一步都进行了创造性的合作,并以创新的方式将他们的发现转化为实际的社区赋权和可持续性。研究机构、资助者和其他利益攸关方必须支持在学术界和有实际经验的人之间建立关系和能力,以促进药物使用研究和成果中的种族健康公平和正义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

CENTER-ing Black voices: incorporating lived experience across the research process to advance equity in drug treatment and outcomes.

CENTER-ing Black voices: incorporating lived experience across the research process to advance equity in drug treatment and outcomes.

CENTER-ing Black voices: incorporating lived experience across the research process to advance equity in drug treatment and outcomes.

Background: Black people in the United States face persistent and increasing inequities in addiction treatment access and drug overdose death. Incorporating people with lived experience through community based participatory research (CBPR) approaches can improve understanding of drivers of and solutions to such inequities. However, practical and systemic challenges limit incorporating Black people with lived experience with substance use across each step of the research process. This paper describes the methods, recommendations, and lessons learned from a research team and Black-led community advisory board (CAB) working together across the research process to promote equity in harm reduction and addiction treatment.

Methods: The CENTER Initiative is an academic-community partnership established to address increasing drug overdose deaths affecting the Black community in St. Louis, Missouri. The CAB comprised 10 Black people with lived experience recruited with the help of community-based agency partners. Academic staff dedicated to liaising with the CAB encouraged establishing structure and bylaws toward a self-governing CAB with decision-making power independent of agency partner and research teams.

Results: The CAB and research team collaborated across all stages of the research process including design (e.g., deciding inclusion criteria), recruitment (e.g., flier development and participant referrals), data collection (e.g., conducting qualitative interviews), analysis (e.g., qualitative coding), and dissemination. Aligned with CBPR principles, dissemination activities extended the impact of the research to create sustainability and community empowerment (e.g., through advocacy, direct intervention, capacity building, and funding). Key lessons learned for working with a CAB facing intersectional oppression include a balanced approach incorporating structure and flexibility, a need for adequate personnel and funding support, and the importance of relationship building.

Conclusion: Integrating people with lived experience into the research process through CBPR can mitigate the harms and inefficiencies of research while enhancing its community impact. The CENTER CAB and research partners creatively collaborated across each step of the research and translated their findings to practical community empowerment and sustainability in innovative ways. Research institutions, funders and other stakeholders must support building relationships and capacity among academics and people with lived experience to advance racial health equity and justice in substance use research and outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信