南方种族隔离地区的公共卫生斗争如何反映并强化了系统性的种族卫生不平等。

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 ETHNIC STUDIES
Cheryl Elman, Kathryn M Feltey, Barbara Wittman, Corey Stevens, Molly B Hartsough
{"title":"南方种族隔离地区的公共卫生斗争如何反映并强化了系统性的种族卫生不平等。","authors":"Cheryl Elman, Kathryn M Feltey, Barbara Wittman, Corey Stevens, Molly B Hartsough","doi":"10.1017/s1742058x24000092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The twenty-first century COVID-19 epidemic revealed a U.S. public health system that countenanced health inequities and a U.S. public that resisted disease containment policies. This crisis, however, was only the most recent chapter in a longer struggle in the United States to institutionalize public health. We focus on two early twentieth-century public health campaigns in the American South, the unhealthiest U.S. region at the time. Black southerners-denied basic health, political, economic, and social rights under a rising Jim Crow regime-self-organized health services networks, including through the Tuskegee Woman's Club, the Negro Organization Society of Virginia, and the Moveable School (1890s-1915). Around the same time, a philanthropic project, the Rockefeller Sanitary Commission (RSC, 1909-1914), seeded state-level public health agencies in eleven southern states, thereby installing public health in a top-down manner. We use archival data sources to explore key similarities and differences in the public health concerns and coalition-building approaches of each campaign and southern resistance to their efforts. We find Black-led campaigns often blurred the color line to form coalitions that provided services to the underserved while tackling environmental health risks at the community level. In contrast, RSC affiliates in southern states, as directed by RSC administrators, provided health services as short-term public dispensaries. Services reached Black and White communities willing to participate but in a manner that did not overtly challenge Jim Crow-era practices. Southern resistance to public health expansion persisted under each approach. The legacies of these struggles remain; the political-economic and ideological forces that limited public health expansion while marginalizing Black community health efforts reverberate in public health inequities today.</p>","PeriodicalId":47158,"journal":{"name":"Du Bois Review-Social Science Research on Race","volume":"22 1","pages":"93-117"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How the Struggle for Public Health in the Jim Crow South Reflected and Reinforced Systemic Racial Health Inequality.\",\"authors\":\"Cheryl Elman, Kathryn M Feltey, Barbara Wittman, Corey Stevens, Molly B Hartsough\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s1742058x24000092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The twenty-first century COVID-19 epidemic revealed a U.S. public health system that countenanced health inequities and a U.S. public that resisted disease containment policies. This crisis, however, was only the most recent chapter in a longer struggle in the United States to institutionalize public health. We focus on two early twentieth-century public health campaigns in the American South, the unhealthiest U.S. region at the time. Black southerners-denied basic health, political, economic, and social rights under a rising Jim Crow regime-self-organized health services networks, including through the Tuskegee Woman's Club, the Negro Organization Society of Virginia, and the Moveable School (1890s-1915). Around the same time, a philanthropic project, the Rockefeller Sanitary Commission (RSC, 1909-1914), seeded state-level public health agencies in eleven southern states, thereby installing public health in a top-down manner. We use archival data sources to explore key similarities and differences in the public health concerns and coalition-building approaches of each campaign and southern resistance to their efforts. We find Black-led campaigns often blurred the color line to form coalitions that provided services to the underserved while tackling environmental health risks at the community level. In contrast, RSC affiliates in southern states, as directed by RSC administrators, provided health services as short-term public dispensaries. Services reached Black and White communities willing to participate but in a manner that did not overtly challenge Jim Crow-era practices. Southern resistance to public health expansion persisted under each approach. The legacies of these struggles remain; the political-economic and ideological forces that limited public health expansion while marginalizing Black community health efforts reverberate in public health inequities today.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Du Bois Review-Social Science Research on Race\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"93-117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002409/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Du Bois Review-Social Science Research on Race\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742058x24000092\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHNIC STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Du Bois Review-Social Science Research on Race","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742058x24000092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

21世纪的COVID-19大流行暴露了美国公共卫生系统纵容卫生不公平,以及美国公众抵制疾病控制政策。然而,这场危机只是美国为使公共卫生制度化而进行的长期斗争中的最新一章。我们关注的是二十世纪早期在美国南部的两次公共卫生运动,这是当时美国最不健康的地区。南方黑人在日渐崛起的吉姆·克劳政权下被剥夺了基本的健康、政治、经济和社会权利,于是他们通过塔斯基吉妇女俱乐部、弗吉尼亚黑人组织协会和可移动学校(1890 -1915)等组织了医疗服务网络。大约在同一时间,一个慈善项目,洛克菲勒卫生委员会(RSC, 1909-1914),在南方11个州建立了州级公共卫生机构,从而以自上而下的方式建立了公共卫生机构。我们使用档案数据来源来探索每个运动的公共卫生问题和联盟建立方法以及南方对其努力的抵制方面的关键异同。我们发现,黑人领导的运动往往模糊了肤色界限,形成了向服务不足的人提供服务的联盟,同时在社区一级解决环境健康风险。相反,南部各州的RSC附属机构在RSC管理人员的指导下,作为短期公共诊所提供保健服务。服务到达了愿意参与的黑人和白人社区,但在某种程度上没有公然挑战吉姆·克劳时代的做法。南方对扩大公共卫生的抵制在每种方法下都持续存在。这些斗争的遗产仍然存在;政治、经济和意识形态的力量限制了公共卫生的扩张,同时将黑人社区的卫生努力边缘化,这些力量在今天的公共卫生不平等中回响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How the Struggle for Public Health in the Jim Crow South Reflected and Reinforced Systemic Racial Health Inequality.

The twenty-first century COVID-19 epidemic revealed a U.S. public health system that countenanced health inequities and a U.S. public that resisted disease containment policies. This crisis, however, was only the most recent chapter in a longer struggle in the United States to institutionalize public health. We focus on two early twentieth-century public health campaigns in the American South, the unhealthiest U.S. region at the time. Black southerners-denied basic health, political, economic, and social rights under a rising Jim Crow regime-self-organized health services networks, including through the Tuskegee Woman's Club, the Negro Organization Society of Virginia, and the Moveable School (1890s-1915). Around the same time, a philanthropic project, the Rockefeller Sanitary Commission (RSC, 1909-1914), seeded state-level public health agencies in eleven southern states, thereby installing public health in a top-down manner. We use archival data sources to explore key similarities and differences in the public health concerns and coalition-building approaches of each campaign and southern resistance to their efforts. We find Black-led campaigns often blurred the color line to form coalitions that provided services to the underserved while tackling environmental health risks at the community level. In contrast, RSC affiliates in southern states, as directed by RSC administrators, provided health services as short-term public dispensaries. Services reached Black and White communities willing to participate but in a manner that did not overtly challenge Jim Crow-era practices. Southern resistance to public health expansion persisted under each approach. The legacies of these struggles remain; the political-economic and ideological forces that limited public health expansion while marginalizing Black community health efforts reverberate in public health inequities today.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信