基于智能手机的心电记录系统是否能提高儿科心悸患者的诊断率?

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hilal Al Riyami, Sultan Zamzami, Lisa K Hornberger, Yashu Coe, Shubhayan Sanatani, Francesca de la Cruz, Joseph Atallah, Carolina A Escudero
{"title":"基于智能手机的心电记录系统是否能提高儿科心悸患者的诊断率?","authors":"Hilal Al Riyami, Sultan Zamzami, Lisa K Hornberger, Yashu Coe, Shubhayan Sanatani, Francesca de la Cruz, Joseph Atallah, Carolina A Escudero","doi":"10.1111/pace.15190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Palpitations in children are common and obtaining symptom-rhythm correlation is diagnostic, but challenging to obtain. The AliveCor KardiaMobile monitor is a smartphone-based single-lead ECG event recorder with limited study in children. We compared using this smartphone recorder to a conventional (Cardiocall) event recorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective, randomized study of children presenting to pediatric cardiology for investigation of palpitations who require an event recorder for symptom-rhythm correlation. Patients were randomized to the smartphone or conventional recorder for rhythm documentation for 3 months or 4 weeks, respectively. Diagnostic tracings were defined as one pathologic arrhythmia or three sinus rhythm tracings. We assessed tracing quality, diagnoses obtained, and time to diagnosis between groups. Patients were surveyed to assess perceptions of using the devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred participants were enrolled and randomized to 50 in each group. Diagnostic tracings were achieved in 51% versus 44% (p = 0.525) in the smartphone versus conventional group at means of 23.7 (SD 36.4) versus 11.5 (SD 15.2) days, p = 0.181. Participants who used the smartphone monitor were more likely to transmit recordings (70% vs. 49%, p = 0.037) and more often willing to use the device again (87% vs. 42%, p = 0.015), with no differences between groups in finding episodes easy to record (74% vs. 100%, p = 0.15), easy to transmit (70% vs. 46%, p = 0.26), or overall satisfaction (83% vs. 58%, p = 0.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Smartphone monitor devices provided similar diagnostic yield to conventional monitors in children. Families who used the smartphone monitor were more willing to use the device again.</p>","PeriodicalId":54653,"journal":{"name":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does a Smartphone-Based ECG Recording System in Pediatric Patients With Palpitations Improve Diagnostic Yield?\",\"authors\":\"Hilal Al Riyami, Sultan Zamzami, Lisa K Hornberger, Yashu Coe, Shubhayan Sanatani, Francesca de la Cruz, Joseph Atallah, Carolina A Escudero\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pace.15190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Palpitations in children are common and obtaining symptom-rhythm correlation is diagnostic, but challenging to obtain. The AliveCor KardiaMobile monitor is a smartphone-based single-lead ECG event recorder with limited study in children. We compared using this smartphone recorder to a conventional (Cardiocall) event recorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective, randomized study of children presenting to pediatric cardiology for investigation of palpitations who require an event recorder for symptom-rhythm correlation. Patients were randomized to the smartphone or conventional recorder for rhythm documentation for 3 months or 4 weeks, respectively. Diagnostic tracings were defined as one pathologic arrhythmia or three sinus rhythm tracings. We assessed tracing quality, diagnoses obtained, and time to diagnosis between groups. Patients were surveyed to assess perceptions of using the devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred participants were enrolled and randomized to 50 in each group. Diagnostic tracings were achieved in 51% versus 44% (p = 0.525) in the smartphone versus conventional group at means of 23.7 (SD 36.4) versus 11.5 (SD 15.2) days, p = 0.181. Participants who used the smartphone monitor were more likely to transmit recordings (70% vs. 49%, p = 0.037) and more often willing to use the device again (87% vs. 42%, p = 0.015), with no differences between groups in finding episodes easy to record (74% vs. 100%, p = 0.15), easy to transmit (70% vs. 46%, p = 0.26), or overall satisfaction (83% vs. 58%, p = 0.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Smartphone monitor devices provided similar diagnostic yield to conventional monitors in children. Families who used the smartphone monitor were more willing to use the device again.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.15190\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.15190","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童心悸是常见的,获得症状-节律相关性是诊断性的,但很难获得。AliveCor KardiaMobile监测仪是一种基于智能手机的单导联心电图事件记录仪,在儿童中进行了有限的研究。我们将这种智能手机记录仪与传统的(cardicall)事件记录仪进行了比较。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性的、随机的研究,研究儿童心悸需要事件记录仪来记录症状-节律相关性。患者被随机分配到智能手机或传统记录仪,分别记录3个月或4周的心律。诊断示踪定义为1次病理性心律失常或3次窦性心律示踪。我们评估了两组间的追踪质量、获得的诊断和诊断时间。研究人员对患者进行了调查,以评估他们对使用这些设备的感觉。结果:入组100人,每组50人。智能手机组和常规组的诊断追踪率分别为51%和44% (p = 0.525),平均为23.7天(SD 36.4)和11.5天(SD 15.2)天,p = 0.181。使用智能手机监测器的参与者更有可能传输录音(70%对49%,p = 0.037),并且更愿意再次使用该设备(87%对42%,p = 0.015),各组之间在发现易于记录的情节(74%对100%,p = 0.15),易于传输(70%对46%,p = 0.26)或总体满意度(83%对58%,p = 0.13)方面没有差异。结论:智能手机监护设备对儿童的诊断率与传统监护设备相似。使用智能手机监视器的家庭更愿意再次使用该设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does a Smartphone-Based ECG Recording System in Pediatric Patients With Palpitations Improve Diagnostic Yield?

Introduction: Palpitations in children are common and obtaining symptom-rhythm correlation is diagnostic, but challenging to obtain. The AliveCor KardiaMobile monitor is a smartphone-based single-lead ECG event recorder with limited study in children. We compared using this smartphone recorder to a conventional (Cardiocall) event recorder.

Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized study of children presenting to pediatric cardiology for investigation of palpitations who require an event recorder for symptom-rhythm correlation. Patients were randomized to the smartphone or conventional recorder for rhythm documentation for 3 months or 4 weeks, respectively. Diagnostic tracings were defined as one pathologic arrhythmia or three sinus rhythm tracings. We assessed tracing quality, diagnoses obtained, and time to diagnosis between groups. Patients were surveyed to assess perceptions of using the devices.

Results: One hundred participants were enrolled and randomized to 50 in each group. Diagnostic tracings were achieved in 51% versus 44% (p = 0.525) in the smartphone versus conventional group at means of 23.7 (SD 36.4) versus 11.5 (SD 15.2) days, p = 0.181. Participants who used the smartphone monitor were more likely to transmit recordings (70% vs. 49%, p = 0.037) and more often willing to use the device again (87% vs. 42%, p = 0.015), with no differences between groups in finding episodes easy to record (74% vs. 100%, p = 0.15), easy to transmit (70% vs. 46%, p = 0.26), or overall satisfaction (83% vs. 58%, p = 0.13).

Conclusion: Smartphone monitor devices provided similar diagnostic yield to conventional monitors in children. Families who used the smartphone monitor were more willing to use the device again.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
209
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (PACE) is the foremost peer-reviewed journal in the field of pacing and implantable cardioversion defibrillation, publishing over 50% of all English language articles in its field, featuring original, review, and didactic papers, and case reports related to daily practice. Articles also include editorials, book reviews, Musings on humane topics relevant to medical practice, electrophysiology (EP) rounds, device rounds, and information concerning the quality of devices used in the practice of the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信