Irène Mopin, Gilles Le Chenadec, Michel Legris, Philippe Blondel, Benoît Zerr, Jacques Marchal
{"title":"在用回声测深仪进行海底测绘的背景下,将海底声学响应的确定性和随机性联系起来。","authors":"Irène Mopin, Gilles Le Chenadec, Michel Legris, Philippe Blondel, Benoît Zerr, Jacques Marchal","doi":"10.1121/10.0036569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the different contexts where the monostatic acoustic seafloor response (ASR) is employed (i.e., measurements with multibeam or singlebeam echosounders, applications in seabed mapping, theoretical models with physical or heuristic parameters), its intrinsic nature can be ambiguous. In this article, an analysis of the discrepancies in semantics is proposed, and then the ASR theoretical and physical definitions are recalled. In theoretical models, and while it is acquired at sea, the ASR is shown to be considered as a deterministic parameter. However, a large variability in its measurements with echosounders is observed, suggesting ASR to be physically a stochastic variable. These two seemingly contradictory observations are linked analytically based on a point scattering model. The theoretical and deterministic ASR is related to its stochastic measurements as the expected value. Based on this connection and under the hypotheses of seafloor homogeneity and large insonified areas, the monostatic ASR measured by echosounders (i.e., the backscattering strength) is derived as twice the parameter of the Rayleigh distribution. Relationships between this result and seabed characteristics are discussed, along with their implications for echosounder operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"157 5","pages":"3524-3537"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linking deterministic and stochastic aspects of the seafloor's acoustic response in the context of seabed mapping with echosounders.\",\"authors\":\"Irène Mopin, Gilles Le Chenadec, Michel Legris, Philippe Blondel, Benoît Zerr, Jacques Marchal\",\"doi\":\"10.1121/10.0036569\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the different contexts where the monostatic acoustic seafloor response (ASR) is employed (i.e., measurements with multibeam or singlebeam echosounders, applications in seabed mapping, theoretical models with physical or heuristic parameters), its intrinsic nature can be ambiguous. In this article, an analysis of the discrepancies in semantics is proposed, and then the ASR theoretical and physical definitions are recalled. In theoretical models, and while it is acquired at sea, the ASR is shown to be considered as a deterministic parameter. However, a large variability in its measurements with echosounders is observed, suggesting ASR to be physically a stochastic variable. These two seemingly contradictory observations are linked analytically based on a point scattering model. The theoretical and deterministic ASR is related to its stochastic measurements as the expected value. Based on this connection and under the hypotheses of seafloor homogeneity and large insonified areas, the monostatic ASR measured by echosounders (i.e., the backscattering strength) is derived as twice the parameter of the Rayleigh distribution. Relationships between this result and seabed characteristics are discussed, along with their implications for echosounder operations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America\",\"volume\":\"157 5\",\"pages\":\"3524-3537\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0036569\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0036569","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Linking deterministic and stochastic aspects of the seafloor's acoustic response in the context of seabed mapping with echosounders.
In the different contexts where the monostatic acoustic seafloor response (ASR) is employed (i.e., measurements with multibeam or singlebeam echosounders, applications in seabed mapping, theoretical models with physical or heuristic parameters), its intrinsic nature can be ambiguous. In this article, an analysis of the discrepancies in semantics is proposed, and then the ASR theoretical and physical definitions are recalled. In theoretical models, and while it is acquired at sea, the ASR is shown to be considered as a deterministic parameter. However, a large variability in its measurements with echosounders is observed, suggesting ASR to be physically a stochastic variable. These two seemingly contradictory observations are linked analytically based on a point scattering model. The theoretical and deterministic ASR is related to its stochastic measurements as the expected value. Based on this connection and under the hypotheses of seafloor homogeneity and large insonified areas, the monostatic ASR measured by echosounders (i.e., the backscattering strength) is derived as twice the parameter of the Rayleigh distribution. Relationships between this result and seabed characteristics are discussed, along with their implications for echosounder operations.
期刊介绍:
Since 1929 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America has been the leading source of theoretical and experimental research results in the broad interdisciplinary study of sound. Subject coverage includes: linear and nonlinear acoustics; aeroacoustics, underwater sound and acoustical oceanography; ultrasonics and quantum acoustics; architectural and structural acoustics and vibration; speech, music and noise; psychology and physiology of hearing; engineering acoustics, transduction; bioacoustics, animal bioacoustics.