物质使用障碍患者的乳腺癌筛查:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kento Sonoda, Timothy Chrusciel, Jennifer K Bello, Sarah C Gebauer, Richard Grucza, Jeffrey F Scherrer
{"title":"物质使用障碍患者的乳腺癌筛查:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Kento Sonoda, Timothy Chrusciel, Jennifer K Bello, Sarah C Gebauer, Richard Grucza, Jeffrey F Scherrer","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is limited evidence about whether a substance use disorder (SUD) is a barrier to breast cancer screening. Because SUDs are highly prevalent in the USA, it is important to establish whether this patient population is less likely to obtain screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 220 227 patients, with 209 132 having no SUD and 11 095 (5.0%) with SUD based on electronic health record data in a multi-state, Midwestern healthcare system (1 January 2018-31 December 2022). The outcome was the receipt of a mammogram in the 5-year follow-up period. Patients were women aged 40-69 years as of 1 January 2018, with ≥ 2 in-person primary care visits between 2018 and 2022. Covariates included demographics, health services utilization, and physical/psychiatric conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age of the sample was 54.7 (± 8.3) years old. After controlling for confounding, women without any SUDs had more than twice the odds of mammogram receipt compared to those with stimulant use disorder (odds ratio [OR] 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.83-2.33). Women with no SUDs had 89% higher odds of mammogram receipt compared to those with opioid use disorder (OR 1.89; 95% CI: 1.76-2.03), followed by \"other\" SUDs (OR 1.86; 95% CI: 1.69-2.06), sedative use (OR 1.70; 95% CI: 1.43-2.04), cannabis use (OR 1.58; 95% CI: 1.44-1.74), and alcohol use disorders (OR 1.49; 95% CI: 1.41-1.58).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the high prevalence of SUDs, evidence of preventive service delivery among individuals with SUDs is still lacking. Further research is needed to investigate other healthcare disparities in preventive service delivery among individuals with SUDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"42 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breast cancer screening among individuals with a substance use disorder: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Kento Sonoda, Timothy Chrusciel, Jennifer K Bello, Sarah C Gebauer, Richard Grucza, Jeffrey F Scherrer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/fampra/cmaf018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is limited evidence about whether a substance use disorder (SUD) is a barrier to breast cancer screening. Because SUDs are highly prevalent in the USA, it is important to establish whether this patient population is less likely to obtain screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 220 227 patients, with 209 132 having no SUD and 11 095 (5.0%) with SUD based on electronic health record data in a multi-state, Midwestern healthcare system (1 January 2018-31 December 2022). The outcome was the receipt of a mammogram in the 5-year follow-up period. Patients were women aged 40-69 years as of 1 January 2018, with ≥ 2 in-person primary care visits between 2018 and 2022. Covariates included demographics, health services utilization, and physical/psychiatric conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age of the sample was 54.7 (± 8.3) years old. After controlling for confounding, women without any SUDs had more than twice the odds of mammogram receipt compared to those with stimulant use disorder (odds ratio [OR] 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.83-2.33). Women with no SUDs had 89% higher odds of mammogram receipt compared to those with opioid use disorder (OR 1.89; 95% CI: 1.76-2.03), followed by \\\"other\\\" SUDs (OR 1.86; 95% CI: 1.69-2.06), sedative use (OR 1.70; 95% CI: 1.43-2.04), cannabis use (OR 1.58; 95% CI: 1.44-1.74), and alcohol use disorders (OR 1.49; 95% CI: 1.41-1.58).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the high prevalence of SUDs, evidence of preventive service delivery among individuals with SUDs is still lacking. Further research is needed to investigate other healthcare disparities in preventive service delivery among individuals with SUDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family practice\",\"volume\":\"42 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf018\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关于物质使用障碍(SUD)是否是乳腺癌筛查的障碍的证据有限。由于sud在美国非常普遍,因此确定这一患者群体是否不太可能获得筛查非常重要。方法:基于美国中西部多州医疗系统(2018年1月1日至2022年12月31日)的电子病历数据,本回顾性队列研究纳入220227例患者,其中209 132例无SUD, 11095例(5.0%)有SUD。结果是在5年随访期间接受乳房x光检查。患者为截至2018年1月1日年龄在40-69岁之间的女性,在2018年至2022年期间进行了2次以上的亲自初级保健就诊。协变量包括人口统计、卫生服务利用和身体/精神状况。结果:患者平均年龄54.7(±8.3)岁。在控制混杂因素后,没有任何sud的女性接受乳房x光检查的几率是兴奋剂使用障碍女性的两倍多(优势比[OR] 2.06;95%置信区间[CI]: 1.83-2.33)。与阿片类药物使用障碍的女性相比,没有sud的女性接受乳房x光检查的几率高出89% (OR 1.89;95% CI: 1.76-2.03),其次是“其他”sud (OR 1.86;95% CI: 1.69-2.06),使用镇静剂(OR 1.70;95% CI: 1.43-2.04),大麻使用(OR 1.58;95% CI: 1.44-1.74)和酒精使用障碍(OR 1.49;95% ci: 1.41-1.58)。结论:尽管sud的患病率很高,但在sud患者中提供预防性服务的证据仍然缺乏。需要进一步的研究来调查sud患者在提供预防服务方面的其他保健差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Breast cancer screening among individuals with a substance use disorder: a retrospective cohort study.

Purpose: There is limited evidence about whether a substance use disorder (SUD) is a barrier to breast cancer screening. Because SUDs are highly prevalent in the USA, it is important to establish whether this patient population is less likely to obtain screening.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 220 227 patients, with 209 132 having no SUD and 11 095 (5.0%) with SUD based on electronic health record data in a multi-state, Midwestern healthcare system (1 January 2018-31 December 2022). The outcome was the receipt of a mammogram in the 5-year follow-up period. Patients were women aged 40-69 years as of 1 January 2018, with ≥ 2 in-person primary care visits between 2018 and 2022. Covariates included demographics, health services utilization, and physical/psychiatric conditions.

Results: Mean age of the sample was 54.7 (± 8.3) years old. After controlling for confounding, women without any SUDs had more than twice the odds of mammogram receipt compared to those with stimulant use disorder (odds ratio [OR] 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.83-2.33). Women with no SUDs had 89% higher odds of mammogram receipt compared to those with opioid use disorder (OR 1.89; 95% CI: 1.76-2.03), followed by "other" SUDs (OR 1.86; 95% CI: 1.69-2.06), sedative use (OR 1.70; 95% CI: 1.43-2.04), cannabis use (OR 1.58; 95% CI: 1.44-1.74), and alcohol use disorders (OR 1.49; 95% CI: 1.41-1.58).

Conclusions: Despite the high prevalence of SUDs, evidence of preventive service delivery among individuals with SUDs is still lacking. Further research is needed to investigate other healthcare disparities in preventive service delivery among individuals with SUDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信