Amy Ann Abbott, Julia Shin, Kathryn Carlson, Marion Russell, Yongyue Qi, Hannah Storm, Vanessa Dawn Jewell
{"title":"评估基于职业指导(OBC)临床试验干预的保真度的评估者间一致性和信度。","authors":"Amy Ann Abbott, Julia Shin, Kathryn Carlson, Marion Russell, Yongyue Qi, Hannah Storm, Vanessa Dawn Jewell","doi":"10.1177/03080226241283292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Establishing inter-rater agreement and reliability ascertains that multiple raters consistently evaluate observed interventions to ensure that clinical research protocols are delivered as intended by the trial protocol.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Using the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies, we (a) exemplified the steps to establish inter-rater reliability and inter-rater agreement on the occupation-based coaching Video Evaluation Tool and (b) evaluated best practices that promoted high inter-rater reliability and inter-rater agreement between blinded raters prior to starting a pilot randomized controlled trial. The randomized controlled trial examined the preliminary effectiveness of occupation-based coaching via telehealth for rural families with children living with type 1 diabetes to improve family quality of life, participation, self-efficacy, and child health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We created a library of 13 occupation-based coaching videos portraying a range of evaluations, scores, and ratings. The inter-rater agreement and reliability on the occupation-based coaching Video Evaluation Tool were established through the iterations of (a) blinded rater training, (b) data collection using the tool, and (c) statistical analysis using Cohen's kappa and Cronbach's alpha.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Occurrence and Non-Occurrence Checklist (κ = 0.881, <i>p</i> < 0.001); \"Caregiver Talk\" and \"Interventionist Talk Analysis\" (ICC = 0.991-0.999, <i>p</i> < 0.001); Evidence of Independent Capacity Rating (ICC = 0.867 <i>p</i> = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Strong inter-rater reliability and inter-rater agreement was established by engaging two blinded raters through multifaceted training, integrating real-life clients and contexts into the instrumentation and training, and precisely defined rubric criteria. By employing such practices, high inter-rater reliability and agreement can be achieved in clinical research involving interventions and instruments that are highly subjective and individualized. To ascertain greater scientific confidence in the intervention effect, developing a multidomain fidelity framework and establishing high inter-rater agreement and reliability in the instruments a priori to implementation of clinical trials are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":49096,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"88 3","pages":"133-141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033844/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Achieving Inter-Rater Agreement and Inter-Rater Reliability to Assess Fidelity of an Occupation-Based Coaching (OBC) Clinical Trial Intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Amy Ann Abbott, Julia Shin, Kathryn Carlson, Marion Russell, Yongyue Qi, Hannah Storm, Vanessa Dawn Jewell\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03080226241283292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Establishing inter-rater agreement and reliability ascertains that multiple raters consistently evaluate observed interventions to ensure that clinical research protocols are delivered as intended by the trial protocol.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Using the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies, we (a) exemplified the steps to establish inter-rater reliability and inter-rater agreement on the occupation-based coaching Video Evaluation Tool and (b) evaluated best practices that promoted high inter-rater reliability and inter-rater agreement between blinded raters prior to starting a pilot randomized controlled trial. The randomized controlled trial examined the preliminary effectiveness of occupation-based coaching via telehealth for rural families with children living with type 1 diabetes to improve family quality of life, participation, self-efficacy, and child health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We created a library of 13 occupation-based coaching videos portraying a range of evaluations, scores, and ratings. The inter-rater agreement and reliability on the occupation-based coaching Video Evaluation Tool were established through the iterations of (a) blinded rater training, (b) data collection using the tool, and (c) statistical analysis using Cohen's kappa and Cronbach's alpha.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Occurrence and Non-Occurrence Checklist (κ = 0.881, <i>p</i> < 0.001); \\\"Caregiver Talk\\\" and \\\"Interventionist Talk Analysis\\\" (ICC = 0.991-0.999, <i>p</i> < 0.001); Evidence of Independent Capacity Rating (ICC = 0.867 <i>p</i> = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Strong inter-rater reliability and inter-rater agreement was established by engaging two blinded raters through multifaceted training, integrating real-life clients and contexts into the instrumentation and training, and precisely defined rubric criteria. By employing such practices, high inter-rater reliability and agreement can be achieved in clinical research involving interventions and instruments that are highly subjective and individualized. To ascertain greater scientific confidence in the intervention effect, developing a multidomain fidelity framework and establishing high inter-rater agreement and reliability in the instruments a priori to implementation of clinical trials are necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":\"88 3\",\"pages\":\"133-141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033844/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226241283292\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226241283292","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
引言:建立评级者之间的一致性和可靠性确定了多个评级者一致地评估观察到的干预措施,以确保临床研究方案按照试验方案的预期交付。目的:使用报告可靠性和一致性研究指南,我们(a)举例说明了在基于职业的教练视频评估工具上建立评分者间可靠性和评分者间一致性的步骤,(b)评估了在开始随机对照试验之前促进盲法评分者间高可靠性和评分者间一致性的最佳实践。本随机对照试验考察了通过远程医疗对有1型糖尿病儿童的农村家庭进行职业指导的初步效果,以改善家庭生活质量、参与、自我效能和儿童健康结果。方法:我们创建了一个包含13个基于职业的教练视频的库,这些视频描绘了一系列的评估、分数和评级。通过(a)盲法培训评分员,(b)使用该工具收集数据,(c)使用Cohen’s kappa和Cronbach’s alpha进行统计分析,建立职业化教练视频评估工具的评分员间一致性和信度。发现:发生与未发生核对表(κ = 0.881, p p = 0.006)。结论:通过对两名盲法评分者进行多方面的培训,将现实生活中的客户和情境整合到工具和培训中,并精确定义评分标准,建立了较强的评分者之间的可靠性和一致性。通过采用这种做法,在涉及高度主观和个性化的干预措施和工具的临床研究中,可以实现较高的评分者之间的可靠性和一致性。为了对干预效果确定更大的科学信心,有必要开发一个多域保真度框架,并在实施临床试验之前在工具中建立高度的评分者之间的一致性和可靠性。
Achieving Inter-Rater Agreement and Inter-Rater Reliability to Assess Fidelity of an Occupation-Based Coaching (OBC) Clinical Trial Intervention.
Introduction: Establishing inter-rater agreement and reliability ascertains that multiple raters consistently evaluate observed interventions to ensure that clinical research protocols are delivered as intended by the trial protocol.
Purpose: Using the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies, we (a) exemplified the steps to establish inter-rater reliability and inter-rater agreement on the occupation-based coaching Video Evaluation Tool and (b) evaluated best practices that promoted high inter-rater reliability and inter-rater agreement between blinded raters prior to starting a pilot randomized controlled trial. The randomized controlled trial examined the preliminary effectiveness of occupation-based coaching via telehealth for rural families with children living with type 1 diabetes to improve family quality of life, participation, self-efficacy, and child health outcomes.
Method: We created a library of 13 occupation-based coaching videos portraying a range of evaluations, scores, and ratings. The inter-rater agreement and reliability on the occupation-based coaching Video Evaluation Tool were established through the iterations of (a) blinded rater training, (b) data collection using the tool, and (c) statistical analysis using Cohen's kappa and Cronbach's alpha.
Findings: Occurrence and Non-Occurrence Checklist (κ = 0.881, p < 0.001); "Caregiver Talk" and "Interventionist Talk Analysis" (ICC = 0.991-0.999, p < 0.001); Evidence of Independent Capacity Rating (ICC = 0.867 p = 0.006).
Conclusion: Strong inter-rater reliability and inter-rater agreement was established by engaging two blinded raters through multifaceted training, integrating real-life clients and contexts into the instrumentation and training, and precisely defined rubric criteria. By employing such practices, high inter-rater reliability and agreement can be achieved in clinical research involving interventions and instruments that are highly subjective and individualized. To ascertain greater scientific confidence in the intervention effect, developing a multidomain fidelity framework and establishing high inter-rater agreement and reliability in the instruments a priori to implementation of clinical trials are necessary.
期刊介绍:
British Journal of Occupational Therapy (BJOT) is the official journal of the Royal College of Occupational Therapists. Its purpose is to publish articles with international relevance that advance knowledge in research, practice, education, and management in occupational therapy. It is a monthly peer reviewed publication that disseminates evidence on the effectiveness, benefit, and value of occupational therapy so that occupational therapists, service users, and key stakeholders can make informed decisions. BJOT publishes research articles, reviews, practice analyses, opinion pieces, editorials, letters to the editor and book reviews. It also regularly publishes special issues on topics relevant to occupational therapy.