二氢吡啶钙通道阻滞剂毒性的血管加压剂使用、重症监护管理和结果。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY
Journal of Medical Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-11 DOI:10.1007/s13181-025-01069-6
Hannah H Spungen, John Michael Sherman, Kaitlin Ryan, Jessica J Krueger, Michael Levine, Meghan B Spyres
{"title":"二氢吡啶钙通道阻滞剂毒性的血管加压剂使用、重症监护管理和结果。","authors":"Hannah H Spungen, John Michael Sherman, Kaitlin Ryan, Jessica J Krueger, Michael Levine, Meghan B Spyres","doi":"10.1007/s13181-025-01069-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DHP CCBs) are considered to have less direct myocardial toxicity than non-dihydropyridines, DHPs remain a common cause of morbidity and mortality. We sought to examine various indices of critical illness and describe the clinical course of a population of DHP CCB-poisoned patients with special attention to vasopressor dosing and ischemic complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective chart review of DHP CCB exposures admitted to a single center. The study site was a single tertiary referral center with an in-house medical toxicology consultation/admitting service. Inclusion criteria included age ≥ 14 years and DHP ingestion noted on departmental patient log. Patients were excluded if DHP exposure was not documented in the medical record. The study period ranged from July 1, 2010 through December 31, 2022. Data on clinical presentation, management, and outcomes were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight cases of DHP exposure were analyzed; 87% were intentional ingestions. Amlodipine represented 88% of cases. 85% included cases involved co-ingestions. Vasopressors were administered in 42 cases (62%), with a median of three agents (IQR 1-4). Norepinephrine was most common (N = 41; 98%), followed by epinephrine (N = 23; 55%); median maximal rates were 45.0 (IQR 13.5-70.0) and 25.0 (IQR 12.0-30.0) mcg/min, respectively. 15% (N = 10) received high dose insulin-euglycemic therapy (HIE); all had > 2 vasopressors administered before administration of HIE. Twelve (18%) patients had ischemic complications; five (7%) experienced ischemic complications not evident before vasopressor administration. There were five deaths (7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple vasopressor use was common in this population of patients with DHP CCB toxicity. Despite the high doses of vasopressors used, temporally related ischemic complications were uncommon.</p>","PeriodicalId":16429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"304-311"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vasopressor Use, Critical Care Management, and Outcomes in Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blocker Toxicity.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah H Spungen, John Michael Sherman, Kaitlin Ryan, Jessica J Krueger, Michael Levine, Meghan B Spyres\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13181-025-01069-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DHP CCBs) are considered to have less direct myocardial toxicity than non-dihydropyridines, DHPs remain a common cause of morbidity and mortality. We sought to examine various indices of critical illness and describe the clinical course of a population of DHP CCB-poisoned patients with special attention to vasopressor dosing and ischemic complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective chart review of DHP CCB exposures admitted to a single center. The study site was a single tertiary referral center with an in-house medical toxicology consultation/admitting service. Inclusion criteria included age ≥ 14 years and DHP ingestion noted on departmental patient log. Patients were excluded if DHP exposure was not documented in the medical record. The study period ranged from July 1, 2010 through December 31, 2022. Data on clinical presentation, management, and outcomes were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight cases of DHP exposure were analyzed; 87% were intentional ingestions. Amlodipine represented 88% of cases. 85% included cases involved co-ingestions. Vasopressors were administered in 42 cases (62%), with a median of three agents (IQR 1-4). Norepinephrine was most common (N = 41; 98%), followed by epinephrine (N = 23; 55%); median maximal rates were 45.0 (IQR 13.5-70.0) and 25.0 (IQR 12.0-30.0) mcg/min, respectively. 15% (N = 10) received high dose insulin-euglycemic therapy (HIE); all had > 2 vasopressors administered before administration of HIE. Twelve (18%) patients had ischemic complications; five (7%) experienced ischemic complications not evident before vasopressor administration. There were five deaths (7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple vasopressor use was common in this population of patients with DHP CCB toxicity. Despite the high doses of vasopressors used, temporally related ischemic complications were uncommon.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"304-311\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205106/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-025-01069-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-025-01069-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然二氢吡啶钙通道阻滞剂(DHP CCBs)被认为比非二氢吡啶具有更少的直接心肌毒性,但DHP仍然是发病率和死亡率的常见原因。我们试图检查危重疾病的各种指标,并描述DHP ccb中毒患者的临床过程,特别注意血管加压剂的剂量和缺血性并发症。方法:这是一个单一中心DHP - CCB暴露的回顾性图表回顾。研究地点是一个具有内部医学毒理学咨询/入院服务的单一三级转诊中心。纳入标准包括年龄≥14岁,并在部门患者日志中记录DHP摄入情况。如果医疗记录中没有DHP暴露记录,则排除患者。研究期间为2010年7月1日至2022年12月31日。报告了临床表现、管理和结果的数据。结果:共分析DHP暴露68例;87%为故意摄入。氨氯地平占88%。85%的病例涉及共同摄入。42例(62%)使用血管加压药物,中位数为3种药物(IQR 1-4)。去甲肾上腺素最常见(N = 41;98%),其次是肾上腺素(N = 23;55%);中位最大速率分别为45.0 (IQR 13.5-70.0)和25.0 (IQR 12.0-30.0) mcg/min。15% (N = 10)接受高剂量胰岛素-血糖治疗(HIE);所有患者在给予HIE治疗前均已服用了bb20血管加压药物。12例(18%)患者有缺血性并发症;5例(7%)患者在给药前出现不明显的缺血性并发症。死亡5例(7%)。结论:在DHP CCB毒性患者中,多种血管加压药的使用是常见的。尽管使用了高剂量的血管加压剂,但暂时性相关的缺血性并发症并不常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vasopressor Use, Critical Care Management, and Outcomes in Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blocker Toxicity.

Introduction: Although dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DHP CCBs) are considered to have less direct myocardial toxicity than non-dihydropyridines, DHPs remain a common cause of morbidity and mortality. We sought to examine various indices of critical illness and describe the clinical course of a population of DHP CCB-poisoned patients with special attention to vasopressor dosing and ischemic complications.

Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of DHP CCB exposures admitted to a single center. The study site was a single tertiary referral center with an in-house medical toxicology consultation/admitting service. Inclusion criteria included age ≥ 14 years and DHP ingestion noted on departmental patient log. Patients were excluded if DHP exposure was not documented in the medical record. The study period ranged from July 1, 2010 through December 31, 2022. Data on clinical presentation, management, and outcomes were reported.

Results: Sixty-eight cases of DHP exposure were analyzed; 87% were intentional ingestions. Amlodipine represented 88% of cases. 85% included cases involved co-ingestions. Vasopressors were administered in 42 cases (62%), with a median of three agents (IQR 1-4). Norepinephrine was most common (N = 41; 98%), followed by epinephrine (N = 23; 55%); median maximal rates were 45.0 (IQR 13.5-70.0) and 25.0 (IQR 12.0-30.0) mcg/min, respectively. 15% (N = 10) received high dose insulin-euglycemic therapy (HIE); all had > 2 vasopressors administered before administration of HIE. Twelve (18%) patients had ischemic complications; five (7%) experienced ischemic complications not evident before vasopressor administration. There were five deaths (7%).

Conclusions: Multiple vasopressor use was common in this population of patients with DHP CCB toxicity. Despite the high doses of vasopressors used, temporally related ischemic complications were uncommon.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Toxicology (JMT) is a peer-reviewed medical journal dedicated to advances in clinical toxicology, focusing on the diagnosis, management, and prevention of poisoning and other adverse health effects resulting from medications, chemicals, occupational and environmental substances, and biological hazards. As the official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT), JMT is managed by an editorial board of clinicians as well as scientists and thus publishes research that is relevant to medical toxicologists, emergency physicians, critical care specialists, pediatricians, pre-hospital providers, occupational physicians, substance abuse experts, veterinary toxicologists, and policy makers.       JMT articles generate considerable interest in the lay media, with 2016 JMT articles cited by various social media sites, the Boston Globe, and the Washington Post among others.     For questions or comments about the journal, please contact jmtinfo@acmt.net.    For questions or comments about the journal, please contact jmtinfo@acmt.net.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信