上尿路上皮癌经皮穿刺活检的肿瘤安全性和诊断率:UPERCUT研究。

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Doriane Prost, Atanas Pachev, Eric De Kerviler, Michael Baboudjian, Evanguelos Xylinas, Thomas Seisen, François Audenet, Lucas Bento, Olivier Traxer, Frédéric Panthier, Benjamin Pradere, Gauthier Marcq, Priscilla Leon, Yves Allory, Constance Thibault, Alexandre Roussel, Xavier Belin, David Chemouni, Morgan Roupret, Yann Neuzillet, François Desgrandchamps, Mathieu Roumiguie, Alexandra Masson-Lecomte
{"title":"上尿路上皮癌经皮穿刺活检的肿瘤安全性和诊断率:UPERCUT研究。","authors":"Doriane Prost, Atanas Pachev, Eric De Kerviler, Michael Baboudjian, Evanguelos Xylinas, Thomas Seisen, François Audenet, Lucas Bento, Olivier Traxer, Frédéric Panthier, Benjamin Pradere, Gauthier Marcq, Priscilla Leon, Yves Allory, Constance Thibault, Alexandre Roussel, Xavier Belin, David Chemouni, Morgan Roupret, Yann Neuzillet, François Desgrandchamps, Mathieu Roumiguie, Alexandra Masson-Lecomte","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>A percutaneous biopsy of suspected upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is considered contraindicated due to potential safety concerns. This study evaluated the risk of tumor seeding along the needle track following a percutaneous needle-core biopsy for UTUC, along with diagnostic yield and oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective multicenter study involving 53 patients who underwent a percutaneous biopsy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma between 2012 and 2022. The primary endpoint was tumor recurrence along the biopsy needle track, assessed through a centralized review of follow-up cross-sectional imaging. The secondary endpoints included biopsy yield, histological concordance in tumor stage and grade compared with final histology in cases of nephroureterectomy, complication rates, and overall oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The cohort consisted of 60% male patients with a mean age of 69 yr. At diagnosis, 32% had metastatic disease. A biopsy was performed due to diagnostic uncertainty regarding renal cell carcinoma or other diseases, distant metastases, or failed endoscopic biopsy. The median follow-up imaging time was 8.3 mo. Tumor track seeding occurred in one case (1.9%) 5 mo after the procedure. Biopsy yield was 94%, with histological concordance rates of 78% for tumor stage and 100% for grade. Complications occurred in 14.8% of cases, including two (3.7%) cases of obstructive pyelonephritis requiring endoscopic management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>A percutaneous biopsy is a useful diagnostic tool for high-grade invasive upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma, with a low risk of tumor track seeding. It provides critical histological confirmation, facilitating future research on neoadjuvant systemic therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oncological Safety and Diagnostic Yield of Percutaneous Needle-core Biopsies in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: The UPERCUT Study.\",\"authors\":\"Doriane Prost, Atanas Pachev, Eric De Kerviler, Michael Baboudjian, Evanguelos Xylinas, Thomas Seisen, François Audenet, Lucas Bento, Olivier Traxer, Frédéric Panthier, Benjamin Pradere, Gauthier Marcq, Priscilla Leon, Yves Allory, Constance Thibault, Alexandre Roussel, Xavier Belin, David Chemouni, Morgan Roupret, Yann Neuzillet, François Desgrandchamps, Mathieu Roumiguie, Alexandra Masson-Lecomte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euo.2025.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>A percutaneous biopsy of suspected upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is considered contraindicated due to potential safety concerns. This study evaluated the risk of tumor seeding along the needle track following a percutaneous needle-core biopsy for UTUC, along with diagnostic yield and oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective multicenter study involving 53 patients who underwent a percutaneous biopsy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma between 2012 and 2022. The primary endpoint was tumor recurrence along the biopsy needle track, assessed through a centralized review of follow-up cross-sectional imaging. The secondary endpoints included biopsy yield, histological concordance in tumor stage and grade compared with final histology in cases of nephroureterectomy, complication rates, and overall oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The cohort consisted of 60% male patients with a mean age of 69 yr. At diagnosis, 32% had metastatic disease. A biopsy was performed due to diagnostic uncertainty regarding renal cell carcinoma or other diseases, distant metastases, or failed endoscopic biopsy. The median follow-up imaging time was 8.3 mo. Tumor track seeding occurred in one case (1.9%) 5 mo after the procedure. Biopsy yield was 94%, with histological concordance rates of 78% for tumor stage and 100% for grade. Complications occurred in 14.8% of cases, including two (3.7%) cases of obstructive pyelonephritis requiring endoscopic management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>A percutaneous biopsy is a useful diagnostic tool for high-grade invasive upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma, with a low risk of tumor track seeding. It provides critical histological confirmation, facilitating future research on neoadjuvant systemic therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.03.002\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.03.002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:由于潜在的安全问题,怀疑上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)的经皮活检被认为是禁忌的。本研究评估了UTUC经皮穿刺穿刺活检后肿瘤沿穿刺轨迹生长的风险,以及诊断率和肿瘤预后。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性多中心研究,纳入了2012年至2022年间因上尿路尿路上皮癌接受经皮活检的53例患者。主要终点是沿活检针迹的肿瘤复发,通过随访的集中回顾横断面成像进行评估。次要终点包括活检率、肿瘤分期和分级与肾输尿管切除术患者最终组织学的一致性、并发症发生率和总体肿瘤预后。主要发现和局限性:该队列包括60%的男性患者,平均年龄为69岁。诊断时,32%有转移性疾病。由于肾细胞癌或其他疾病、远处转移或内镜活检失败的诊断不确定,进行活检。中位随访影像时间为8.3个月。1例(1.9%)在手术后5个月出现肿瘤轨迹播散。活检率为94%,肿瘤分期的组织学一致性为78%,肿瘤分级的组织学一致性为100%。14.8%的病例出现并发症,其中2例(3.7%)为梗阻性肾盂肾炎,需要内镜治疗。结论和临床意义:经皮穿刺活检是诊断高级别侵入性上尿路尿路上皮癌的有效工具,肿瘤轨迹植入的风险低。它提供了关键的组织学证实,促进了未来新辅助全身治疗的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oncological Safety and Diagnostic Yield of Percutaneous Needle-core Biopsies in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: The UPERCUT Study.

Background and objective: A percutaneous biopsy of suspected upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is considered contraindicated due to potential safety concerns. This study evaluated the risk of tumor seeding along the needle track following a percutaneous needle-core biopsy for UTUC, along with diagnostic yield and oncological outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study involving 53 patients who underwent a percutaneous biopsy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma between 2012 and 2022. The primary endpoint was tumor recurrence along the biopsy needle track, assessed through a centralized review of follow-up cross-sectional imaging. The secondary endpoints included biopsy yield, histological concordance in tumor stage and grade compared with final histology in cases of nephroureterectomy, complication rates, and overall oncological outcomes.

Key findings and limitations: The cohort consisted of 60% male patients with a mean age of 69 yr. At diagnosis, 32% had metastatic disease. A biopsy was performed due to diagnostic uncertainty regarding renal cell carcinoma or other diseases, distant metastases, or failed endoscopic biopsy. The median follow-up imaging time was 8.3 mo. Tumor track seeding occurred in one case (1.9%) 5 mo after the procedure. Biopsy yield was 94%, with histological concordance rates of 78% for tumor stage and 100% for grade. Complications occurred in 14.8% of cases, including two (3.7%) cases of obstructive pyelonephritis requiring endoscopic management.

Conclusions and clinical implications: A percutaneous biopsy is a useful diagnostic tool for high-grade invasive upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma, with a low risk of tumor track seeding. It provides critical histological confirmation, facilitating future research on neoadjuvant systemic therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
128
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Journal Name: European Urology Oncology Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology Focus: First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies Aims to deliver high-quality research Content: Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews Covers clinical, basic, and translational research Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信