医疗保险受益人出院后初级保健随访的差距。

Timothy S Anderson, John Z Ayanian, Shoshana J Herzig, Jeffrey Souza, Bruce E Landon
{"title":"医疗保险受益人出院后初级保健随访的差距。","authors":"Timothy S Anderson, John Z Ayanian, Shoshana J Herzig, Jeffrey Souza, Bruce E Landon","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely primary care follow-up after hospitalization is recommended to monitor recovery and coordinate care. Whether follow-up differs for vulnerable populations, such as those with frailty and those discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNF) prior to returning home, is not known.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using a 100% sample of traditional Medicare beneficiaries discharged from hospital to home or from hospital to SNF and then home, between 2010 and 2022. The primary outcome was the receipt of a primary care visit within 30 days of return to home, measured overall and stratified by disposition (discharged home vs. to SNF then home) and by frailty (defined by a claims-based frailty index). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate changes in outcomes over time, overall and stratified by disposition and frailty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 94,248,326 discharges (80.1% age ≥ 65 years, 55.1% female, 36.7% frail) of which 21.5% were discharged to SNF and then home. Between 2010 and 2022, primary care follow-up increased from 51.5% to 57.5% for patients discharged directly home and from 24.3% to 28.4% for patients discharged to SNF then home. In adjusted analyses, compared to those discharged directly home, patients discharged to SNF and then home had an 8.2% point (pp) (95% CI, -8.5 to -7.9) lower predicted probability of ambulatory follow-up in 2022. Among patients discharged directly home, no difference was evident in follow-up between frail and non-frail patients (54.6% vs. 54.1%); difference 0.4 pp (95% CI, -0.1 to 1.0). In contrast, among patients discharged to SNF then home, frail patients had a lower predicted probability of follow-up (42.8% vs. 48.9%); difference - 6.1 pp (95% CI, -7.0 to -5.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frail patients and patients requiring a short-term SNF stay after hospitalization are less likely to receive timely follow-up upon return to home than other patient groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gaps in Primary Care Follow-Up After Hospital Discharge Among Medicare Beneficiaries.\",\"authors\":\"Timothy S Anderson, John Z Ayanian, Shoshana J Herzig, Jeffrey Souza, Bruce E Landon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely primary care follow-up after hospitalization is recommended to monitor recovery and coordinate care. Whether follow-up differs for vulnerable populations, such as those with frailty and those discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNF) prior to returning home, is not known.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using a 100% sample of traditional Medicare beneficiaries discharged from hospital to home or from hospital to SNF and then home, between 2010 and 2022. The primary outcome was the receipt of a primary care visit within 30 days of return to home, measured overall and stratified by disposition (discharged home vs. to SNF then home) and by frailty (defined by a claims-based frailty index). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate changes in outcomes over time, overall and stratified by disposition and frailty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 94,248,326 discharges (80.1% age ≥ 65 years, 55.1% female, 36.7% frail) of which 21.5% were discharged to SNF and then home. Between 2010 and 2022, primary care follow-up increased from 51.5% to 57.5% for patients discharged directly home and from 24.3% to 28.4% for patients discharged to SNF then home. In adjusted analyses, compared to those discharged directly home, patients discharged to SNF and then home had an 8.2% point (pp) (95% CI, -8.5 to -7.9) lower predicted probability of ambulatory follow-up in 2022. Among patients discharged directly home, no difference was evident in follow-up between frail and non-frail patients (54.6% vs. 54.1%); difference 0.4 pp (95% CI, -0.1 to 1.0). In contrast, among patients discharged to SNF then home, frail patients had a lower predicted probability of follow-up (42.8% vs. 48.9%); difference - 6.1 pp (95% CI, -7.0 to -5.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frail patients and patients requiring a short-term SNF stay after hospitalization are less likely to receive timely follow-up upon return to home than other patient groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19496\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:建议在住院后及时进行初级保健随访,以监测康复情况并协调护理。目前尚不清楚对脆弱人群(如体弱多病者和在回家前出院到专业护理机构(SNF)的人)的随访是否有所不同。方法:回顾性队列研究,使用2010年至2022年间100%的传统医疗保险受益人从医院出院回家或从医院到SNF再回家。主要结果是在回家后30天内接受一次初级保健访问,并根据处置情况(出院回家vs. SNF然后回家)和虚弱程度(由基于索赔的虚弱指数定义)进行总体测量和分层。使用多变量逻辑回归模型来估计结果随时间的变化,总体和按性格和虚弱分层。结果:该队列包括94,248,326例出院患者(80.1%年龄≥65岁,55.1%女性,36.7%体弱),其中21.5%出院至SNF然后回家。2010年至2022年间,直接回家的患者初级保健随访率从51.5%上升到57.5%,再回家的患者从24.3%上升到28.4%。在调整分析中,与直接回家的患者相比,出院到SNF然后回家的患者在2022年预测的动态随访概率低8.2% (pp, 95% CI, -8.5至-7.9)。在直接出院的患者中,体弱和非体弱患者的随访无明显差异(54.6%对54.1%);差异0.4 pp (95% CI, -0.1 ~ 1.0)。相比之下,在出院到SNF然后回家的患者中,体弱患者的预测随访概率较低(42.8%比48.9%);差异- 6.1 pp (95% CI, -7.0至-5.2)。结论:体弱患者和住院后需要短期SNF的患者在返回家中时获得及时随访的可能性低于其他患者群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gaps in Primary Care Follow-Up After Hospital Discharge Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

Background: Timely primary care follow-up after hospitalization is recommended to monitor recovery and coordinate care. Whether follow-up differs for vulnerable populations, such as those with frailty and those discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNF) prior to returning home, is not known.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study using a 100% sample of traditional Medicare beneficiaries discharged from hospital to home or from hospital to SNF and then home, between 2010 and 2022. The primary outcome was the receipt of a primary care visit within 30 days of return to home, measured overall and stratified by disposition (discharged home vs. to SNF then home) and by frailty (defined by a claims-based frailty index). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate changes in outcomes over time, overall and stratified by disposition and frailty.

Results: The cohort included 94,248,326 discharges (80.1% age ≥ 65 years, 55.1% female, 36.7% frail) of which 21.5% were discharged to SNF and then home. Between 2010 and 2022, primary care follow-up increased from 51.5% to 57.5% for patients discharged directly home and from 24.3% to 28.4% for patients discharged to SNF then home. In adjusted analyses, compared to those discharged directly home, patients discharged to SNF and then home had an 8.2% point (pp) (95% CI, -8.5 to -7.9) lower predicted probability of ambulatory follow-up in 2022. Among patients discharged directly home, no difference was evident in follow-up between frail and non-frail patients (54.6% vs. 54.1%); difference 0.4 pp (95% CI, -0.1 to 1.0). In contrast, among patients discharged to SNF then home, frail patients had a lower predicted probability of follow-up (42.8% vs. 48.9%); difference - 6.1 pp (95% CI, -7.0 to -5.2).

Conclusions: Frail patients and patients requiring a short-term SNF stay after hospitalization are less likely to receive timely follow-up upon return to home than other patient groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信