产妇残疾和急诊部门对婴儿的使用。

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hilary K Brown, Yona Lunsky, Kinwah Fung, Maria Santiago-Jimenez, Andi Camden, Eyal Cohen, Joel G Ray, Natasha R Saunders, Deanna Telner, Catherine E Varner, Simone N Vigod, Jennifer Zwicker, Astrid Guttmann
{"title":"产妇残疾和急诊部门对婴儿的使用。","authors":"Hilary K Brown, Yona Lunsky, Kinwah Fung, Maria Santiago-Jimenez, Andi Camden, Eyal Cohen, Joel G Ray, Natasha R Saunders, Deanna Telner, Catherine E Varner, Simone N Vigod, Jennifer Zwicker, Astrid Guttmann","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Infants have among the highest rates of emergency department (ED) visits of all age groups. Women with disabilities experience significant social disparities, may experience barriers accessing child primary care, and may seek care in the ED.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare ED use among newborns and infants (hereafter infants) of women with or without disabilities, overall and by timing and acuity of the ED visit.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This population-based cohort study analyzed data for all live-born infants in Ontario, Canada, born to women with or without a disability from April 1, 2008, to March 31, 2021. Data were analyzed March 2023 to October 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Maternal physical, sensory, or intellectual or developmental disability or multiple disabilities status was ascertained using diagnostic algorithms applied to health care encounters before delivery.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The main outcome was any ED visit between an infant's hospitalization discharge date and their first birthday, and by timing and acuity. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to generate hazard ratios (HRs) for the association between maternal disability and the main outcome, adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and infant sex and year of birth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1 596 932 total infants, there were 139 698 (8.7%) born to women with a physical disability, 48 112 (3.0%) to women with a sensory disability, 2547 (0.2%) to women with an intellectual or developmental disability, and 10 312 (0.6%) to women with multiple disabilities. The remaining 1 396 263 infants (87.4%) were born to a woman without a recognized disability. Among women without a disability, 558 965 infants (40.0%) had an ED visit in the first year of life (incidence rate, 1.11 per 1000 person-days). Compared with this referent group, infants born to a woman with a disability of a physical (46.9%; 1.30 visits per 1000 person-days; adjusted HR [AHR], 1.14 [95% CI, 1.13-1.15]), sensory (45.2%; 1.25 visits per 1000 person-days; AHR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.07-1.10]), or intellectual or developmental (55.4%; 1.55 visits per 1000 person-days; AHR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.17-1.30]) nature or with multiple disabilities (51.0%; 1.42 visits per 1000 person-days; AHR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.15-1.22]) were more likely to have an ED visit. Similar patterns were observed for ED visits at fewer than 28 days from delivery, from 28 to 365 days, and for ED visits for high-acuity, moderate-acuity, and low-acuity reasons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this population-based cohort study, infants of women with disabilities were more likely to use the ED, indicating a need for accessible family supports and improved early child primary care access.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 5","pages":"e258549"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12053526/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal Disability and Emergency Department Use for Infants.\",\"authors\":\"Hilary K Brown, Yona Lunsky, Kinwah Fung, Maria Santiago-Jimenez, Andi Camden, Eyal Cohen, Joel G Ray, Natasha R Saunders, Deanna Telner, Catherine E Varner, Simone N Vigod, Jennifer Zwicker, Astrid Guttmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Infants have among the highest rates of emergency department (ED) visits of all age groups. Women with disabilities experience significant social disparities, may experience barriers accessing child primary care, and may seek care in the ED.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare ED use among newborns and infants (hereafter infants) of women with or without disabilities, overall and by timing and acuity of the ED visit.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This population-based cohort study analyzed data for all live-born infants in Ontario, Canada, born to women with or without a disability from April 1, 2008, to March 31, 2021. Data were analyzed March 2023 to October 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Maternal physical, sensory, or intellectual or developmental disability or multiple disabilities status was ascertained using diagnostic algorithms applied to health care encounters before delivery.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The main outcome was any ED visit between an infant's hospitalization discharge date and their first birthday, and by timing and acuity. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to generate hazard ratios (HRs) for the association between maternal disability and the main outcome, adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and infant sex and year of birth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1 596 932 total infants, there were 139 698 (8.7%) born to women with a physical disability, 48 112 (3.0%) to women with a sensory disability, 2547 (0.2%) to women with an intellectual or developmental disability, and 10 312 (0.6%) to women with multiple disabilities. The remaining 1 396 263 infants (87.4%) were born to a woman without a recognized disability. Among women without a disability, 558 965 infants (40.0%) had an ED visit in the first year of life (incidence rate, 1.11 per 1000 person-days). Compared with this referent group, infants born to a woman with a disability of a physical (46.9%; 1.30 visits per 1000 person-days; adjusted HR [AHR], 1.14 [95% CI, 1.13-1.15]), sensory (45.2%; 1.25 visits per 1000 person-days; AHR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.07-1.10]), or intellectual or developmental (55.4%; 1.55 visits per 1000 person-days; AHR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.17-1.30]) nature or with multiple disabilities (51.0%; 1.42 visits per 1000 person-days; AHR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.15-1.22]) were more likely to have an ED visit. Similar patterns were observed for ED visits at fewer than 28 days from delivery, from 28 to 365 days, and for ED visits for high-acuity, moderate-acuity, and low-acuity reasons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this population-based cohort study, infants of women with disabilities were more likely to use the ED, indicating a need for accessible family supports and improved early child primary care access.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"volume\":\"8 5\",\"pages\":\"e258549\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12053526/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8549\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8549","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:婴儿在所有年龄组中急诊科(ED)访问量最高。残疾妇女经历了显著的社会差异,可能在获得儿童初级保健方面遇到障碍,并可能在ED中寻求护理。目的:比较残疾妇女和非残疾妇女的新生儿和婴儿(以下简称婴儿)的ED使用情况,总体上,通过ED访问的时间和灵敏度进行比较。设计、环境和参与者:这项基于人群的队列研究分析了2008年4月1日至2021年3月31日期间加拿大安大略省所有有残疾或无残疾妇女所生的活产婴儿的数据。数据分析时间为2023年3月至2024年10月。暴露:使用产前保健就诊的诊断算法确定产妇身体、感觉或智力或发育残疾或多重残疾状态。主要结局和措施:主要结局是婴儿在出院日期和一岁生日之间的任何急诊科就诊,以及时间和视力。采用Cox比例风险回归,根据社会人口统计学特征、婴儿性别和出生年份进行调整,得出产妇残疾与主要结局之间关联的风险比(hr)。结果:1 596 932名婴儿中,身体残疾妇女139 698名(8.7%),感觉残疾妇女48 112名(3.0%),智力或发育残疾妇女2547名(0.2%),多重残疾妇女10 312名(0.6%)。其余1 396 263名婴儿(87.4%)是由无公认残疾的妇女所生。在没有残疾的妇女中,558 965名婴儿(40.0%)在出生后的第一年接受过急诊科就诊(发病率为1.11 / 1000人天)。与这一参照组相比,身体残疾妇女所生的婴儿(46.9%;每1000人次每日1.30人次;调整HR [AHR], 1.14 [95% CI, 1.13-1.15]),感官(45.2%;每1000人日1.25人次;AHR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.07-1.10]),或智力或发育(55.4%;每1000人次日1.55人次;AHR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.17-1.30])或多重残疾(51.0%;每千人次日1.42人次;AHR (1.18 [95% CI, 1.15-1.22])更有可能去急诊室就诊。在分娩后不到28天、28天至365天以及因高、中、低视力原因就诊的患者中,也观察到类似的模式。结论和相关性:在这项基于人群的队列研究中,残疾妇女的婴儿更有可能使用急诊科,这表明需要提供可获得的家庭支持和改善早期儿童初级保健的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maternal Disability and Emergency Department Use for Infants.

Importance: Infants have among the highest rates of emergency department (ED) visits of all age groups. Women with disabilities experience significant social disparities, may experience barriers accessing child primary care, and may seek care in the ED.

Objective: To compare ED use among newborns and infants (hereafter infants) of women with or without disabilities, overall and by timing and acuity of the ED visit.

Design, setting, and participants: This population-based cohort study analyzed data for all live-born infants in Ontario, Canada, born to women with or without a disability from April 1, 2008, to March 31, 2021. Data were analyzed March 2023 to October 2024.

Exposure: Maternal physical, sensory, or intellectual or developmental disability or multiple disabilities status was ascertained using diagnostic algorithms applied to health care encounters before delivery.

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcome was any ED visit between an infant's hospitalization discharge date and their first birthday, and by timing and acuity. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to generate hazard ratios (HRs) for the association between maternal disability and the main outcome, adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and infant sex and year of birth.

Results: Of 1 596 932 total infants, there were 139 698 (8.7%) born to women with a physical disability, 48 112 (3.0%) to women with a sensory disability, 2547 (0.2%) to women with an intellectual or developmental disability, and 10 312 (0.6%) to women with multiple disabilities. The remaining 1 396 263 infants (87.4%) were born to a woman without a recognized disability. Among women without a disability, 558 965 infants (40.0%) had an ED visit in the first year of life (incidence rate, 1.11 per 1000 person-days). Compared with this referent group, infants born to a woman with a disability of a physical (46.9%; 1.30 visits per 1000 person-days; adjusted HR [AHR], 1.14 [95% CI, 1.13-1.15]), sensory (45.2%; 1.25 visits per 1000 person-days; AHR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.07-1.10]), or intellectual or developmental (55.4%; 1.55 visits per 1000 person-days; AHR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.17-1.30]) nature or with multiple disabilities (51.0%; 1.42 visits per 1000 person-days; AHR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.15-1.22]) were more likely to have an ED visit. Similar patterns were observed for ED visits at fewer than 28 days from delivery, from 28 to 365 days, and for ED visits for high-acuity, moderate-acuity, and low-acuity reasons.

Conclusions and relevance: In this population-based cohort study, infants of women with disabilities were more likely to use the ED, indicating a need for accessible family supports and improved early child primary care access.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信