黎巴嫩国家卫生技术评估的需求评估和差距分析。

Christiane Maskineh, Sizar Akoum, Randa Attieh, Reina Alameddine, Alissar Rady, Michèle Kosremelli Asmar
{"title":"黎巴嫩国家卫生技术评估的需求评估和差距分析。","authors":"Christiane Maskineh, Sizar Akoum, Randa Attieh, Reina Alameddine, Alissar Rady, Michèle Kosremelli Asmar","doi":"10.26719/2025.31.3.176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Developing countries are increasingly adopting health technology assessment as a critical tool for evaluating and addressing challenges related to the use of health technologies in support of Universal Health Coverage, health equity and resource allocation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To map health technology assessment resources and identify barriers to national health technology assessments in Lebanon.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a questionnaire survey and focus group discussions, we collected data from key informants who had interest in health technology assessment in Lebanon between May and July 2017 and in July 2018. We analysed the quantitative data descriptively using Microsoft Excel and the qualitative data using NVivo version 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty participants completed the questionnaire and 34 attended the focus group discussions. Participants mentioned reimbursement for the use of health technologies and production of clinical guidelines as top priorities for health technology assessment and mentioned the lack of collaboration nationally and lack of agreement among relevant stakeholders as the topmost barriers to assessments. They mentioned safety and effectiveness as the main parameters to be considered in assessments, followed by quality-of-life and burden of illness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from this study support the need for health technology assessments in Lebanon, beginning with the creation of a national autonomous multidisciplinary entity that will facilitate synergy and consensus-building for the assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":93985,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Mediterranean health journal = La revue de sante de la Mediterranee orientale = al-Majallah al-sihhiyah li-sharq al-mutawassit","volume":"31 3","pages":"176-181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Needs assessment and gap analysis for national health technology assessments in Lebanon.\",\"authors\":\"Christiane Maskineh, Sizar Akoum, Randa Attieh, Reina Alameddine, Alissar Rady, Michèle Kosremelli Asmar\",\"doi\":\"10.26719/2025.31.3.176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Developing countries are increasingly adopting health technology assessment as a critical tool for evaluating and addressing challenges related to the use of health technologies in support of Universal Health Coverage, health equity and resource allocation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To map health technology assessment resources and identify barriers to national health technology assessments in Lebanon.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a questionnaire survey and focus group discussions, we collected data from key informants who had interest in health technology assessment in Lebanon between May and July 2017 and in July 2018. We analysed the quantitative data descriptively using Microsoft Excel and the qualitative data using NVivo version 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty participants completed the questionnaire and 34 attended the focus group discussions. Participants mentioned reimbursement for the use of health technologies and production of clinical guidelines as top priorities for health technology assessment and mentioned the lack of collaboration nationally and lack of agreement among relevant stakeholders as the topmost barriers to assessments. They mentioned safety and effectiveness as the main parameters to be considered in assessments, followed by quality-of-life and burden of illness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from this study support the need for health technology assessments in Lebanon, beginning with the creation of a national autonomous multidisciplinary entity that will facilitate synergy and consensus-building for the assessments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eastern Mediterranean health journal = La revue de sante de la Mediterranee orientale = al-Majallah al-sihhiyah li-sharq al-mutawassit\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"176-181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eastern Mediterranean health journal = La revue de sante de la Mediterranee orientale = al-Majallah al-sihhiyah li-sharq al-mutawassit\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26719/2025.31.3.176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eastern Mediterranean health journal = La revue de sante de la Mediterranee orientale = al-Majallah al-sihhiyah li-sharq al-mutawassit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26719/2025.31.3.176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:发展中国家越来越多地采用卫生技术评估作为评估和应对与使用卫生技术支持全民健康覆盖、卫生公平和资源分配有关的挑战的关键工具。目的:绘制黎巴嫩卫生技术评估资源分布图,确定黎巴嫩国家卫生技术评估的障碍。方法:采用问卷调查和焦点小组讨论的方法,收集2017年5月至7月和2018年7月对黎巴嫩卫生技术评估感兴趣的关键举报人的数据。定量数据采用Microsoft Excel进行描述性分析,定性数据采用NVivo version 12进行分析。结果:20名参与者完成问卷调查,34名参与者参加焦点小组讨论。与会者提到,偿还卫生技术的使用费用和制定临床准则是卫生技术评估的首要优先事项,并提到缺乏国家协作和相关利益攸关方之间缺乏协议是评估的最大障碍。他们提到安全性和有效性是评估中要考虑的主要参数,其次是生活质量和疾病负担。结论:本研究的结果支持黎巴嫩需要进行卫生技术评估,首先是建立一个国家自主的多学科实体,以促进评估的协同作用和建立共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Needs assessment and gap analysis for national health technology assessments in Lebanon.

Background: Developing countries are increasingly adopting health technology assessment as a critical tool for evaluating and addressing challenges related to the use of health technologies in support of Universal Health Coverage, health equity and resource allocation.

Aim: To map health technology assessment resources and identify barriers to national health technology assessments in Lebanon.

Methods: Using a questionnaire survey and focus group discussions, we collected data from key informants who had interest in health technology assessment in Lebanon between May and July 2017 and in July 2018. We analysed the quantitative data descriptively using Microsoft Excel and the qualitative data using NVivo version 12.

Results: Twenty participants completed the questionnaire and 34 attended the focus group discussions. Participants mentioned reimbursement for the use of health technologies and production of clinical guidelines as top priorities for health technology assessment and mentioned the lack of collaboration nationally and lack of agreement among relevant stakeholders as the topmost barriers to assessments. They mentioned safety and effectiveness as the main parameters to be considered in assessments, followed by quality-of-life and burden of illness.

Conclusion: Findings from this study support the need for health technology assessments in Lebanon, beginning with the creation of a national autonomous multidisciplinary entity that will facilitate synergy and consensus-building for the assessments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信