局部晚期胰腺癌的手术和新辅助治疗:生存率、切除结果和成本效益的综合回顾。

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Gland surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-31 Epub Date: 2025-03-26 DOI:10.21037/gs-24-421
Yun Zhao, Hwee Leong Tan, Darren Weiquan Chua, Brian Kim Poh Goh, Ye Xin Koh
{"title":"局部晚期胰腺癌的手术和新辅助治疗:生存率、切除结果和成本效益的综合回顾。","authors":"Yun Zhao, Hwee Leong Tan, Darren Weiquan Chua, Brian Kim Poh Goh, Ye Xin Koh","doi":"10.21037/gs-24-421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis, particularly for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has emerged as a promising strategy to improve resectability and survival outcomes in LAPC. This umbrella review aimed to synthesize the available evidence on the effectiveness of NAT and surgical interventions in LAPC, focusing on resection and R0 resection rates and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024565454). A comprehensive literature search was conducted in June 2024 across four databases. Studies reporting on NAT and/or surgery in LAPC were selected, and the methodological quality of each meta-analysis was assessed using the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) tool. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was performed comparing FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel as NAT regimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine systematic reviews with meta-analyses published between 2014 and 2023 were included. They covered a variety of treatment strategies, including NAT followed by resection, induction therapy comparing FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, and different surgical techniques. FOLFIRINOX demonstrated significantly higher R0 resection rates [risk ratio (RR): 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60-0.97, P<0.05] and improved OS compared to gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel [hazard ratio (HR): 0.68, 95% CI: 0.46-0.99, P<0.05]. Surgical resection following NAT was associated with significantly better survival outcomes than induction therapy alone or palliative treatments. The CEA revealed that FOLFIRINOX, despite its higher cost, yielded an incremental OS benefit of 5.19 months and maintained a 60-63% probability of being cost-effective within a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000 per additional month of OS gained.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights the superior efficacy of FOLFIRINOX as a NAT regimen for LAPC, particularly in increasing resectability and R0 resection rates. Combining NAT with surgery offers significant survival benefits, making this strategy a standard of care for eligible LAPC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12760,"journal":{"name":"Gland surgery","volume":"14 3","pages":"529-542"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgery and neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an umbrella review of survival, resection outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.\",\"authors\":\"Yun Zhao, Hwee Leong Tan, Darren Weiquan Chua, Brian Kim Poh Goh, Ye Xin Koh\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/gs-24-421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis, particularly for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has emerged as a promising strategy to improve resectability and survival outcomes in LAPC. This umbrella review aimed to synthesize the available evidence on the effectiveness of NAT and surgical interventions in LAPC, focusing on resection and R0 resection rates and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024565454). A comprehensive literature search was conducted in June 2024 across four databases. Studies reporting on NAT and/or surgery in LAPC were selected, and the methodological quality of each meta-analysis was assessed using the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) tool. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was performed comparing FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel as NAT regimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine systematic reviews with meta-analyses published between 2014 and 2023 were included. They covered a variety of treatment strategies, including NAT followed by resection, induction therapy comparing FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, and different surgical techniques. FOLFIRINOX demonstrated significantly higher R0 resection rates [risk ratio (RR): 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60-0.97, P<0.05] and improved OS compared to gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel [hazard ratio (HR): 0.68, 95% CI: 0.46-0.99, P<0.05]. Surgical resection following NAT was associated with significantly better survival outcomes than induction therapy alone or palliative treatments. The CEA revealed that FOLFIRINOX, despite its higher cost, yielded an incremental OS benefit of 5.19 months and maintained a 60-63% probability of being cost-effective within a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000 per additional month of OS gained.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights the superior efficacy of FOLFIRINOX as a NAT regimen for LAPC, particularly in increasing resectability and R0 resection rates. Combining NAT with surgery offers significant survival benefits, making this strategy a standard of care for eligible LAPC patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gland surgery\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"529-542\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004333/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gland surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-24-421\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gland surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-24-421","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)是一种预后不良的侵袭性恶性肿瘤,尤其是局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC)患者。新辅助治疗(NAT)已成为一种有前途的策略,以提高LAPC的可切除性和生存结果。本综述旨在综合现有证据,证明NAT和手术干预在LAPC中的有效性,重点关注切除术和R0切除率和总生存率(OS)。方法:本研究在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024565454)。2024年6月,对四个数据库进行了全面的文献检索。选择报告LAPC中NAT和/或手术的研究,并使用A测量工具评估系统评价2 (AMSTAR-2)工具评估每个荟萃分析的方法学质量。对FOLFIRINOX(亚叶酸钙、氟尿嘧啶、伊立替康和奥沙利铂)和吉西他滨/nab-紫杉醇作为NAT方案进行了成本-效果分析(CEA)。结果:纳入2014年至2023年间发表的9篇系统综述和荟萃分析。他们涵盖了各种治疗策略,包括NAT后切除术,比较FOLFIRINOX与吉西他滨/nab-紫杉醇的诱导治疗,以及不同的手术技术。FOLFIRINOX显示出明显更高的R0切除率[风险比(RR): 0.77, 95%可信区间(CI): 0.60-0.97],结论:本综述强调了FOLFIRINOX作为LAPC NAT治疗方案的优越疗效,特别是在提高可切除性和R0切除率方面。NAT与手术相结合提供了显著的生存效益,使该策略成为符合条件的LAPC患者的标准护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgery and neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an umbrella review of survival, resection outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis, particularly for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has emerged as a promising strategy to improve resectability and survival outcomes in LAPC. This umbrella review aimed to synthesize the available evidence on the effectiveness of NAT and surgical interventions in LAPC, focusing on resection and R0 resection rates and overall survival (OS).

Methods: This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024565454). A comprehensive literature search was conducted in June 2024 across four databases. Studies reporting on NAT and/or surgery in LAPC were selected, and the methodological quality of each meta-analysis was assessed using the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) tool. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was performed comparing FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel as NAT regimens.

Results: Nine systematic reviews with meta-analyses published between 2014 and 2023 were included. They covered a variety of treatment strategies, including NAT followed by resection, induction therapy comparing FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, and different surgical techniques. FOLFIRINOX demonstrated significantly higher R0 resection rates [risk ratio (RR): 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60-0.97, P<0.05] and improved OS compared to gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel [hazard ratio (HR): 0.68, 95% CI: 0.46-0.99, P<0.05]. Surgical resection following NAT was associated with significantly better survival outcomes than induction therapy alone or palliative treatments. The CEA revealed that FOLFIRINOX, despite its higher cost, yielded an incremental OS benefit of 5.19 months and maintained a 60-63% probability of being cost-effective within a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000 per additional month of OS gained.

Conclusions: This review highlights the superior efficacy of FOLFIRINOX as a NAT regimen for LAPC, particularly in increasing resectability and R0 resection rates. Combining NAT with surgery offers significant survival benefits, making this strategy a standard of care for eligible LAPC patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gland surgery
Gland surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Gland Surgery (Gland Surg; GS, Print ISSN 2227-684X; Online ISSN 2227-8575) being indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central, is an open access, peer-review journal launched at May of 2012, published bio-monthly since February 2015.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信