Carmen E Guerra, Jennifer Keating Litton, Carolina E Viswanath, A Mark Fendrick
{"title":"十字路口的多癌早期检测测试:在确定证据之前的商业可用性。","authors":"Carmen E Guerra, Jennifer Keating Litton, Carolina E Viswanath, A Mark Fendrick","doi":"10.1200/EDBK-25-473834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multicancer early detection tests (MCEDs), sometimes referred to as liquid biopsies, are tests that can screen for multiple cancers by analyzing blood, urine, and other bodily fluids for biomarkers released by cancer cells. These tests have the potential to change the cancer screening paradigm if they are shown to reduce cancer mortality. However, it is not yet known whether MCEDs reduce mortality. Randomized controlled trials, the gold standard for evaluating cancer screening programs, are currently evaluating the effectiveness of MCEDs. However, because cancer-specific and all-cause mortality are end points that can take years to reach, trials are being designed with surrogate end points such as stage of disease at detection. However, the correlation between cancer stage and survival appears to vary by cancer type, and many have argued that trials must also continue to follow for the gold standard of mortality end points until these surrogate end points are appropriately validated. The widespread use of MCEDs before conclusive evidence supporting their use has the potential to cause harm to patients, could widen health inequities, and further drive health care costs. Consequently, providers should engage in shared decision making regarding MCED tests with patients who inquire about MCEDs emphasizing that MCEDs should be additive to, not replacements for, the currently recommended cancer screening tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":37969,"journal":{"name":"American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting","volume":"45 3","pages":"e473834"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicancer Early Detection Tests at a Crossroads: Commercial Availability Ahead of Definitive Evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Carmen E Guerra, Jennifer Keating Litton, Carolina E Viswanath, A Mark Fendrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/EDBK-25-473834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multicancer early detection tests (MCEDs), sometimes referred to as liquid biopsies, are tests that can screen for multiple cancers by analyzing blood, urine, and other bodily fluids for biomarkers released by cancer cells. These tests have the potential to change the cancer screening paradigm if they are shown to reduce cancer mortality. However, it is not yet known whether MCEDs reduce mortality. Randomized controlled trials, the gold standard for evaluating cancer screening programs, are currently evaluating the effectiveness of MCEDs. However, because cancer-specific and all-cause mortality are end points that can take years to reach, trials are being designed with surrogate end points such as stage of disease at detection. However, the correlation between cancer stage and survival appears to vary by cancer type, and many have argued that trials must also continue to follow for the gold standard of mortality end points until these surrogate end points are appropriately validated. The widespread use of MCEDs before conclusive evidence supporting their use has the potential to cause harm to patients, could widen health inequities, and further drive health care costs. Consequently, providers should engage in shared decision making regarding MCED tests with patients who inquire about MCEDs emphasizing that MCEDs should be additive to, not replacements for, the currently recommended cancer screening tests.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting\",\"volume\":\"45 3\",\"pages\":\"e473834\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK-25-473834\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK-25-473834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multicancer Early Detection Tests at a Crossroads: Commercial Availability Ahead of Definitive Evidence.
Multicancer early detection tests (MCEDs), sometimes referred to as liquid biopsies, are tests that can screen for multiple cancers by analyzing blood, urine, and other bodily fluids for biomarkers released by cancer cells. These tests have the potential to change the cancer screening paradigm if they are shown to reduce cancer mortality. However, it is not yet known whether MCEDs reduce mortality. Randomized controlled trials, the gold standard for evaluating cancer screening programs, are currently evaluating the effectiveness of MCEDs. However, because cancer-specific and all-cause mortality are end points that can take years to reach, trials are being designed with surrogate end points such as stage of disease at detection. However, the correlation between cancer stage and survival appears to vary by cancer type, and many have argued that trials must also continue to follow for the gold standard of mortality end points until these surrogate end points are appropriately validated. The widespread use of MCEDs before conclusive evidence supporting their use has the potential to cause harm to patients, could widen health inequities, and further drive health care costs. Consequently, providers should engage in shared decision making regarding MCED tests with patients who inquire about MCEDs emphasizing that MCEDs should be additive to, not replacements for, the currently recommended cancer screening tests.
期刊介绍:
The Ed Book is a National Library of Medicine–indexed collection of articles written by ASCO Annual Meeting faculty and invited leaders in oncology. Ed Book was launched in 1985 to highlight standards of care and inspire future therapeutic possibilities in oncology. Published annually, each volume highlights the most compelling research and developments across the multidisciplinary fields of oncology and serves as an enduring scholarly resource for all members of the cancer care team long after the Meeting concludes. These articles address issues in the following areas, among others: Immuno-oncology, Surgical, radiation, and medical oncology, Clinical informatics and quality of care, Global health, Survivorship.