十字路口的多癌早期检测测试:在确定证据之前的商业可用性。

Q1 Medicine
Carmen E Guerra, Jennifer Keating Litton, Carolina E Viswanath, A Mark Fendrick
{"title":"十字路口的多癌早期检测测试:在确定证据之前的商业可用性。","authors":"Carmen E Guerra, Jennifer Keating Litton, Carolina E Viswanath, A Mark Fendrick","doi":"10.1200/EDBK-25-473834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multicancer early detection tests (MCEDs), sometimes referred to as liquid biopsies, are tests that can screen for multiple cancers by analyzing blood, urine, and other bodily fluids for biomarkers released by cancer cells. These tests have the potential to change the cancer screening paradigm if they are shown to reduce cancer mortality. However, it is not yet known whether MCEDs reduce mortality. Randomized controlled trials, the gold standard for evaluating cancer screening programs, are currently evaluating the effectiveness of MCEDs. However, because cancer-specific and all-cause mortality are end points that can take years to reach, trials are being designed with surrogate end points such as stage of disease at detection. However, the correlation between cancer stage and survival appears to vary by cancer type, and many have argued that trials must also continue to follow for the gold standard of mortality end points until these surrogate end points are appropriately validated. The widespread use of MCEDs before conclusive evidence supporting their use has the potential to cause harm to patients, could widen health inequities, and further drive health care costs. Consequently, providers should engage in shared decision making regarding MCED tests with patients who inquire about MCEDs emphasizing that MCEDs should be additive to, not replacements for, the currently recommended cancer screening tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":37969,"journal":{"name":"American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting","volume":"45 3","pages":"e473834"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicancer Early Detection Tests at a Crossroads: Commercial Availability Ahead of Definitive Evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Carmen E Guerra, Jennifer Keating Litton, Carolina E Viswanath, A Mark Fendrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/EDBK-25-473834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multicancer early detection tests (MCEDs), sometimes referred to as liquid biopsies, are tests that can screen for multiple cancers by analyzing blood, urine, and other bodily fluids for biomarkers released by cancer cells. These tests have the potential to change the cancer screening paradigm if they are shown to reduce cancer mortality. However, it is not yet known whether MCEDs reduce mortality. Randomized controlled trials, the gold standard for evaluating cancer screening programs, are currently evaluating the effectiveness of MCEDs. However, because cancer-specific and all-cause mortality are end points that can take years to reach, trials are being designed with surrogate end points such as stage of disease at detection. However, the correlation between cancer stage and survival appears to vary by cancer type, and many have argued that trials must also continue to follow for the gold standard of mortality end points until these surrogate end points are appropriately validated. The widespread use of MCEDs before conclusive evidence supporting their use has the potential to cause harm to patients, could widen health inequities, and further drive health care costs. Consequently, providers should engage in shared decision making regarding MCED tests with patients who inquire about MCEDs emphasizing that MCEDs should be additive to, not replacements for, the currently recommended cancer screening tests.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting\",\"volume\":\"45 3\",\"pages\":\"e473834\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK-25-473834\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK-25-473834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多癌早期检测测试(MCEDs),有时被称为液体活检,是通过分析血液、尿液和其他体液中癌细胞释放的生物标志物来筛查多种癌症的测试。如果这些检测被证明能够降低癌症死亡率,它们就有可能改变癌症筛查的模式。然而,目前尚不清楚mced是否能降低死亡率。随机对照试验是评估癌症筛查项目的黄金标准,目前正在评估mced的有效性。然而,由于癌症特异性和全因死亡率是可能需要数年才能达到的终点,因此正在设计具有替代终点的试验,例如检测时的疾病阶段。然而,癌症分期和生存率之间的相关性似乎因癌症类型而异,许多人认为,在这些替代终点得到适当验证之前,试验也必须继续遵循死亡率终点的金标准。在有确凿证据支持其使用之前,广泛使用多药促生药物有可能对患者造成伤害,可能扩大卫生不公平现象,并进一步推高卫生保健费用。因此,医疗服务提供者应与询问MCED的患者就MCED检测进行共同决策,强调MCED应作为目前推荐的癌症筛查检测的补充,而不是替代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multicancer Early Detection Tests at a Crossroads: Commercial Availability Ahead of Definitive Evidence.

Multicancer early detection tests (MCEDs), sometimes referred to as liquid biopsies, are tests that can screen for multiple cancers by analyzing blood, urine, and other bodily fluids for biomarkers released by cancer cells. These tests have the potential to change the cancer screening paradigm if they are shown to reduce cancer mortality. However, it is not yet known whether MCEDs reduce mortality. Randomized controlled trials, the gold standard for evaluating cancer screening programs, are currently evaluating the effectiveness of MCEDs. However, because cancer-specific and all-cause mortality are end points that can take years to reach, trials are being designed with surrogate end points such as stage of disease at detection. However, the correlation between cancer stage and survival appears to vary by cancer type, and many have argued that trials must also continue to follow for the gold standard of mortality end points until these surrogate end points are appropriately validated. The widespread use of MCEDs before conclusive evidence supporting their use has the potential to cause harm to patients, could widen health inequities, and further drive health care costs. Consequently, providers should engage in shared decision making regarding MCED tests with patients who inquire about MCEDs emphasizing that MCEDs should be additive to, not replacements for, the currently recommended cancer screening tests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Ed Book is a National Library of Medicine–indexed collection of articles written by ASCO Annual Meeting faculty and invited leaders in oncology. Ed Book was launched in 1985 to highlight standards of care and inspire future therapeutic possibilities in oncology. Published annually, each volume highlights the most compelling research and developments across the multidisciplinary fields of oncology and serves as an enduring scholarly resource for all members of the cancer care team long after the Meeting concludes. These articles address issues in the following areas, among others: Immuno-oncology, Surgical, radiation, and medical oncology, Clinical informatics and quality of care, Global health, Survivorship.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信