对疫苗接种的细分态度——罗马尼亚拒绝接种流感疫苗的行为洞察。

IF 1.7 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
GERMS Pub Date : 2024-12-31 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.18683/germs.2024.1446
Gheorghe Gindrovel Dumitra, Sandra Adalgiza Alexiu, Dorica Sănduţu, Cosmina Berbecel, Monica Curelea, Cristina Vasilica Barbu, Anca Deleanu, Adrian Grom, Maria Lup, Ioana Budiu, Mădălina Vesa, Roxana Surugiu, Anca Lăcătuş, Adina Turcu-Stiolica
{"title":"对疫苗接种的细分态度——罗马尼亚拒绝接种流感疫苗的行为洞察。","authors":"Gheorghe Gindrovel Dumitra, Sandra Adalgiza Alexiu, Dorica Sănduţu, Cosmina Berbecel, Monica Curelea, Cristina Vasilica Barbu, Anca Deleanu, Adrian Grom, Maria Lup, Ioana Budiu, Mădălina Vesa, Roxana Surugiu, Anca Lăcătuş, Adina Turcu-Stiolica","doi":"10.18683/germs.2024.1446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vaccine hesitancy remains a significant public health challenge, particularly in rural populations where geographic and socioeconomic barriers exacerbate the issue. This study aimed to examine the factors influencing vaccine hesitancy, focusing on influenza vaccinations in rural and urban communities in Romania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted between October 4 and October 30, 2024, across 16 family medicine practices, including seven in rural and nine in urban areas from Romania. A 13-item vaccine hesitancy questionnaire, assessing factors such as fear of adverse effects, distrust in vaccines, and perceived necessity included 272 responses. Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was used to identify distinct subgroups of hesitancy, while Chi-square and odds ratio analyses assessed geographic differences. We performed logistic regression for the most observed root attitudes on influenza vaccination refusal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rural residents were significantly more likely to refuse influenza vaccination compared to urban residents. The LCA revealed three distinct latent classes, characterized by varying levels of agreement with key hesitancy items. Class 1 demonstrated low hesitancy, Class 2 exhibited high hesitancy driven by beliefs in natural immunity and perceived lack of necessity, and Class 3 showed intermediate hesitancy, influenced by distrust in vaccines and past negative experiences. Among the key significant triggers underlying vaccine refusal were fear of adverse effects, parental status, chronic diseases, and previous vaccination experiences, while factors such as age and gender showed limited impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vaccine hesitancy persists as a complex, multidimensional issue, with rural populations disproportionately affected. Targeted, context-specific interventions addressing key drivers such as distorted risk perception, fear of adverse effects and distrust in vaccines are critical for improving vaccination rates These findings underscore the importance of tailored public health strategies to promote equitable vaccine uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":45107,"journal":{"name":"GERMS","volume":"14 4","pages":"362-374"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Segmenting attitudes toward vaccination - behavioral insights into influenza vaccination refusal in Romania.\",\"authors\":\"Gheorghe Gindrovel Dumitra, Sandra Adalgiza Alexiu, Dorica Sănduţu, Cosmina Berbecel, Monica Curelea, Cristina Vasilica Barbu, Anca Deleanu, Adrian Grom, Maria Lup, Ioana Budiu, Mădălina Vesa, Roxana Surugiu, Anca Lăcătuş, Adina Turcu-Stiolica\",\"doi\":\"10.18683/germs.2024.1446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vaccine hesitancy remains a significant public health challenge, particularly in rural populations where geographic and socioeconomic barriers exacerbate the issue. This study aimed to examine the factors influencing vaccine hesitancy, focusing on influenza vaccinations in rural and urban communities in Romania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted between October 4 and October 30, 2024, across 16 family medicine practices, including seven in rural and nine in urban areas from Romania. A 13-item vaccine hesitancy questionnaire, assessing factors such as fear of adverse effects, distrust in vaccines, and perceived necessity included 272 responses. Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was used to identify distinct subgroups of hesitancy, while Chi-square and odds ratio analyses assessed geographic differences. We performed logistic regression for the most observed root attitudes on influenza vaccination refusal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rural residents were significantly more likely to refuse influenza vaccination compared to urban residents. The LCA revealed three distinct latent classes, characterized by varying levels of agreement with key hesitancy items. Class 1 demonstrated low hesitancy, Class 2 exhibited high hesitancy driven by beliefs in natural immunity and perceived lack of necessity, and Class 3 showed intermediate hesitancy, influenced by distrust in vaccines and past negative experiences. Among the key significant triggers underlying vaccine refusal were fear of adverse effects, parental status, chronic diseases, and previous vaccination experiences, while factors such as age and gender showed limited impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vaccine hesitancy persists as a complex, multidimensional issue, with rural populations disproportionately affected. Targeted, context-specific interventions addressing key drivers such as distorted risk perception, fear of adverse effects and distrust in vaccines are critical for improving vaccination rates These findings underscore the importance of tailored public health strategies to promote equitable vaccine uptake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GERMS\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"362-374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013666/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GERMS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18683/germs.2024.1446\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERMS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18683/germs.2024.1446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

疫苗犹豫仍然是一个重大的公共卫生挑战,特别是在地理和社会经济障碍加剧这一问题的农村人口中。本研究旨在研究影响疫苗犹豫的因素,重点关注罗马尼亚农村和城市社区的流感疫苗接种情况。方法:该研究于2024年10月4日至10月30日在罗马尼亚的16个家庭医学实践中进行,其中7个在农村,9个在城市。一份包含13个项目的疫苗犹豫问卷,评估诸如对不良反应的恐惧、对疫苗的不信任和认为的必要性等因素,包括272份答复。使用潜类分析(LCA)确定不同的犹豫亚组,而卡方分析和优势比分析评估地理差异。我们对大多数观察到的对流感疫苗接种拒绝的态度进行了逻辑回归。结果:农村居民拒绝接种流感疫苗的可能性明显高于城市居民。LCA显示了三种不同的潜在类别,其特征是与关键犹豫项目的一致程度不同。1类表现为低犹豫,2类表现为高犹豫,原因是相信自然免疫和认为缺乏必要性,3类表现为中等犹豫,原因是对疫苗的不信任和过去的负面经历。拒绝接种疫苗的主要诱发因素包括对不良反应的恐惧、父母状况、慢性病和以前的疫苗接种经历,而年龄和性别等因素的影响有限。结论:疫苗犹豫仍然是一个复杂的、多方面的问题,农村人口受到的影响尤为严重。针对扭曲的风险认知、对不良反应的恐惧和对疫苗的不信任等关键驱动因素的有针对性的、针对具体情况的干预措施对于提高疫苗接种率至关重要。这些研究结果强调了制定有针对性的公共卫生战略以促进公平接种疫苗的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Segmenting attitudes toward vaccination - behavioral insights into influenza vaccination refusal in Romania.

Introduction: Vaccine hesitancy remains a significant public health challenge, particularly in rural populations where geographic and socioeconomic barriers exacerbate the issue. This study aimed to examine the factors influencing vaccine hesitancy, focusing on influenza vaccinations in rural and urban communities in Romania.

Methods: The study was conducted between October 4 and October 30, 2024, across 16 family medicine practices, including seven in rural and nine in urban areas from Romania. A 13-item vaccine hesitancy questionnaire, assessing factors such as fear of adverse effects, distrust in vaccines, and perceived necessity included 272 responses. Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was used to identify distinct subgroups of hesitancy, while Chi-square and odds ratio analyses assessed geographic differences. We performed logistic regression for the most observed root attitudes on influenza vaccination refusal.

Results: Rural residents were significantly more likely to refuse influenza vaccination compared to urban residents. The LCA revealed three distinct latent classes, characterized by varying levels of agreement with key hesitancy items. Class 1 demonstrated low hesitancy, Class 2 exhibited high hesitancy driven by beliefs in natural immunity and perceived lack of necessity, and Class 3 showed intermediate hesitancy, influenced by distrust in vaccines and past negative experiences. Among the key significant triggers underlying vaccine refusal were fear of adverse effects, parental status, chronic diseases, and previous vaccination experiences, while factors such as age and gender showed limited impact.

Conclusions: Vaccine hesitancy persists as a complex, multidimensional issue, with rural populations disproportionately affected. Targeted, context-specific interventions addressing key drivers such as distorted risk perception, fear of adverse effects and distrust in vaccines are critical for improving vaccination rates These findings underscore the importance of tailored public health strategies to promote equitable vaccine uptake.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GERMS
GERMS INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信