Kim N Chi, Elena Castro, Gert Attard, Matthew R Smith, Shahneen Sandhu, Eleni Efstathiou, Guilhem Roubaud, Eric J Small, Andrea Pereira de Santana Gomes, Dana E Rathkopf, Marniza Saad, Howard Gurney, Wonho Jung, Won Kim, Shiva Dibaj, Daphne Wu, Jenny Zhang, Angela Lopez-Gitlitz, Peter Francis, David Olmos
{"title":"尼拉帕尼、醋酸阿比特龙加强的松治疗转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌:3期量级试验的最终总生存期分析","authors":"Kim N Chi, Elena Castro, Gert Attard, Matthew R Smith, Shahneen Sandhu, Eleni Efstathiou, Guilhem Roubaud, Eric J Small, Andrea Pereira de Santana Gomes, Dana E Rathkopf, Marniza Saad, Howard Gurney, Wonho Jung, Won Kim, Shiva Dibaj, Daphne Wu, Jenny Zhang, Angela Lopez-Gitlitz, Peter Francis, David Olmos","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The phase 3 MAGNITUDE trial previously met its primary endpoint of an improvement in radiographic progression-free survival with niraparib + abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) versus placebo + AAP in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and alterations in genes involved in DNA homologous recombination repair (HRR<sup>+</sup>), particularly in BRCA1/2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were prospectively screened for HRR alterations and randomized 1:1 to niraparib + AAP (n = 212) or placebo + AAP (n = 211). We report results from the prespecified, event-driven, final analysis of secondary efficacy endpoints.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Final analysis at median follow-up of 37.3 mo revealed no difference in overall survival (OS) between niraparib + AAP and placebo + AAP in the HRR<sup>+</sup> population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.931, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.720-1.203; p = 0.585) or the subgroup with BRCA1/2 alterations (HR 0.788, 95% CI 0.554-1.120; nominal p = 0.183). Prespecified multivariate analyses adjusted for baseline prognostic factors showed a trend toward longer OS with niraparib + AAP over placebo + AAP in the HRR<sup>+</sup> population (HR 0.785, 95% CI 0.606-1.016; nominal p = 0.066) and the BRCA1/2 subgroup (HR 0.663, 95% CI 0.464-0.947; nominal p = 0.024). Niraparib + AAP led to a statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvement in time to symptomatic progression in both the HRR<sup>+</sup> population (HR 0.547, 95% CI 0.396-0.754; p = 0.006) and the BRCA1/2 subgroup (HR 0.562, 95% CI 0.371-0.849; nominal p = 0.006), and a clinically meaningful improvement in time to cytotoxic chemotherapy in the HRR<sup>+</sup> population (HR 0.688, 95% CI 0.499-0.950; p = 0.022) and the BRCA1/2 subgroup (HR 0.598, 95% CI 0.387-0.924; nominal p = 0.019) in comparison to placebo + AAP. The niraparib + AAP safety profile remains unchanged at longer follow-up; adverse events were primarily hematologic and manageable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>The MAGNITUDE final analysis showed that patients with HRR<sup>+</sup> mCRPC, including those with the approved indication of BRCA-altered mCRPC, generally continue to benefit from first-line treatment with niraparib + AAP in comparison to placebo + AAP.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Niraparib and Abiraterone Acetate plus Prednisone in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Final Overall Survival Analysis for the Phase 3 MAGNITUDE Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Kim N Chi, Elena Castro, Gert Attard, Matthew R Smith, Shahneen Sandhu, Eleni Efstathiou, Guilhem Roubaud, Eric J Small, Andrea Pereira de Santana Gomes, Dana E Rathkopf, Marniza Saad, Howard Gurney, Wonho Jung, Won Kim, Shiva Dibaj, Daphne Wu, Jenny Zhang, Angela Lopez-Gitlitz, Peter Francis, David Olmos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The phase 3 MAGNITUDE trial previously met its primary endpoint of an improvement in radiographic progression-free survival with niraparib + abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) versus placebo + AAP in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and alterations in genes involved in DNA homologous recombination repair (HRR<sup>+</sup>), particularly in BRCA1/2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were prospectively screened for HRR alterations and randomized 1:1 to niraparib + AAP (n = 212) or placebo + AAP (n = 211). We report results from the prespecified, event-driven, final analysis of secondary efficacy endpoints.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Final analysis at median follow-up of 37.3 mo revealed no difference in overall survival (OS) between niraparib + AAP and placebo + AAP in the HRR<sup>+</sup> population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.931, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.720-1.203; p = 0.585) or the subgroup with BRCA1/2 alterations (HR 0.788, 95% CI 0.554-1.120; nominal p = 0.183). Prespecified multivariate analyses adjusted for baseline prognostic factors showed a trend toward longer OS with niraparib + AAP over placebo + AAP in the HRR<sup>+</sup> population (HR 0.785, 95% CI 0.606-1.016; nominal p = 0.066) and the BRCA1/2 subgroup (HR 0.663, 95% CI 0.464-0.947; nominal p = 0.024). Niraparib + AAP led to a statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvement in time to symptomatic progression in both the HRR<sup>+</sup> population (HR 0.547, 95% CI 0.396-0.754; p = 0.006) and the BRCA1/2 subgroup (HR 0.562, 95% CI 0.371-0.849; nominal p = 0.006), and a clinically meaningful improvement in time to cytotoxic chemotherapy in the HRR<sup>+</sup> population (HR 0.688, 95% CI 0.499-0.950; p = 0.022) and the BRCA1/2 subgroup (HR 0.598, 95% CI 0.387-0.924; nominal p = 0.019) in comparison to placebo + AAP. The niraparib + AAP safety profile remains unchanged at longer follow-up; adverse events were primarily hematologic and manageable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>The MAGNITUDE final analysis showed that patients with HRR<sup>+</sup> mCRPC, including those with the approved indication of BRCA-altered mCRPC, generally continue to benefit from first-line treatment with niraparib + AAP in comparison to placebo + AAP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.012\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:3期量级试验之前达到了其主要终点,即在转移性阉切抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)和参与DNA同源重组修复(HRR+)的基因改变的患者中,尼拉帕尼+醋酸阿比特龙和泼尼松(AAP)与安慰剂+ AAP相比,放射学无进展生存率的改善,特别是在BRCA1/2中。方法:对患者进行HRR改变的前瞻性筛选,并以1:1的比例随机分配到尼拉帕尼+ AAP (n = 212)或安慰剂+ AAP (n = 211)。我们报告的结果来自预先指定的、事件驱动的、次要疗效终点的最终分析。主要发现和局限性:中位随访37.3个月的最终分析显示,在HRR+人群中,尼拉帕尼+ AAP与安慰剂+ AAP的总生存期(OS)无差异(风险比[HR] 0.931, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.720-1.203;p = 0.585)或BRCA1/2改变亚组(HR 0.788, 95% CI 0.554-1.120;名义p = 0.183)。调整基线预后因素的预先指定多变量分析显示,在HRR+人群中,尼拉帕尼+ AAP比安慰剂+ AAP有更长的生存期趋势(HR 0.785, 95% CI 0.606-1.016;名义p = 0.066)和BRCA1/2亚组(HR 0.663, 95% CI 0.464-0.947;名义p = 0.024)。在HRR+人群中,尼拉帕尼+ AAP在症状进展时间上具有统计学意义,具有临床意义的改善(HR 0.547, 95% CI 0.396-0.754;p = 0.006)和BRCA1/2亚组(HR 0.562, 95% CI 0.371-0.849;名义p = 0.006),在HRR+人群中,到细胞毒性化疗的时间有临床意义的改善(HR 0.688, 95% CI 0.499-0.950;p = 0.022)和BRCA1/2亚组(HR 0.598, 95% CI 0.387-0.924;名义p = 0.019),与安慰剂+ AAP相比。尼拉帕尼+ AAP的安全性在更长时间的随访中保持不变;不良事件主要是血液学和可控的。结论和临床意义:MAGNITUDE最终分析显示,HRR+ mCRPC患者,包括那些已批准brca改变mCRPC适应症的患者,与安慰剂+ AAP相比,一般继续从尼拉帕尼+ AAP一线治疗中获益。
Niraparib and Abiraterone Acetate plus Prednisone in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Final Overall Survival Analysis for the Phase 3 MAGNITUDE Trial.
Background and objective: The phase 3 MAGNITUDE trial previously met its primary endpoint of an improvement in radiographic progression-free survival with niraparib + abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) versus placebo + AAP in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and alterations in genes involved in DNA homologous recombination repair (HRR+), particularly in BRCA1/2.
Methods: Patients were prospectively screened for HRR alterations and randomized 1:1 to niraparib + AAP (n = 212) or placebo + AAP (n = 211). We report results from the prespecified, event-driven, final analysis of secondary efficacy endpoints.
Key findings and limitations: Final analysis at median follow-up of 37.3 mo revealed no difference in overall survival (OS) between niraparib + AAP and placebo + AAP in the HRR+ population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.931, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.720-1.203; p = 0.585) or the subgroup with BRCA1/2 alterations (HR 0.788, 95% CI 0.554-1.120; nominal p = 0.183). Prespecified multivariate analyses adjusted for baseline prognostic factors showed a trend toward longer OS with niraparib + AAP over placebo + AAP in the HRR+ population (HR 0.785, 95% CI 0.606-1.016; nominal p = 0.066) and the BRCA1/2 subgroup (HR 0.663, 95% CI 0.464-0.947; nominal p = 0.024). Niraparib + AAP led to a statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvement in time to symptomatic progression in both the HRR+ population (HR 0.547, 95% CI 0.396-0.754; p = 0.006) and the BRCA1/2 subgroup (HR 0.562, 95% CI 0.371-0.849; nominal p = 0.006), and a clinically meaningful improvement in time to cytotoxic chemotherapy in the HRR+ population (HR 0.688, 95% CI 0.499-0.950; p = 0.022) and the BRCA1/2 subgroup (HR 0.598, 95% CI 0.387-0.924; nominal p = 0.019) in comparison to placebo + AAP. The niraparib + AAP safety profile remains unchanged at longer follow-up; adverse events were primarily hematologic and manageable.
Conclusions and clinical implications: The MAGNITUDE final analysis showed that patients with HRR+ mCRPC, including those with the approved indication of BRCA-altered mCRPC, generally continue to benefit from first-line treatment with niraparib + AAP in comparison to placebo + AAP.
期刊介绍:
Journal Name: European Urology Oncology
Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology
Focus:
First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies
Aims to deliver high-quality research
Content:
Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews
Covers clinical, basic, and translational research
Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format