{"title":"超分辨率深度学习重建评价磁共振脊髓造影腰椎管狭窄状态。","authors":"Koichiro Yasaka, Yusuke Asari, Yuichi Morita, Mariko Kurokawa, Taku Tajima, Hiroyuki Akai, Naoki Yoshioka, Masaaki Akahane, Kuni Ohtomo, Osamu Abe, Shigeru Kiryu","doi":"10.1007/s11604-025-01787-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate whether super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) of MR myelography-aided evaluations of lumbar spinal stenosis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, lumbar MR myelography of 40 patients (16 males and 24 females; mean age, 59.4 ± 31.8 years) were analyzed. Using the MR imaging data, MR myelography was separately reconstructed via SR-DLR, deep learning reconstruction (DLR), and conventional zero-filling interpolation (ZIP). Three radiologists, blinded to patient background data and MR reconstruction information, independently evaluated the image sets in terms of the following items: the numbers of levels affected by lumbar spinal stenosis; and cauda equina depiction, sharpness, noise, artifacts, and overall image quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median interobserver agreement in terms of the numbers of lumbar spinal stenosis levels were 0.819, 0.735, and 0.729 for SR-DLR, DLR, and ZIP images, respectively. The imaging quality of the cauda equina, and image sharpness, noise, and overall quality on SR-DLR images were significantly better than those on DLR and ZIP images, as rated by all readers (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). No significant differences were observed for artifacts on SR-DLR against DLR and ZIP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SR-DLR improved the image quality of lumbar MR myelographs compared to DLR and ZIP, and was associated with better interobserver agreement during assessment of lumbar spinal stenosis status.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1427-1433"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Super-resolution deep learning reconstruction to evaluate lumbar spinal stenosis status on magnetic resonance myelography.\",\"authors\":\"Koichiro Yasaka, Yusuke Asari, Yuichi Morita, Mariko Kurokawa, Taku Tajima, Hiroyuki Akai, Naoki Yoshioka, Masaaki Akahane, Kuni Ohtomo, Osamu Abe, Shigeru Kiryu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11604-025-01787-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate whether super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) of MR myelography-aided evaluations of lumbar spinal stenosis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, lumbar MR myelography of 40 patients (16 males and 24 females; mean age, 59.4 ± 31.8 years) were analyzed. Using the MR imaging data, MR myelography was separately reconstructed via SR-DLR, deep learning reconstruction (DLR), and conventional zero-filling interpolation (ZIP). Three radiologists, blinded to patient background data and MR reconstruction information, independently evaluated the image sets in terms of the following items: the numbers of levels affected by lumbar spinal stenosis; and cauda equina depiction, sharpness, noise, artifacts, and overall image quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median interobserver agreement in terms of the numbers of lumbar spinal stenosis levels were 0.819, 0.735, and 0.729 for SR-DLR, DLR, and ZIP images, respectively. The imaging quality of the cauda equina, and image sharpness, noise, and overall quality on SR-DLR images were significantly better than those on DLR and ZIP images, as rated by all readers (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). No significant differences were observed for artifacts on SR-DLR against DLR and ZIP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SR-DLR improved the image quality of lumbar MR myelographs compared to DLR and ZIP, and was associated with better interobserver agreement during assessment of lumbar spinal stenosis status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1427-1433\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396975/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01787-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01787-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Super-resolution deep learning reconstruction to evaluate lumbar spinal stenosis status on magnetic resonance myelography.
Purpose: To investigate whether super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) of MR myelography-aided evaluations of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Material and methods: In this retrospective study, lumbar MR myelography of 40 patients (16 males and 24 females; mean age, 59.4 ± 31.8 years) were analyzed. Using the MR imaging data, MR myelography was separately reconstructed via SR-DLR, deep learning reconstruction (DLR), and conventional zero-filling interpolation (ZIP). Three radiologists, blinded to patient background data and MR reconstruction information, independently evaluated the image sets in terms of the following items: the numbers of levels affected by lumbar spinal stenosis; and cauda equina depiction, sharpness, noise, artifacts, and overall image quality.
Results: The median interobserver agreement in terms of the numbers of lumbar spinal stenosis levels were 0.819, 0.735, and 0.729 for SR-DLR, DLR, and ZIP images, respectively. The imaging quality of the cauda equina, and image sharpness, noise, and overall quality on SR-DLR images were significantly better than those on DLR and ZIP images, as rated by all readers (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). No significant differences were observed for artifacts on SR-DLR against DLR and ZIP.
Conclusions: SR-DLR improved the image quality of lumbar MR myelographs compared to DLR and ZIP, and was associated with better interobserver agreement during assessment of lumbar spinal stenosis status.
期刊介绍:
Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.