中欧和东欧国家多发性硬化症患者获得药物、护理和服务的比较分析

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yoana Seitaridou, Dominik Grega, Sorin Paveliu, Agnes Männik, Przemysław Holko, Ivana Tadić, Ivana Stevic, Teodora Chamova, Guenka Petrova, Maria Kamusheva
{"title":"中欧和东欧国家多发性硬化症患者获得药物、护理和服务的比较分析","authors":"Yoana Seitaridou, Dominik Grega, Sorin Paveliu, Agnes Männik, Przemysław Holko, Ivana Tadić, Ivana Stevic, Teodora Chamova, Guenka Petrova, Maria Kamusheva","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2493131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study compared access to disease-modifying treatments (DMTs), care, and services for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients across six Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A 2-part questionnaire-based survey was conducted among experts from Bulgaria, Estonia, Poland, Romania, Serbia, and Slovakia over 4 months (1 December 2022 - 1 April 2023).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study reveals notable variations in the legal requirements for pricing and reimbursement of MS medications, as well as criteria for health technology assessment (HTA) across countries. Despite these differences, DMTs were fully reimbursed in all countries. Poland exhibited the highest MS expenditures in 2021, totaling 171 million euros. Administrative procedures for prescribing and dispensing MS drugs were similar across countries, but the range of services and support offered to MS patients varied. Assessment of treatment accessibility, based on the number of authorized DMTs listed in Positive Drug Lists (PDLs), shows Bulgaria leading with 84.21% access, followed closely by Poland and Slovakia with comparable rates of 78.95%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study revealed disparities in health care and services for MS patients across the countries surveyed. Addressing these disparities and the need for targeted interventions to ensure equitable access is critical. Further research is needed to find effective solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to medicines, care, and services for multiple sclerosis patients in Central and Eastern European countries: a comparative analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yoana Seitaridou, Dominik Grega, Sorin Paveliu, Agnes Männik, Przemysław Holko, Ivana Tadić, Ivana Stevic, Teodora Chamova, Guenka Petrova, Maria Kamusheva\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737167.2025.2493131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study compared access to disease-modifying treatments (DMTs), care, and services for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients across six Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A 2-part questionnaire-based survey was conducted among experts from Bulgaria, Estonia, Poland, Romania, Serbia, and Slovakia over 4 months (1 December 2022 - 1 April 2023).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study reveals notable variations in the legal requirements for pricing and reimbursement of MS medications, as well as criteria for health technology assessment (HTA) across countries. Despite these differences, DMTs were fully reimbursed in all countries. Poland exhibited the highest MS expenditures in 2021, totaling 171 million euros. Administrative procedures for prescribing and dispensing MS drugs were similar across countries, but the range of services and support offered to MS patients varied. Assessment of treatment accessibility, based on the number of authorized DMTs listed in Positive Drug Lists (PDLs), shows Bulgaria leading with 84.21% access, followed closely by Poland and Slovakia with comparable rates of 78.95%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study revealed disparities in health care and services for MS patients across the countries surveyed. Addressing these disparities and the need for targeted interventions to ensure equitable access is critical. Further research is needed to find effective solutions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2493131\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2493131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:该研究比较了六个中东欧国家(CEECs)多发性硬化症(MS)患者的疾病改善治疗(dmt)、护理和服务的可及性。研究设计和方法:对来自保加利亚、爱沙尼亚、波兰、罗马尼亚、塞尔维亚和斯洛伐克的专家进行了为期4个月(2022年12月1日至2023年4月1日)的两部分问卷调查。结果:该研究揭示了各国对多发性硬化症药物定价和报销的法律要求以及卫生技术评估(HTA)标准的显著差异。尽管存在这些差异,但在所有国家,dmt都得到了全额报销。波兰在2021年的MS支出最高,总计1.71亿欧元。不同国家的多发性硬化症药物的处方和分发管理程序是相似的,但是为多发性硬化症患者提供的服务和支持的范围各不相同。根据阳性药物清单(pdl)中所列授权dmt的数量对治疗可及性进行评估,结果显示保加利亚以84.21%的可及性领先,紧随其后的是波兰和斯洛伐克,可及性为78.95%。结论:该研究揭示了在接受调查的国家中,多发性硬化症患者的医疗保健和服务存在差异。解决这些差异和采取有针对性的干预措施以确保公平获取至关重要。需要进一步研究以找到有效的解决办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Access to medicines, care, and services for multiple sclerosis patients in Central and Eastern European countries: a comparative analysis.

Background: The study compared access to disease-modifying treatments (DMTs), care, and services for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients across six Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs).

Research design and methods: A 2-part questionnaire-based survey was conducted among experts from Bulgaria, Estonia, Poland, Romania, Serbia, and Slovakia over 4 months (1 December 2022 - 1 April 2023).

Results: The study reveals notable variations in the legal requirements for pricing and reimbursement of MS medications, as well as criteria for health technology assessment (HTA) across countries. Despite these differences, DMTs were fully reimbursed in all countries. Poland exhibited the highest MS expenditures in 2021, totaling 171 million euros. Administrative procedures for prescribing and dispensing MS drugs were similar across countries, but the range of services and support offered to MS patients varied. Assessment of treatment accessibility, based on the number of authorized DMTs listed in Positive Drug Lists (PDLs), shows Bulgaria leading with 84.21% access, followed closely by Poland and Slovakia with comparable rates of 78.95%.

Conclusions: The study revealed disparities in health care and services for MS patients across the countries surveyed. Addressing these disparities and the need for targeted interventions to ensure equitable access is critical. Further research is needed to find effective solutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信