Yoana Seitaridou, Dominik Grega, Sorin Paveliu, Agnes Männik, Przemysław Holko, Ivana Tadić, Ivana Stevic, Teodora Chamova, Guenka Petrova, Maria Kamusheva
{"title":"中欧和东欧国家多发性硬化症患者获得药物、护理和服务的比较分析","authors":"Yoana Seitaridou, Dominik Grega, Sorin Paveliu, Agnes Männik, Przemysław Holko, Ivana Tadić, Ivana Stevic, Teodora Chamova, Guenka Petrova, Maria Kamusheva","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2493131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study compared access to disease-modifying treatments (DMTs), care, and services for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients across six Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A 2-part questionnaire-based survey was conducted among experts from Bulgaria, Estonia, Poland, Romania, Serbia, and Slovakia over 4 months (1 December 2022 - 1 April 2023).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study reveals notable variations in the legal requirements for pricing and reimbursement of MS medications, as well as criteria for health technology assessment (HTA) across countries. Despite these differences, DMTs were fully reimbursed in all countries. Poland exhibited the highest MS expenditures in 2021, totaling 171 million euros. Administrative procedures for prescribing and dispensing MS drugs were similar across countries, but the range of services and support offered to MS patients varied. Assessment of treatment accessibility, based on the number of authorized DMTs listed in Positive Drug Lists (PDLs), shows Bulgaria leading with 84.21% access, followed closely by Poland and Slovakia with comparable rates of 78.95%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study revealed disparities in health care and services for MS patients across the countries surveyed. Addressing these disparities and the need for targeted interventions to ensure equitable access is critical. Further research is needed to find effective solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to medicines, care, and services for multiple sclerosis patients in Central and Eastern European countries: a comparative analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yoana Seitaridou, Dominik Grega, Sorin Paveliu, Agnes Männik, Przemysław Holko, Ivana Tadić, Ivana Stevic, Teodora Chamova, Guenka Petrova, Maria Kamusheva\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737167.2025.2493131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study compared access to disease-modifying treatments (DMTs), care, and services for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients across six Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A 2-part questionnaire-based survey was conducted among experts from Bulgaria, Estonia, Poland, Romania, Serbia, and Slovakia over 4 months (1 December 2022 - 1 April 2023).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study reveals notable variations in the legal requirements for pricing and reimbursement of MS medications, as well as criteria for health technology assessment (HTA) across countries. Despite these differences, DMTs were fully reimbursed in all countries. Poland exhibited the highest MS expenditures in 2021, totaling 171 million euros. Administrative procedures for prescribing and dispensing MS drugs were similar across countries, but the range of services and support offered to MS patients varied. Assessment of treatment accessibility, based on the number of authorized DMTs listed in Positive Drug Lists (PDLs), shows Bulgaria leading with 84.21% access, followed closely by Poland and Slovakia with comparable rates of 78.95%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study revealed disparities in health care and services for MS patients across the countries surveyed. Addressing these disparities and the need for targeted interventions to ensure equitable access is critical. Further research is needed to find effective solutions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2493131\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2493131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Access to medicines, care, and services for multiple sclerosis patients in Central and Eastern European countries: a comparative analysis.
Background: The study compared access to disease-modifying treatments (DMTs), care, and services for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients across six Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs).
Research design and methods: A 2-part questionnaire-based survey was conducted among experts from Bulgaria, Estonia, Poland, Romania, Serbia, and Slovakia over 4 months (1 December 2022 - 1 April 2023).
Results: The study reveals notable variations in the legal requirements for pricing and reimbursement of MS medications, as well as criteria for health technology assessment (HTA) across countries. Despite these differences, DMTs were fully reimbursed in all countries. Poland exhibited the highest MS expenditures in 2021, totaling 171 million euros. Administrative procedures for prescribing and dispensing MS drugs were similar across countries, but the range of services and support offered to MS patients varied. Assessment of treatment accessibility, based on the number of authorized DMTs listed in Positive Drug Lists (PDLs), shows Bulgaria leading with 84.21% access, followed closely by Poland and Slovakia with comparable rates of 78.95%.
Conclusions: The study revealed disparities in health care and services for MS patients across the countries surveyed. Addressing these disparities and the need for targeted interventions to ensure equitable access is critical. Further research is needed to find effective solutions.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review.
The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.