在急诊科和其他执业医师中使用丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的障碍和促进因素

IF 3.1 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
AIMS Public Health Pub Date : 2025-01-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3934/publichealth.2025005
James A Swartz, Dana Franceschini, Nora M Marino, Adrienne H Call, Lisa Rosenberger, Sarah Whitehouse
{"title":"在急诊科和其他执业医师中使用丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的障碍和促进因素","authors":"James A Swartz, Dana Franceschini, Nora M Marino, Adrienne H Call, Lisa Rosenberger, Sarah Whitehouse","doi":"10.3934/publichealth.2025005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite federal legislation intended to increase the prescribing of buprenorphine as medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), such as the Drug Addiction Treatment Act (DATA) of 2000, most providers have continued to prescribe to some patients or to not prescribe at all. We aimed to determine the continuing barriers and supports needed for expanding buprenorphine prescribing and compared barriers experienced by emergency department (ED) physicians with those in other practice settings, given the unique aspects of the ED practice setting. We obtained survey data from August through November 2021 from 412 X-waivered Illinois physicians licensed to prescribe buprenorphine as MOUD, 95 (23.1%) of whom worked primarily in a hospital-based ED. Survey questions included: 1) Professional background, practice characteristics, and prescribing practices; 2) barriers to prescribing buprenorphine; 3) barriers to expanding prescribing; and 4) training/additional supports needed to facilitate buprenorphine prescribing. We used bivariate crosstabulations and multivariable OLS and binary logistic regressions to compare the responses of physicians practicing in the ED versus other practice settings and to compare physicians who prescribed buprenorphine in the past year with those who had not. There were few statistically significant differences among the examined subgroups indicating general agreement regardless of practice setting and prescribing status. The most frequently perceived barrier was having an inadequate community-based behavioral health treatment system to which OUD patients could be referred. Insurance reimbursement, difficulties building practice- and community-based systems to support buprenorphine prescribing, and challenges knowing where and how to refer patients for follow-up and ongoing support services were also prominent concerns. Based on study findings, efforts to expand buprenorphine for OUD might focus on providing support to make and manage treatment referrals and expanding the availability of community-based behavioral healthcare services. Building networks of care could potentially have a greater impact on MOUD availability than increasing the number of practitioners trained to prescribe buprenorphine.</p>","PeriodicalId":45684,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Public Health","volume":"12 1","pages":"56-76"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11999815/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators to prescribing buprenorphine for treating opioid use disorder among emergency department and other practice setting physicians.\",\"authors\":\"James A Swartz, Dana Franceschini, Nora M Marino, Adrienne H Call, Lisa Rosenberger, Sarah Whitehouse\",\"doi\":\"10.3934/publichealth.2025005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite federal legislation intended to increase the prescribing of buprenorphine as medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), such as the Drug Addiction Treatment Act (DATA) of 2000, most providers have continued to prescribe to some patients or to not prescribe at all. We aimed to determine the continuing barriers and supports needed for expanding buprenorphine prescribing and compared barriers experienced by emergency department (ED) physicians with those in other practice settings, given the unique aspects of the ED practice setting. We obtained survey data from August through November 2021 from 412 X-waivered Illinois physicians licensed to prescribe buprenorphine as MOUD, 95 (23.1%) of whom worked primarily in a hospital-based ED. Survey questions included: 1) Professional background, practice characteristics, and prescribing practices; 2) barriers to prescribing buprenorphine; 3) barriers to expanding prescribing; and 4) training/additional supports needed to facilitate buprenorphine prescribing. We used bivariate crosstabulations and multivariable OLS and binary logistic regressions to compare the responses of physicians practicing in the ED versus other practice settings and to compare physicians who prescribed buprenorphine in the past year with those who had not. There were few statistically significant differences among the examined subgroups indicating general agreement regardless of practice setting and prescribing status. The most frequently perceived barrier was having an inadequate community-based behavioral health treatment system to which OUD patients could be referred. Insurance reimbursement, difficulties building practice- and community-based systems to support buprenorphine prescribing, and challenges knowing where and how to refer patients for follow-up and ongoing support services were also prominent concerns. Based on study findings, efforts to expand buprenorphine for OUD might focus on providing support to make and manage treatment referrals and expanding the availability of community-based behavioral healthcare services. Building networks of care could potentially have a greater impact on MOUD availability than increasing the number of practitioners trained to prescribe buprenorphine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIMS Public Health\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"56-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11999815/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIMS Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2025005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2025005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管联邦立法打算增加丁丙诺啡作为阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)药物的处方,如2000年的《药物成瘾治疗法案》(DATA),但大多数提供者继续给一些病人开处方,或者根本不开处方。我们的目的是确定扩大丁丙诺啡处方所需的持续障碍和支持,并比较急诊科(ED)医生与其他实践环境中遇到的障碍,考虑到ED实践环境的独特方面。我们从2021年8月至11月获得了412名获得许可将丁丙诺啡作为mod的x -豁免伊利诺伊州医生的调查数据,其中95名(23.1%)主要在医院的急诊室工作。调查问题包括:1)专业背景、执业特征和处方实践;2)丁丙诺啡处方障碍;3)扩大处方的障碍;4)促进丁丙诺啡处方所需的培训/额外支持。我们使用双变量交叉稳定、多变量OLS和二元逻辑回归来比较急诊科执业医师与其他执业医师的反应,并比较在过去一年中开丁丙诺啡的医师与没有开丁丙诺啡的医师。在检查的亚组中,几乎没有统计学上的显著差异,表明无论实践环境和处方状态如何,总体上是一致的。最常见的障碍是缺乏以社区为基础的行为健康治疗系统,OUD患者无法转诊。保险报销、建立以实践和社区为基础的系统以支持丁丙诺啡处方的困难,以及知道在何处以及如何转诊患者接受随访和持续支持服务的挑战,也是突出的问题。根据研究结果,扩大丁丙诺啡用于OUD的努力可能侧重于提供支持,以制定和管理治疗转诊,并扩大社区行为保健服务的可用性。建立护理网络可能比增加培训开丁丙诺啡的从业人员数量对mod的可用性产生更大的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and facilitators to prescribing buprenorphine for treating opioid use disorder among emergency department and other practice setting physicians.

Despite federal legislation intended to increase the prescribing of buprenorphine as medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), such as the Drug Addiction Treatment Act (DATA) of 2000, most providers have continued to prescribe to some patients or to not prescribe at all. We aimed to determine the continuing barriers and supports needed for expanding buprenorphine prescribing and compared barriers experienced by emergency department (ED) physicians with those in other practice settings, given the unique aspects of the ED practice setting. We obtained survey data from August through November 2021 from 412 X-waivered Illinois physicians licensed to prescribe buprenorphine as MOUD, 95 (23.1%) of whom worked primarily in a hospital-based ED. Survey questions included: 1) Professional background, practice characteristics, and prescribing practices; 2) barriers to prescribing buprenorphine; 3) barriers to expanding prescribing; and 4) training/additional supports needed to facilitate buprenorphine prescribing. We used bivariate crosstabulations and multivariable OLS and binary logistic regressions to compare the responses of physicians practicing in the ED versus other practice settings and to compare physicians who prescribed buprenorphine in the past year with those who had not. There were few statistically significant differences among the examined subgroups indicating general agreement regardless of practice setting and prescribing status. The most frequently perceived barrier was having an inadequate community-based behavioral health treatment system to which OUD patients could be referred. Insurance reimbursement, difficulties building practice- and community-based systems to support buprenorphine prescribing, and challenges knowing where and how to refer patients for follow-up and ongoing support services were also prominent concerns. Based on study findings, efforts to expand buprenorphine for OUD might focus on providing support to make and manage treatment referrals and expanding the availability of community-based behavioral healthcare services. Building networks of care could potentially have a greater impact on MOUD availability than increasing the number of practitioners trained to prescribe buprenorphine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AIMS Public Health
AIMS Public Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信