{"title":"隔离器内封闭系统传递装置注射器接头连接对静脉给药过程中细胞毒残留污染的影响评价。","authors":"Louisa Knowles","doi":"10.1177/10781552251334027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThe European Biosafety Network recommends that cytotoxic drug surface contamination in pharmacies and patient wards not exceed 0.1 ng/cm<sup>2</sup>. Among other mitigations, closed system transfer devices (CSTDs) are recommended in the US, Europe, and UK for the reduction of surface contamination. Although in the UK CSTDs are not part of standard cytotoxic preparation procedures in isolators, CSTD syringe adaptors are recommended for use with syringes for intravenous administration. We investigated whether the addition of a CSTD syringe adaptor in the isolator reduces cytotoxic residue contamination during intravenous bolus administration.MethodsTwenty-five cyclophosphamide syringes were prepared with hub caps and twenty-five with SIMPLIVIA<sup>®</sup> (formerly Tevadaptor/OnGuard<sup>®</sup>) Syringe Adaptor Locks (SALs) in an isolator. Surface contamination of syringes, gauze pads placed at the administration site, and nurses' gloves was compared between the practice of connecting hub caps in the isolator and removing them in the ward versus connecting SALs in the isolator during preparation. Cyclophosphamide contamination was quantified by liquid-chromatography mass spectrometry.ResultsUse of SALs compared to standard hub caps led to statistically significant reduction in cyclophosphamide contamination on the syringes (2.41 ± 0.89 ng versus 33.42 ± 8.48 ng, p = 0.0007), the swabs used for connect/disconnect (0.01372 ± 0.01 ng versus 655.80 ± 190.18 ng, p = 0.001), and nurses' gloves (0.0009 ± 0.0009 ng versus 8.31 ± 3.94 ng, p = 0.04). When hub caps were used, 48% of syringes, 76% of gauze pads, and 8% of gloves exceeded the recommended limit of 0.1 ng/cm<sup>2</sup>, while no samples exceeded this limit with SAL.ConclusionsThe implementation of CSTD syringe adaptors was beneficial for reducing cytotoxic drug exposure to nurses administering intravenous syringes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"10781552251334027"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the effect of closed system transfer device syringe adaptor connection in the isolator on cytotoxic residue contamination during intravenous administration.\",\"authors\":\"Louisa Knowles\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10781552251334027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>IntroductionThe European Biosafety Network recommends that cytotoxic drug surface contamination in pharmacies and patient wards not exceed 0.1 ng/cm<sup>2</sup>. Among other mitigations, closed system transfer devices (CSTDs) are recommended in the US, Europe, and UK for the reduction of surface contamination. Although in the UK CSTDs are not part of standard cytotoxic preparation procedures in isolators, CSTD syringe adaptors are recommended for use with syringes for intravenous administration. We investigated whether the addition of a CSTD syringe adaptor in the isolator reduces cytotoxic residue contamination during intravenous bolus administration.MethodsTwenty-five cyclophosphamide syringes were prepared with hub caps and twenty-five with SIMPLIVIA<sup>®</sup> (formerly Tevadaptor/OnGuard<sup>®</sup>) Syringe Adaptor Locks (SALs) in an isolator. Surface contamination of syringes, gauze pads placed at the administration site, and nurses' gloves was compared between the practice of connecting hub caps in the isolator and removing them in the ward versus connecting SALs in the isolator during preparation. Cyclophosphamide contamination was quantified by liquid-chromatography mass spectrometry.ResultsUse of SALs compared to standard hub caps led to statistically significant reduction in cyclophosphamide contamination on the syringes (2.41 ± 0.89 ng versus 33.42 ± 8.48 ng, p = 0.0007), the swabs used for connect/disconnect (0.01372 ± 0.01 ng versus 655.80 ± 190.18 ng, p = 0.001), and nurses' gloves (0.0009 ± 0.0009 ng versus 8.31 ± 3.94 ng, p = 0.04). When hub caps were used, 48% of syringes, 76% of gauze pads, and 8% of gloves exceeded the recommended limit of 0.1 ng/cm<sup>2</sup>, while no samples exceeded this limit with SAL.ConclusionsThe implementation of CSTD syringe adaptors was beneficial for reducing cytotoxic drug exposure to nurses administering intravenous syringes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10781552251334027\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552251334027\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552251334027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
欧洲生物安全网络建议药房和病房的细胞毒性药物表面污染不超过0.1 ng/cm2。在其他缓解措施中,美国、欧洲和英国推荐使用封闭系统传输装置(CSTDs)来减少表面污染。尽管在英国,CSTD不是隔离器中标准细胞毒制备程序的一部分,但建议将CSTD注射器适配器与静脉注射用注射器一起使用。我们研究了在隔离器中添加CSTD注射器适配器是否可以减少静脉给药过程中的细胞毒性残留污染。方法25支环磷酰胺注射器采用轮毂盖,25支采用SIMPLIVIA®(原Tevadaptor/OnGuard®)注射器适配器锁(SALs)在隔离器中制备。比较了在隔离器内连接轮毂帽并在病房内取下的做法与在隔离器内连接SALs的做法之间的注射器、放置在给药场所的纱布垫和护士手套的表面污染情况。采用液相色谱-质谱法测定环磷酰胺污染。结果与标准轮毂帽相比,使用SALs可显著降低注射器上的环磷酰胺污染(2.41±0.89 ng比33.42±8.48 ng, p = 0.0007)、用于连接/分离的棉签(0.01372±0.01 ng比655.80±190.18 ng, p = 0.001)和护士手套(0.0009±0.0009 ng比8.31±3.94 ng, p = 0.04)。当使用轮毂盖时,48%的注射器、76%的纱布垫和8%的手套超过了0.1 ng/cm2的建议限值,而SAL没有样品超过该限值。结论CSTD注射器接头的使用有利于减少静脉注射护士的细胞毒性药物暴露。
Evaluation of the effect of closed system transfer device syringe adaptor connection in the isolator on cytotoxic residue contamination during intravenous administration.
IntroductionThe European Biosafety Network recommends that cytotoxic drug surface contamination in pharmacies and patient wards not exceed 0.1 ng/cm2. Among other mitigations, closed system transfer devices (CSTDs) are recommended in the US, Europe, and UK for the reduction of surface contamination. Although in the UK CSTDs are not part of standard cytotoxic preparation procedures in isolators, CSTD syringe adaptors are recommended for use with syringes for intravenous administration. We investigated whether the addition of a CSTD syringe adaptor in the isolator reduces cytotoxic residue contamination during intravenous bolus administration.MethodsTwenty-five cyclophosphamide syringes were prepared with hub caps and twenty-five with SIMPLIVIA® (formerly Tevadaptor/OnGuard®) Syringe Adaptor Locks (SALs) in an isolator. Surface contamination of syringes, gauze pads placed at the administration site, and nurses' gloves was compared between the practice of connecting hub caps in the isolator and removing them in the ward versus connecting SALs in the isolator during preparation. Cyclophosphamide contamination was quantified by liquid-chromatography mass spectrometry.ResultsUse of SALs compared to standard hub caps led to statistically significant reduction in cyclophosphamide contamination on the syringes (2.41 ± 0.89 ng versus 33.42 ± 8.48 ng, p = 0.0007), the swabs used for connect/disconnect (0.01372 ± 0.01 ng versus 655.80 ± 190.18 ng, p = 0.001), and nurses' gloves (0.0009 ± 0.0009 ng versus 8.31 ± 3.94 ng, p = 0.04). When hub caps were used, 48% of syringes, 76% of gauze pads, and 8% of gloves exceeded the recommended limit of 0.1 ng/cm2, while no samples exceeded this limit with SAL.ConclusionsThe implementation of CSTD syringe adaptors was beneficial for reducing cytotoxic drug exposure to nurses administering intravenous syringes.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...