椎间盘内臭氧与臭氧+ PRP治疗椎间盘退变的回顾性临床与影像学比较。

IF 0.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Gülseli Berivan Sezen, Osman Boyalı, Burak Karip, Selman Aktaş, Eyüp Can Savrunlu, Mourat Chasan, Necati Kaplan, Erdinç Civelek, Serdar Kabataş
{"title":"椎间盘内臭氧与臭氧+ PRP治疗椎间盘退变的回顾性临床与影像学比较。","authors":"Gülseli Berivan Sezen, Osman Boyalı, Burak Karip, Selman Aktaş, Eyüp Can Savrunlu, Mourat Chasan, Necati Kaplan, Erdinç Civelek, Serdar Kabataş","doi":"10.4274/TJAR.2025.241831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of intradiscal ozone therapy (OT) against a combination therapy of ozone and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in patients diagnosed with intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included a cohort of 50 patients, divided equally into two groups of 25, who received either intradiscal OT or ozone + PRP combination therapy between February 2022 and February 2023. The sample comprised 20 females and 30 males, with ages ranging from 19 to 76 years (mean age 48.8). Pain intensity was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), while disability levels were assessed using the oswestry disability index (ODI) prior to treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment. Additionally, lumbar magnetic resonance imaging was conducted at the 3-month mark post-treatment, with evaluations based on the Pfirrmann disc degeneration classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant improvement in both VAS and ODI scores was observed in both treatment groups (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The ozone + PRP combination therapy group exhibited no statistically significant difference in VAS and ODI scores compared to the ozone-only group (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intradiscal OT and the ozone + PRP combination therapy represent effective minimally invasive treatment options for patients suffering from IVDD, yielding substantial clinical benefits with minimal side effects. That is why it is suggested as a potential preferred therapeutic approach prior to the consideration of surgical interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23353,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective Clinical and Radiological Comparison of Intradiscal Ozone and Ozone + PRP Therapy Results in Patients with Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.\",\"authors\":\"Gülseli Berivan Sezen, Osman Boyalı, Burak Karip, Selman Aktaş, Eyüp Can Savrunlu, Mourat Chasan, Necati Kaplan, Erdinç Civelek, Serdar Kabataş\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/TJAR.2025.241831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of intradiscal ozone therapy (OT) against a combination therapy of ozone and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in patients diagnosed with intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included a cohort of 50 patients, divided equally into two groups of 25, who received either intradiscal OT or ozone + PRP combination therapy between February 2022 and February 2023. The sample comprised 20 females and 30 males, with ages ranging from 19 to 76 years (mean age 48.8). Pain intensity was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), while disability levels were assessed using the oswestry disability index (ODI) prior to treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment. Additionally, lumbar magnetic resonance imaging was conducted at the 3-month mark post-treatment, with evaluations based on the Pfirrmann disc degeneration classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant improvement in both VAS and ODI scores was observed in both treatment groups (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The ozone + PRP combination therapy group exhibited no statistically significant difference in VAS and ODI scores compared to the ozone-only group (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intradiscal OT and the ozone + PRP combination therapy represent effective minimally invasive treatment options for patients suffering from IVDD, yielding substantial clinical benefits with minimal side effects. That is why it is suggested as a potential preferred therapeutic approach prior to the consideration of surgical interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2025.241831\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2025.241831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本回顾性研究旨在评价和比较椎间盘内臭氧治疗(OT)与臭氧和富血小板血浆(PRP)联合治疗椎间盘退变(IVDD)患者的临床疗效。方法:该研究包括50例患者,平均分为两组,每组25例,于2022年2月至2023年2月期间接受椎间盘内OT或臭氧+ PRP联合治疗。样本包括20名女性和30名男性,年龄从19岁到76岁不等(平均年龄48.8岁)。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量疼痛强度,在治疗前和治疗后1、3和6个月使用oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评估残疾水平。此外,在治疗后3个月进行腰椎磁共振成像,根据Pfirrmann椎间盘退变分类进行评估。结果:两组患者VAS评分和ODI评分均有显著改善(P < 0.001)。臭氧+ PRP联合治疗组VAS、ODI评分与单用臭氧组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:椎间盘内OT和臭氧+ PRP联合治疗是IVDD患者有效的微创治疗选择,临床获益显著,副作用最小。这就是为什么在考虑手术干预之前,它被建议作为一种潜在的首选治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective Clinical and Radiological Comparison of Intradiscal Ozone and Ozone + PRP Therapy Results in Patients with Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.

Objective: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of intradiscal ozone therapy (OT) against a combination therapy of ozone and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in patients diagnosed with intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD).

Methods: The study included a cohort of 50 patients, divided equally into two groups of 25, who received either intradiscal OT or ozone + PRP combination therapy between February 2022 and February 2023. The sample comprised 20 females and 30 males, with ages ranging from 19 to 76 years (mean age 48.8). Pain intensity was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), while disability levels were assessed using the oswestry disability index (ODI) prior to treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment. Additionally, lumbar magnetic resonance imaging was conducted at the 3-month mark post-treatment, with evaluations based on the Pfirrmann disc degeneration classification.

Results: Significant improvement in both VAS and ODI scores was observed in both treatment groups (P < 0.001). The ozone + PRP combination therapy group exhibited no statistically significant difference in VAS and ODI scores compared to the ozone-only group (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Intradiscal OT and the ozone + PRP combination therapy represent effective minimally invasive treatment options for patients suffering from IVDD, yielding substantial clinical benefits with minimal side effects. That is why it is suggested as a potential preferred therapeutic approach prior to the consideration of surgical interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信