腹股沟疝全腹膜外修补术中平面夹层与套筒夹层的比较分析:倾向评分匹配。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Shang-Jun Zhou, Hai Huang, Ping Zhan, Rui-Bin Deng, Yan-Qing Deng, Pei-Jie Zhang, Huan-Bin Zhang, Hong-Shuai Li, You-Hua Wang, Jian-Hua Luo, Xue-Lu Zhou
{"title":"腹股沟疝全腹膜外修补术中平面夹层与套筒夹层的比较分析:倾向评分匹配。","authors":"Shang-Jun Zhou, Hai Huang, Ping Zhan, Rui-Bin Deng, Yan-Qing Deng, Pei-Jie Zhang, Huan-Bin Zhang, Hong-Shuai Li, You-Hua Wang, Jian-Hua Luo, Xue-Lu Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-11734-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair involves creating a preperitoneal space. The preperitoneal space can be created by telescopic dissection (TD) or plane dissection (PD). Nevertheless, these techniques may have some complications. This study aims to assess the impact and comprehensively compare the TD and PD methods in patients undergoing laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 156 patients who underwent PD at the Hospital from January 2017 to December 2023. Using propensity score matching (PSM), 312 TD patients were matched at a 1:2 ratio. The primary outcomes included peritoneal injury, vascular injury, clarity of the surgical field, operation time, and intraoperative blood loss. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, and recurrence rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, no significant differences in clinical characteristics were observed between the two groups. The PD group showed better the surgical field clarity, reduced intraoperative blood loss, and shorter operation time compared to the TD group. Additionally, the TD group had higher hospitalization costs. There were no statistically significant differences in hospital stay and follow-up duration between the two groups. There was a significant difference in the overall complication rate between the PD and TD groups, mainly in terms of peritoneal and vascular injuries. There was no statistical difference in severe complications (Clavien-Dindo classification) between the two groups. There was also no significant difference between the two groups in terms of incision infection, seroma, hematoma, chronic pain, and recurrence rate between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both plane dissection and telescopic dissection demonstrate efficacy and reliability in TEP surgery. The PD group showed superior performance in terms of clarity of the surgical field, reduction of peritoneal and vascular injuries, and could shorten hospital stays and reduce costs. Therefore, plane dissection has considerable potential for application in TEP surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"3710-3717"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12116701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of plane vs. telescopic dissection in totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: propensity score matching.\",\"authors\":\"Shang-Jun Zhou, Hai Huang, Ping Zhan, Rui-Bin Deng, Yan-Qing Deng, Pei-Jie Zhang, Huan-Bin Zhang, Hong-Shuai Li, You-Hua Wang, Jian-Hua Luo, Xue-Lu Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-025-11734-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair involves creating a preperitoneal space. The preperitoneal space can be created by telescopic dissection (TD) or plane dissection (PD). Nevertheless, these techniques may have some complications. This study aims to assess the impact and comprehensively compare the TD and PD methods in patients undergoing laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 156 patients who underwent PD at the Hospital from January 2017 to December 2023. Using propensity score matching (PSM), 312 TD patients were matched at a 1:2 ratio. The primary outcomes included peritoneal injury, vascular injury, clarity of the surgical field, operation time, and intraoperative blood loss. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, and recurrence rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, no significant differences in clinical characteristics were observed between the two groups. The PD group showed better the surgical field clarity, reduced intraoperative blood loss, and shorter operation time compared to the TD group. Additionally, the TD group had higher hospitalization costs. There were no statistically significant differences in hospital stay and follow-up duration between the two groups. There was a significant difference in the overall complication rate between the PD and TD groups, mainly in terms of peritoneal and vascular injuries. There was no statistical difference in severe complications (Clavien-Dindo classification) between the two groups. There was also no significant difference between the two groups in terms of incision infection, seroma, hematoma, chronic pain, and recurrence rate between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both plane dissection and telescopic dissection demonstrate efficacy and reliability in TEP surgery. The PD group showed superior performance in terms of clarity of the surgical field, reduction of peritoneal and vascular injuries, and could shorten hospital stays and reduce costs. Therefore, plane dissection has considerable potential for application in TEP surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3710-3717\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12116701/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11734-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11734-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:完全腹膜外(TEP)修复涉及创造腹膜前空间。腹膜前间隙可通过伸缩式剥离(TD)或平面剥离(PD)形成。然而,这些技术可能有一些并发症。本研究旨在评估TD和PD方法对腹腔镜下TEP腹股沟疝修补术的影响并进行综合比较。方法:回顾性分析2017年1月至2023年12月在该院接受PD治疗的156例患者。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM), 312例TD患者按1:2的比例匹配。主要结局包括腹膜损伤、血管损伤、手术视野清晰度、手术时间和术中出血量。次要结局包括住院时间、术后疼痛和复发率。结果:配对后,两组患者临床特征无明显差异。与TD组相比,PD组手术视野清晰,术中出血量减少,手术时间缩短。此外,TD组的住院费用更高。两组患者住院时间和随访时间差异无统计学意义。PD组和TD组的总并发症发生率有显著差异,主要表现在腹膜和血管损伤方面。两组严重并发症(Clavien-Dindo分类)比较,差异无统计学意义。两组在切口感染、血肿、血肿、慢性疼痛、复发率等方面差异无统计学意义。结论:平面夹层和套筒夹层在TEP手术中均具有良好的疗效和可靠性。PD组在手术视野清晰、减少腹膜及血管损伤、缩短住院时间、降低费用等方面表现优越。因此,平面解剖在TEP手术中具有相当大的应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of plane vs. telescopic dissection in totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: propensity score matching.

Objective: Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair involves creating a preperitoneal space. The preperitoneal space can be created by telescopic dissection (TD) or plane dissection (PD). Nevertheless, these techniques may have some complications. This study aims to assess the impact and comprehensively compare the TD and PD methods in patients undergoing laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 156 patients who underwent PD at the Hospital from January 2017 to December 2023. Using propensity score matching (PSM), 312 TD patients were matched at a 1:2 ratio. The primary outcomes included peritoneal injury, vascular injury, clarity of the surgical field, operation time, and intraoperative blood loss. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, and recurrence rate.

Results: After matching, no significant differences in clinical characteristics were observed between the two groups. The PD group showed better the surgical field clarity, reduced intraoperative blood loss, and shorter operation time compared to the TD group. Additionally, the TD group had higher hospitalization costs. There were no statistically significant differences in hospital stay and follow-up duration between the two groups. There was a significant difference in the overall complication rate between the PD and TD groups, mainly in terms of peritoneal and vascular injuries. There was no statistical difference in severe complications (Clavien-Dindo classification) between the two groups. There was also no significant difference between the two groups in terms of incision infection, seroma, hematoma, chronic pain, and recurrence rate between the groups.

Conclusion: Both plane dissection and telescopic dissection demonstrate efficacy and reliability in TEP surgery. The PD group showed superior performance in terms of clarity of the surgical field, reduction of peritoneal and vascular injuries, and could shorten hospital stays and reduce costs. Therefore, plane dissection has considerable potential for application in TEP surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信