专家对实施远程医疗患者报告结果的共识:来自国际德尔菲研究的结果。

IF 2.9 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Elizabeth J Unni, Liv Marit Valen Schougaard, Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi, Kedar K V Mate, Elizabeth J Austin, Klara Greffin, Natasha Roberts, Birgith Engelst Grove, Holger Muehlan
{"title":"专家对实施远程医疗患者报告结果的共识:来自国际德尔菲研究的结果。","authors":"Elizabeth J Unni, Liv Marit Valen Schougaard, Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi, Kedar K V Mate, Elizabeth J Austin, Klara Greffin, Natasha Roberts, Birgith Engelst Grove, Holger Muehlan","doi":"10.1186/s41687-025-00872-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Using Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in clinical care can reduce healthcare service utilization by improving the quality of care. Telehealth, defined by WHO, as the use of \"telecommunications and virtual technology to deliver healthcare outside of traditional healthcare facilities\", can facilitate a dynamic dialogue between patients and healthcare providers for timely interventions. With the increased use of telehealth facilitated by the infrastructure development during the COVID-19 pandemic, there is an opportunity to utilize telehealth for PRO implementation and a need for guidelines for using PROs via telehealth. This study aimed to generate expert consensus on the utilization of PROs in telehealth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Delphi methodology was used to achieve consensus among international experts with a predetermined consensus threshold of 70%. Experts were mainly identified through the ISOQOL Clinical Practice SIG. Surveys asked a combination of structured and open-ended questions about the conceptualization of PROs in telehealth, its applicability, target population, implementation challenges and successful strategies, evaluation approaches, and the essential stakeholders. Data from each round were iteratively analyzed using descriptive statistics (quantitative data) and content analysis (qualitative data).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 24 invitations sent, 17 completed the first round, and 11 completed all three rounds. Respondents were equally distributed between clinicians and researchers and 70% had used PROs via telehealth before the pandemic. Consensus was achieved and some of the relevant aspects are monitoring patients for applicability; individuals with chronic diseases as the target population; resources, staff buy-in, and clinical workflow as the implementation challenges and strategies; utilization metrics for evaluation; and clinicians and patients as essential stakeholders. Though consensus was not reached for the conceptualization of PROs using telehealth, the modified FDA definition of telehealth with the addition of its purpose, and the mode of administration was the most acceptable version. See attached table.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The expert consensus achieved provides important insights from an international perspective on how PROs are currently used via telehealth and the needed implementation support to advance their expansion in research and practice. Lack of consensus on the definition of PROs in telehealth signals the continued rapid evolution of their use and the need for additional research.</p>","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":"9 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11981999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expert consensus on implementing patient-reported outcomes in telehealth: findings from an international Delphi study.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth J Unni, Liv Marit Valen Schougaard, Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi, Kedar K V Mate, Elizabeth J Austin, Klara Greffin, Natasha Roberts, Birgith Engelst Grove, Holger Muehlan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41687-025-00872-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Using Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in clinical care can reduce healthcare service utilization by improving the quality of care. Telehealth, defined by WHO, as the use of \\\"telecommunications and virtual technology to deliver healthcare outside of traditional healthcare facilities\\\", can facilitate a dynamic dialogue between patients and healthcare providers for timely interventions. With the increased use of telehealth facilitated by the infrastructure development during the COVID-19 pandemic, there is an opportunity to utilize telehealth for PRO implementation and a need for guidelines for using PROs via telehealth. This study aimed to generate expert consensus on the utilization of PROs in telehealth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Delphi methodology was used to achieve consensus among international experts with a predetermined consensus threshold of 70%. Experts were mainly identified through the ISOQOL Clinical Practice SIG. Surveys asked a combination of structured and open-ended questions about the conceptualization of PROs in telehealth, its applicability, target population, implementation challenges and successful strategies, evaluation approaches, and the essential stakeholders. Data from each round were iteratively analyzed using descriptive statistics (quantitative data) and content analysis (qualitative data).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 24 invitations sent, 17 completed the first round, and 11 completed all three rounds. Respondents were equally distributed between clinicians and researchers and 70% had used PROs via telehealth before the pandemic. Consensus was achieved and some of the relevant aspects are monitoring patients for applicability; individuals with chronic diseases as the target population; resources, staff buy-in, and clinical workflow as the implementation challenges and strategies; utilization metrics for evaluation; and clinicians and patients as essential stakeholders. Though consensus was not reached for the conceptualization of PROs using telehealth, the modified FDA definition of telehealth with the addition of its purpose, and the mode of administration was the most acceptable version. See attached table.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The expert consensus achieved provides important insights from an international perspective on how PROs are currently used via telehealth and the needed implementation support to advance their expansion in research and practice. Lack of consensus on the definition of PROs in telehealth signals the continued rapid evolution of their use and the need for additional research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11981999/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00872-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00872-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在临床护理中使用患者报告结果(pro)可以通过提高护理质量来降低医疗保健服务的利用率。世卫组织将远程保健定义为利用“电信和虚拟技术在传统卫生保健设施之外提供卫生保健”,可促进患者和卫生保健提供者之间进行动态对话,以便及时采取干预措施。随着COVID-19大流行期间基础设施的发展促进了远程医疗的使用,有机会利用远程医疗实施PRO,并且需要制定通过远程医疗使用PRO的准则。本研究旨在就专业医师在远程医疗中的应用达成专家共识。方法:采用德尔菲法,在国际专家中达成共识,预设共识阈值为70%。专家主要通过ISOQOL临床实践SIG确定。调查询问了关于远程医疗专业人员概念化、适用性、目标人群、实施挑战和成功战略、评估方法以及主要利益相关者的结构化和开放式问题。采用描述性统计(定量数据)和内容分析(定性数据)对每轮数据进行迭代分析。结果:在发出的24份邀请中,17份完成了第一轮,11份完成了所有三轮。答复者平均分布在临床医生和研究人员之间,70%的人在大流行之前通过远程保健使用过专业人员。达成了共识,一些相关方面是监测患者的适用性;以慢性病患者为目标人群;资源、员工参与和临床工作流程作为实施挑战和策略;用于评价的利用指标;临床医生和患者是重要的利益相关者。虽然没有就专业医生使用远程医疗的概念达成共识,但FDA修改后的远程医疗定义(增加了其目的和管理模式)是最可接受的版本。见附表。结论:达成的专家共识从国际角度提供了重要见解,说明目前如何通过远程医疗使用辅助医生,以及在研究和实践中推进其扩展所需的实施支持。对远程保健专业人员的定义缺乏共识表明其使用仍在迅速演变,需要进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expert consensus on implementing patient-reported outcomes in telehealth: findings from an international Delphi study.

Background: Using Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in clinical care can reduce healthcare service utilization by improving the quality of care. Telehealth, defined by WHO, as the use of "telecommunications and virtual technology to deliver healthcare outside of traditional healthcare facilities", can facilitate a dynamic dialogue between patients and healthcare providers for timely interventions. With the increased use of telehealth facilitated by the infrastructure development during the COVID-19 pandemic, there is an opportunity to utilize telehealth for PRO implementation and a need for guidelines for using PROs via telehealth. This study aimed to generate expert consensus on the utilization of PROs in telehealth.

Methods: Delphi methodology was used to achieve consensus among international experts with a predetermined consensus threshold of 70%. Experts were mainly identified through the ISOQOL Clinical Practice SIG. Surveys asked a combination of structured and open-ended questions about the conceptualization of PROs in telehealth, its applicability, target population, implementation challenges and successful strategies, evaluation approaches, and the essential stakeholders. Data from each round were iteratively analyzed using descriptive statistics (quantitative data) and content analysis (qualitative data).

Results: Out of 24 invitations sent, 17 completed the first round, and 11 completed all three rounds. Respondents were equally distributed between clinicians and researchers and 70% had used PROs via telehealth before the pandemic. Consensus was achieved and some of the relevant aspects are monitoring patients for applicability; individuals with chronic diseases as the target population; resources, staff buy-in, and clinical workflow as the implementation challenges and strategies; utilization metrics for evaluation; and clinicians and patients as essential stakeholders. Though consensus was not reached for the conceptualization of PROs using telehealth, the modified FDA definition of telehealth with the addition of its purpose, and the mode of administration was the most acceptable version. See attached table.

Conclusion: The expert consensus achieved provides important insights from an international perspective on how PROs are currently used via telehealth and the needed implementation support to advance their expansion in research and practice. Lack of consensus on the definition of PROs in telehealth signals the continued rapid evolution of their use and the need for additional research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信