揭露美国的无声斗争:在物质困难时期寻求帮助。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Yeha Kim, Michelle Shumate, Peixin Hua
{"title":"揭露美国的无声斗争:在物质困难时期寻求帮助。","authors":"Yeha Kim, Michelle Shumate, Peixin Hua","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2025.2499954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health-related social needs are increasingly recognized as significantly influencing healthcare outcomes. Material hardship, defined as the inability to meet basic needs for physiological functioning, such as food and shelter, affects many Americans. This study explores the dynamics of help-seeking behavior, focusing on the perceived effectiveness of different help-seeking channels and the primary barriers associated with each. As part of a larger research project, we interviewed 27 participants aged 18 to 70 to compare help-seekers' experiences in referral programs (<i>n</i> = 14) with those without such support (<i>n</i> = 13). Our findings indicate that people turn to formal channels for complex needs, expecting tangible solutions. They resort to informal channels for less complicated issues with lower expectations. Because expectations are lower, people often describe informal support as helpful, even when the support fails to adequately address their material hardship. In contrast, individuals find help from organizations ineffective when inadequate or too slow. Stigma significantly impedes help-seeking across both channels. Systemic barriers pose the most significant barrier within formal channels, and social isolation is the most prevalent barrier within informal channels. This research provides insights into the challenges help-seekers face by identifying and understanding the barriers associated with formal and informal help-seeking channels.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling America's Silent Struggle: Help-Seeking During Material Hardship.\",\"authors\":\"Yeha Kim, Michelle Shumate, Peixin Hua\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10410236.2025.2499954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Health-related social needs are increasingly recognized as significantly influencing healthcare outcomes. Material hardship, defined as the inability to meet basic needs for physiological functioning, such as food and shelter, affects many Americans. This study explores the dynamics of help-seeking behavior, focusing on the perceived effectiveness of different help-seeking channels and the primary barriers associated with each. As part of a larger research project, we interviewed 27 participants aged 18 to 70 to compare help-seekers' experiences in referral programs (<i>n</i> = 14) with those without such support (<i>n</i> = 13). Our findings indicate that people turn to formal channels for complex needs, expecting tangible solutions. They resort to informal channels for less complicated issues with lower expectations. Because expectations are lower, people often describe informal support as helpful, even when the support fails to adequately address their material hardship. In contrast, individuals find help from organizations ineffective when inadequate or too slow. Stigma significantly impedes help-seeking across both channels. Systemic barriers pose the most significant barrier within formal channels, and social isolation is the most prevalent barrier within informal channels. This research provides insights into the challenges help-seekers face by identifying and understanding the barriers associated with formal and informal help-seeking channels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Communication\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2499954\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2499954","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们日益认识到,与健康有关的社会需求对医疗保健结果有重大影响。物质困难,定义为无法满足基本的生理功能需求,如食物和住所,影响着许多美国人。本研究探讨了求助行为的动力学,重点关注不同求助渠道的感知有效性以及与每种渠道相关的主要障碍。作为一个更大的研究项目的一部分,我们采访了27名年龄在18到70岁之间的参与者,比较寻求帮助的人在推荐项目中的经历(n = 14)和没有这种支持的人(n = 13)。我们的研究结果表明,人们转向正式渠道寻求复杂的需求,期望切实的解决方案。他们通过非正式渠道解决不太复杂的问题,期望较低。由于期望值较低,人们通常认为非正式的支持是有帮助的,即使这种支持不能充分解决他们的物质困难。相反,当组织的帮助不足或太慢时,个人会发现组织的帮助是无效的。耻辱感严重阻碍了两种渠道的求助。在正式渠道中,制度障碍是最重要的障碍,而在非正式渠道中,社会孤立是最普遍的障碍。本研究通过识别和理解与正式和非正式求助渠道相关的障碍,为寻求帮助者面临的挑战提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unveiling America's Silent Struggle: Help-Seeking During Material Hardship.

Health-related social needs are increasingly recognized as significantly influencing healthcare outcomes. Material hardship, defined as the inability to meet basic needs for physiological functioning, such as food and shelter, affects many Americans. This study explores the dynamics of help-seeking behavior, focusing on the perceived effectiveness of different help-seeking channels and the primary barriers associated with each. As part of a larger research project, we interviewed 27 participants aged 18 to 70 to compare help-seekers' experiences in referral programs (n = 14) with those without such support (n = 13). Our findings indicate that people turn to formal channels for complex needs, expecting tangible solutions. They resort to informal channels for less complicated issues with lower expectations. Because expectations are lower, people often describe informal support as helpful, even when the support fails to adequately address their material hardship. In contrast, individuals find help from organizations ineffective when inadequate or too slow. Stigma significantly impedes help-seeking across both channels. Systemic barriers pose the most significant barrier within formal channels, and social isolation is the most prevalent barrier within informal channels. This research provides insights into the challenges help-seekers face by identifying and understanding the barriers associated with formal and informal help-seeking channels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信