{"title":"揭露美国的无声斗争:在物质困难时期寻求帮助。","authors":"Yeha Kim, Michelle Shumate, Peixin Hua","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2025.2499954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health-related social needs are increasingly recognized as significantly influencing healthcare outcomes. Material hardship, defined as the inability to meet basic needs for physiological functioning, such as food and shelter, affects many Americans. This study explores the dynamics of help-seeking behavior, focusing on the perceived effectiveness of different help-seeking channels and the primary barriers associated with each. As part of a larger research project, we interviewed 27 participants aged 18 to 70 to compare help-seekers' experiences in referral programs (<i>n</i> = 14) with those without such support (<i>n</i> = 13). Our findings indicate that people turn to formal channels for complex needs, expecting tangible solutions. They resort to informal channels for less complicated issues with lower expectations. Because expectations are lower, people often describe informal support as helpful, even when the support fails to adequately address their material hardship. In contrast, individuals find help from organizations ineffective when inadequate or too slow. Stigma significantly impedes help-seeking across both channels. Systemic barriers pose the most significant barrier within formal channels, and social isolation is the most prevalent barrier within informal channels. This research provides insights into the challenges help-seekers face by identifying and understanding the barriers associated with formal and informal help-seeking channels.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling America's Silent Struggle: Help-Seeking During Material Hardship.\",\"authors\":\"Yeha Kim, Michelle Shumate, Peixin Hua\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10410236.2025.2499954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Health-related social needs are increasingly recognized as significantly influencing healthcare outcomes. Material hardship, defined as the inability to meet basic needs for physiological functioning, such as food and shelter, affects many Americans. This study explores the dynamics of help-seeking behavior, focusing on the perceived effectiveness of different help-seeking channels and the primary barriers associated with each. As part of a larger research project, we interviewed 27 participants aged 18 to 70 to compare help-seekers' experiences in referral programs (<i>n</i> = 14) with those without such support (<i>n</i> = 13). Our findings indicate that people turn to formal channels for complex needs, expecting tangible solutions. They resort to informal channels for less complicated issues with lower expectations. Because expectations are lower, people often describe informal support as helpful, even when the support fails to adequately address their material hardship. In contrast, individuals find help from organizations ineffective when inadequate or too slow. Stigma significantly impedes help-seeking across both channels. Systemic barriers pose the most significant barrier within formal channels, and social isolation is the most prevalent barrier within informal channels. This research provides insights into the challenges help-seekers face by identifying and understanding the barriers associated with formal and informal help-seeking channels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Communication\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2499954\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2499954","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unveiling America's Silent Struggle: Help-Seeking During Material Hardship.
Health-related social needs are increasingly recognized as significantly influencing healthcare outcomes. Material hardship, defined as the inability to meet basic needs for physiological functioning, such as food and shelter, affects many Americans. This study explores the dynamics of help-seeking behavior, focusing on the perceived effectiveness of different help-seeking channels and the primary barriers associated with each. As part of a larger research project, we interviewed 27 participants aged 18 to 70 to compare help-seekers' experiences in referral programs (n = 14) with those without such support (n = 13). Our findings indicate that people turn to formal channels for complex needs, expecting tangible solutions. They resort to informal channels for less complicated issues with lower expectations. Because expectations are lower, people often describe informal support as helpful, even when the support fails to adequately address their material hardship. In contrast, individuals find help from organizations ineffective when inadequate or too slow. Stigma significantly impedes help-seeking across both channels. Systemic barriers pose the most significant barrier within formal channels, and social isolation is the most prevalent barrier within informal channels. This research provides insights into the challenges help-seekers face by identifying and understanding the barriers associated with formal and informal help-seeking channels.
期刊介绍:
As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.