德国全科医生协助自杀的请求:频率、内容和动机——对全科医生经验的定性分析。

IF 2.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Luise Farr, Juliane Poeck, Claudia Bozzaro, Jutta Bleidorn
{"title":"德国全科医生协助自杀的请求:频率、内容和动机——对全科医生经验的定性分析。","authors":"Luise Farr, Juliane Poeck, Claudia Bozzaro, Jutta Bleidorn","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02830-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) has been legalised in an increasing number of countries in Western Europe. In Germany, after a landmark decision by the Federal Constitutional Court in 2020, the ban on PAS was removed from the Model Medical Code of Conduct in 2021. Although the German Medical Association makes it clear that assisted suicide (AS) is not a genuine medical task, doctors have been approached about it. As long-standing, trusted companions of their patients, general practitioners (GPs) can be predestined as initial contacts for requests regarding PAS. Aim of this study is to assess the experiences of German GPs with requests for PAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted 19 guideline-based interviews with GPs currently or formerly practicing in Germany (study period: 03/22-12/22). The verbatim transcripts were analysed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In contrast to vague death wishes, requests for PAS were described as occasional. Nearly all respondents had experienced them several times. Most interviewees did not observe an increase in requests following the 2020 ruling by the Federal Constitutional Court. So far, the GPs' role in PAS seems to be more of an advisory, informative, caring rather than an actively assisting one. According to the GPs' reports most patients requesting PAS suffered from at least one form of cancer. Another significant group of patients was not severely ill but advanced in age. Regardless of age or illness, the interviewed GPs frequently perceived the loss of autonomy and independence as a primary motive for requesting PAS. Most of the requests involved either the plea for a lethal drug, information on the lethal dose of prescribed medication, or unspecified requests for assistance with suicide. Patients requesting PAS were predominantly described as educated, reflective, and financially well-off individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individual insights into German GPs' experiences with PAS suggest a high probability for GPs to encounter requests for PAS during their practice. Knowledge of vulnerable patient groups and prominent motives behind requests for PAS can be helpful in practice, enabling physicians to better understand and adequately respond to such requests.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12016426/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Requests for physician-assisted suicide in German general practice: frequency, content, and motives- a qualitative analysis of GPs' experiences.\",\"authors\":\"Luise Farr, Juliane Poeck, Claudia Bozzaro, Jutta Bleidorn\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12875-025-02830-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) has been legalised in an increasing number of countries in Western Europe. In Germany, after a landmark decision by the Federal Constitutional Court in 2020, the ban on PAS was removed from the Model Medical Code of Conduct in 2021. Although the German Medical Association makes it clear that assisted suicide (AS) is not a genuine medical task, doctors have been approached about it. As long-standing, trusted companions of their patients, general practitioners (GPs) can be predestined as initial contacts for requests regarding PAS. Aim of this study is to assess the experiences of German GPs with requests for PAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted 19 guideline-based interviews with GPs currently or formerly practicing in Germany (study period: 03/22-12/22). The verbatim transcripts were analysed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In contrast to vague death wishes, requests for PAS were described as occasional. Nearly all respondents had experienced them several times. Most interviewees did not observe an increase in requests following the 2020 ruling by the Federal Constitutional Court. So far, the GPs' role in PAS seems to be more of an advisory, informative, caring rather than an actively assisting one. According to the GPs' reports most patients requesting PAS suffered from at least one form of cancer. Another significant group of patients was not severely ill but advanced in age. Regardless of age or illness, the interviewed GPs frequently perceived the loss of autonomy and independence as a primary motive for requesting PAS. Most of the requests involved either the plea for a lethal drug, information on the lethal dose of prescribed medication, or unspecified requests for assistance with suicide. Patients requesting PAS were predominantly described as educated, reflective, and financially well-off individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individual insights into German GPs' experiences with PAS suggest a high probability for GPs to encounter requests for PAS during their practice. Knowledge of vulnerable patient groups and prominent motives behind requests for PAS can be helpful in practice, enabling physicians to better understand and adequately respond to such requests.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC primary care\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12016426/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC primary care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02830-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02830-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在西欧越来越多的国家,医生协助自杀(PAS)已经合法化。在德国,在联邦宪法法院于2020年作出一项具有里程碑意义的决定后,2021年,对PAS的禁令从《示范医疗行为准则》中删除。尽管德国医学协会明确表示协助自杀(AS)不是一项真正的医学任务,但医生们已经就此进行了接触。作为患者长期信赖的伙伴,全科医生(gp)可以作为PAS请求的初始联系人。本研究的目的是评估德国全科医生申请PAS的经验。方法:我们对目前或以前在德国执业的全科医生进行了19次基于指南的访谈(研究期间:03/22-12/22)。采用Mayring定性内容分析法对逐字抄本进行分析。结果:与模糊的死亡愿望相比,PAS的请求被描述为偶尔的。几乎所有的受访者都经历过几次。大多数受访者认为,在联邦宪法法院(Federal Constitutional Court) 2020年做出裁决后,申请数量并未增加。到目前为止,全科医生在PAS中的作用似乎更多的是提供咨询、信息和关怀,而不是积极的协助。根据全科医生的报告,大多数要求PAS的患者至少患有一种癌症。另一组重要的患者病情并不严重,但年龄较大。无论年龄或疾病,受访的全科医生经常认为自主权和独立性的丧失是要求PAS的主要动机。大多数请求要么涉及请求提供致命药物,提供处方药物致死剂量的信息,要么涉及未指明的自杀协助请求。要求PAS的患者主要被描述为受过教育、善于反思和经济富裕的个人。结论:对德国全科医生PAS经验的个人见解表明,全科医生在执业过程中遇到PAS请求的概率很高。了解弱势患者群体和PAS请求背后的突出动机可以在实践中有所帮助,使医生能够更好地理解和充分响应此类请求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Requests for physician-assisted suicide in German general practice: frequency, content, and motives- a qualitative analysis of GPs' experiences.

Background: Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) has been legalised in an increasing number of countries in Western Europe. In Germany, after a landmark decision by the Federal Constitutional Court in 2020, the ban on PAS was removed from the Model Medical Code of Conduct in 2021. Although the German Medical Association makes it clear that assisted suicide (AS) is not a genuine medical task, doctors have been approached about it. As long-standing, trusted companions of their patients, general practitioners (GPs) can be predestined as initial contacts for requests regarding PAS. Aim of this study is to assess the experiences of German GPs with requests for PAS.

Methods: We conducted 19 guideline-based interviews with GPs currently or formerly practicing in Germany (study period: 03/22-12/22). The verbatim transcripts were analysed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis.

Results: In contrast to vague death wishes, requests for PAS were described as occasional. Nearly all respondents had experienced them several times. Most interviewees did not observe an increase in requests following the 2020 ruling by the Federal Constitutional Court. So far, the GPs' role in PAS seems to be more of an advisory, informative, caring rather than an actively assisting one. According to the GPs' reports most patients requesting PAS suffered from at least one form of cancer. Another significant group of patients was not severely ill but advanced in age. Regardless of age or illness, the interviewed GPs frequently perceived the loss of autonomy and independence as a primary motive for requesting PAS. Most of the requests involved either the plea for a lethal drug, information on the lethal dose of prescribed medication, or unspecified requests for assistance with suicide. Patients requesting PAS were predominantly described as educated, reflective, and financially well-off individuals.

Conclusion: Individual insights into German GPs' experiences with PAS suggest a high probability for GPs to encounter requests for PAS during their practice. Knowledge of vulnerable patient groups and prominent motives behind requests for PAS can be helpful in practice, enabling physicians to better understand and adequately respond to such requests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信