为心理学和神经心理学远程康复中更加道德和公平的政策和实践铺平道路:快速审查协议。

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Dorothée Morand-Grondin, Jeanne Berthod, Jennifer Sigouin, Simon Beaulieu-Bonneau, Dahlia Kairy
{"title":"为心理学和神经心理学远程康复中更加道德和公平的政策和实践铺平道路:快速审查协议。","authors":"Dorothée Morand-Grondin, Jeanne Berthod, Jennifer Sigouin, Simon Beaulieu-Bonneau, Dahlia Kairy","doi":"10.2196/66639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Virtual rehabilitation, or telerehabilitation (TR), has exponentially evolved in the last few years, gaining particular momentum since the COVID-19 pandemic. In response to a new reality of strict restrictions of physical contact necessitating the shift from in-person health services to tele-health visits, TR has seen widespread adoption. In this context, ensuring ethical and equitable TR services is crucial for establishing sustainable TR models for psychology and neuropsychology into health care systems. This requires complete and consistent guidance for clinicians and patients involved.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to synthesize existing evidence to provide timely insights on potential ethical and equitable benefits and pitfalls associated with the use of TR in a psychological and neuropsychological framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A rapid review of TR practices will be conducted specifically within the context of neuropsychology and psychology rehabilitation. We will include review articles published between 2010 and 2020 as well as original articles published between 2020 and 2023, all addressing TR issues with a main focus on neuropsychological and/or psychological rehabilitation activities. This research protocol describes the methodology, including search strategy, screening process, data extraction, and analysis methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Guided by an experienced librarian, the search strategy was designed and performed in 3 relevant databases. Articles were screened in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and data were collected by 2 independent reviewers. Data extraction is underway, and we expect to complete the rapid review in January 2025.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is part of a broader cross-Canadian initiative aimed at informing policy development and clinical practices in TR. By evaluating the ethical and equitable considerations specific to psychology and neuropsychology, this review aims to contribute to help shape future TR practices to ensure access to high-quality, accessible TR services supporting diverse patient needs in psychology and neuropsychology.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>DERR1-10.2196/66639.</p>","PeriodicalId":14755,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Research Protocols","volume":"14 ","pages":"e66639"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12056424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paving the Road for More Ethical and Equitable Policies and Practices in Telerehabilitation in Psychology and Neuropsychology: Protocol for a Rapid Review.\",\"authors\":\"Dorothée Morand-Grondin, Jeanne Berthod, Jennifer Sigouin, Simon Beaulieu-Bonneau, Dahlia Kairy\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/66639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Virtual rehabilitation, or telerehabilitation (TR), has exponentially evolved in the last few years, gaining particular momentum since the COVID-19 pandemic. In response to a new reality of strict restrictions of physical contact necessitating the shift from in-person health services to tele-health visits, TR has seen widespread adoption. In this context, ensuring ethical and equitable TR services is crucial for establishing sustainable TR models for psychology and neuropsychology into health care systems. This requires complete and consistent guidance for clinicians and patients involved.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to synthesize existing evidence to provide timely insights on potential ethical and equitable benefits and pitfalls associated with the use of TR in a psychological and neuropsychological framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A rapid review of TR practices will be conducted specifically within the context of neuropsychology and psychology rehabilitation. We will include review articles published between 2010 and 2020 as well as original articles published between 2020 and 2023, all addressing TR issues with a main focus on neuropsychological and/or psychological rehabilitation activities. This research protocol describes the methodology, including search strategy, screening process, data extraction, and analysis methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Guided by an experienced librarian, the search strategy was designed and performed in 3 relevant databases. Articles were screened in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and data were collected by 2 independent reviewers. Data extraction is underway, and we expect to complete the rapid review in January 2025.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is part of a broader cross-Canadian initiative aimed at informing policy development and clinical practices in TR. By evaluating the ethical and equitable considerations specific to psychology and neuropsychology, this review aims to contribute to help shape future TR practices to ensure access to high-quality, accessible TR services supporting diverse patient needs in psychology and neuropsychology.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>DERR1-10.2196/66639.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Research Protocols\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"e66639\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12056424/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Research Protocols\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/66639\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Research Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/66639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虚拟康复或远程康复(TR)在过去几年中呈指数级发展,自2019冠状病毒病大流行以来势头尤其强劲。严格限制身体接触的新现实要求从面对面的保健服务转向远程保健访问,为此,TR得到了广泛采用。在这种情况下,确保道德和公平的治疗服务对于在卫生保健系统中建立可持续的心理学和神经心理学治疗模式至关重要。这需要对临床医生和相关患者提供完整和一致的指导。目的:本研究的目的是综合现有证据,及时了解在心理学和神经心理学框架下使用TR相关的潜在伦理和公平利益和缺陷。方法:将在神经心理学和心理康复的背景下对TR实践进行快速回顾。我们将包括2010年至2020年之间发表的评论文章以及2020年至2023年之间发表的原创文章,这些文章都涉及TR问题,主要关注神经心理学和/或心理康复活动。本研究方案描述了研究方法,包括搜索策略、筛选过程、数据提取和分析方法。结果:在经验丰富的图书馆员的指导下,设计并实施了3个相关数据库的检索策略。根据纳入和排除标准对文献进行筛选,数据由2名独立审稿人收集。数据提取正在进行中,我们预计将于2025年1月完成快速审查。结论:本研究是一项更广泛的跨加拿大倡议的一部分,旨在为TR的政策制定和临床实践提供信息。通过评估心理学和神经心理学的伦理和公平考虑,本综述旨在帮助塑造未来的TR实践,以确保获得高质量、可访问的TR服务,支持心理学和神经心理学的不同患者需求。国际注册报告标识符(irrid): DERR1-10.2196/66639。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Paving the Road for More Ethical and Equitable Policies and Practices in Telerehabilitation in Psychology and Neuropsychology: Protocol for a Rapid Review.

Background: Virtual rehabilitation, or telerehabilitation (TR), has exponentially evolved in the last few years, gaining particular momentum since the COVID-19 pandemic. In response to a new reality of strict restrictions of physical contact necessitating the shift from in-person health services to tele-health visits, TR has seen widespread adoption. In this context, ensuring ethical and equitable TR services is crucial for establishing sustainable TR models for psychology and neuropsychology into health care systems. This requires complete and consistent guidance for clinicians and patients involved.

Objective: The objective of this study is to synthesize existing evidence to provide timely insights on potential ethical and equitable benefits and pitfalls associated with the use of TR in a psychological and neuropsychological framework.

Methods: A rapid review of TR practices will be conducted specifically within the context of neuropsychology and psychology rehabilitation. We will include review articles published between 2010 and 2020 as well as original articles published between 2020 and 2023, all addressing TR issues with a main focus on neuropsychological and/or psychological rehabilitation activities. This research protocol describes the methodology, including search strategy, screening process, data extraction, and analysis methods.

Results: Guided by an experienced librarian, the search strategy was designed and performed in 3 relevant databases. Articles were screened in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and data were collected by 2 independent reviewers. Data extraction is underway, and we expect to complete the rapid review in January 2025.

Conclusions: This study is part of a broader cross-Canadian initiative aimed at informing policy development and clinical practices in TR. By evaluating the ethical and equitable considerations specific to psychology and neuropsychology, this review aims to contribute to help shape future TR practices to ensure access to high-quality, accessible TR services supporting diverse patient needs in psychology and neuropsychology.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/66639.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
414
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信