当代腹股沟疝修补术:不同入路的费用和手术时间还不同吗?

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Benjamin C Greenspun, Daniel Aryeh Metzger, Daniella De Freitas, Gala Cygiel, Anjani Turaga, Brendan M Finnerty, Cheguevara Afaneh, Thomas J Fahey, Rasa Zarnegar
{"title":"当代腹股沟疝修补术:不同入路的费用和手术时间还不同吗?","authors":"Benjamin C Greenspun, Daniel Aryeh Metzger, Daniella De Freitas, Gala Cygiel, Anjani Turaga, Brendan M Finnerty, Cheguevara Afaneh, Thomas J Fahey, Rasa Zarnegar","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-11722-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Concerns about the expense of robotic surgery for inguinal hernia repairs have emerged alongside the growing interest and skill in robotic techniques over the past decade. This study aimed to assess whether the costs of robotic inguinal hernia repairs are comparable to those of laparoscopic or open methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repairs using mesh at a single tertiary academic medical center from 2020 to 2023. We compared costs and operation times for initial unilateral and bilateral cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In unilateral repairs-open (n = 384), laparoscopic (n = 35), and robotic (n = 312)-the median operative times were 62, 67, and 67 min, respectively. Open repairs were quicker than laparoscopic (p = 0.010), but no significant difference was noted compared to robotic repairs (p = 0.066), and there was no substantial difference between laparoscopic and robotic repairs (p = 0.5). The total costs for unilateral open repairs ($11,218) were lower than the costs for laparoscopic ($13,819, p =  < 0.001) or robotic ($15,610, p =  < 0.001) repairs, with laparoscopic also being less expensive than robotic (p = 0.019). For bilateral repairs, the median operative times were 104 min for open (n = 56), 101 min for laparoscopic (n = 23), and 88 min for robotic (n = 70). There were no significant differences in times between open and laparoscopic repairs (p = 0.6); however, robotic repairs were quicker than both open (p = 0.012) and laparoscopic (p = 0.017) repairs. The cost for laparoscopic bilateral repair was higher compared to open ($19,727 vs $18,516, p = 0.014), but robotic surgery ($19,172) did not show a significant difference when compared to open (p = 0.11) or laparoscopic (p = 0.4) repairs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bilateral inguinal hernia repair is performed most quickly using robotic techniques and exhibits costs similar to those of open and laparoscopic surgery. Further studies exploring how surgeon experience with robotics affects costs and operative time are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"3587-3591"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contemporary inguinal hernia repair: do cost and operative time still differ by approach?\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin C Greenspun, Daniel Aryeh Metzger, Daniella De Freitas, Gala Cygiel, Anjani Turaga, Brendan M Finnerty, Cheguevara Afaneh, Thomas J Fahey, Rasa Zarnegar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-025-11722-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Concerns about the expense of robotic surgery for inguinal hernia repairs have emerged alongside the growing interest and skill in robotic techniques over the past decade. This study aimed to assess whether the costs of robotic inguinal hernia repairs are comparable to those of laparoscopic or open methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repairs using mesh at a single tertiary academic medical center from 2020 to 2023. We compared costs and operation times for initial unilateral and bilateral cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In unilateral repairs-open (n = 384), laparoscopic (n = 35), and robotic (n = 312)-the median operative times were 62, 67, and 67 min, respectively. Open repairs were quicker than laparoscopic (p = 0.010), but no significant difference was noted compared to robotic repairs (p = 0.066), and there was no substantial difference between laparoscopic and robotic repairs (p = 0.5). The total costs for unilateral open repairs ($11,218) were lower than the costs for laparoscopic ($13,819, p =  < 0.001) or robotic ($15,610, p =  < 0.001) repairs, with laparoscopic also being less expensive than robotic (p = 0.019). For bilateral repairs, the median operative times were 104 min for open (n = 56), 101 min for laparoscopic (n = 23), and 88 min for robotic (n = 70). There were no significant differences in times between open and laparoscopic repairs (p = 0.6); however, robotic repairs were quicker than both open (p = 0.012) and laparoscopic (p = 0.017) repairs. The cost for laparoscopic bilateral repair was higher compared to open ($19,727 vs $18,516, p = 0.014), but robotic surgery ($19,172) did not show a significant difference when compared to open (p = 0.11) or laparoscopic (p = 0.4) repairs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bilateral inguinal hernia repair is performed most quickly using robotic techniques and exhibits costs similar to those of open and laparoscopic surgery. Further studies exploring how surgeon experience with robotics affects costs and operative time are necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3587-3591\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11722-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11722-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在过去的十年中,随着人们对机器人技术的兴趣和技能的提高,对腹股沟疝修补机器人手术费用的担忧也随之出现。本研究旨在评估机器人腹股沟疝修复的成本是否与腹腔镜或开放式方法相当。方法:我们回顾性分析了从2020年到2023年在一个三级学术医疗中心连续开放、腹腔镜和机器人腹股沟疝修补术。我们比较了单侧和双侧病例的初始费用和手术时间。结果:在单侧修复中,开放(384例)、腹腔镜(35例)和机器人(312例),中位手术时间分别为62、67和67分钟。开放式修复比腹腔镜修复快(p = 0.010),但与机器人修复相比无显著差异(p = 0.066),腹腔镜和机器人修复之间无显著差异(p = 0.5)。单侧开放式修补术的总费用(11,218美元)低于腹腔镜手术的总费用(13,819美元),p =结论:双侧腹股沟疝修补术使用机器人技术最快速,费用与开放和腹腔镜手术相似。进一步研究外科医生的机器人经验如何影响成本和手术时间是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contemporary inguinal hernia repair: do cost and operative time still differ by approach?

Background: Concerns about the expense of robotic surgery for inguinal hernia repairs have emerged alongside the growing interest and skill in robotic techniques over the past decade. This study aimed to assess whether the costs of robotic inguinal hernia repairs are comparable to those of laparoscopic or open methods.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repairs using mesh at a single tertiary academic medical center from 2020 to 2023. We compared costs and operation times for initial unilateral and bilateral cases.

Results: In unilateral repairs-open (n = 384), laparoscopic (n = 35), and robotic (n = 312)-the median operative times were 62, 67, and 67 min, respectively. Open repairs were quicker than laparoscopic (p = 0.010), but no significant difference was noted compared to robotic repairs (p = 0.066), and there was no substantial difference between laparoscopic and robotic repairs (p = 0.5). The total costs for unilateral open repairs ($11,218) were lower than the costs for laparoscopic ($13,819, p =  < 0.001) or robotic ($15,610, p =  < 0.001) repairs, with laparoscopic also being less expensive than robotic (p = 0.019). For bilateral repairs, the median operative times were 104 min for open (n = 56), 101 min for laparoscopic (n = 23), and 88 min for robotic (n = 70). There were no significant differences in times between open and laparoscopic repairs (p = 0.6); however, robotic repairs were quicker than both open (p = 0.012) and laparoscopic (p = 0.017) repairs. The cost for laparoscopic bilateral repair was higher compared to open ($19,727 vs $18,516, p = 0.014), but robotic surgery ($19,172) did not show a significant difference when compared to open (p = 0.11) or laparoscopic (p = 0.4) repairs.

Conclusions: Bilateral inguinal hernia repair is performed most quickly using robotic techniques and exhibits costs similar to those of open and laparoscopic surgery. Further studies exploring how surgeon experience with robotics affects costs and operative time are necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信