临床医生对系统性硬化症患者数字溃疡的治疗开始和升级策略的看法。

IF 1.2 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Giulia Campanaro, Giulia Bandini, Alessia Alunno, Stefano Di Donato, Begonya Alcacer-Pitarch, Ilaria Galetti, Barbara Ruaro, Silvia Bellando Randone, Alberto Moggi Pignone, Marco Matucci-Cerinic, Zsuzsanna H McMahan, Michael Hughes
{"title":"临床医生对系统性硬化症患者数字溃疡的治疗开始和升级策略的看法。","authors":"Giulia Campanaro, Giulia Bandini, Alessia Alunno, Stefano Di Donato, Begonya Alcacer-Pitarch, Ilaria Galetti, Barbara Ruaro, Silvia Bellando Randone, Alberto Moggi Pignone, Marco Matucci-Cerinic, Zsuzsanna H McMahan, Michael Hughes","doi":"10.1177/23971983251336616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Digital ulcers (DUs) are a major cause of pain and disability in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients and remain a major treatment challenge. Our aim was to explore clinicians' perspectives towards treatment initiation and escalation, akin to a 'Treat to Target' (T2T) strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SSc clinicians were invited to participate in an online survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 173 responses (75% rheumatologists) were obtained from 33 countries. When initiating a change in oral drug therapy for SSc-DUs, most (80%) respondents would consider adding new medication to existing treatment, and 50% would increase existing treatment dose. Time to assess the impact of treatment change varied considerably, with around half (43.6%) waiting 1 month. Endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors and prostanoids were considered most efficacious for DU prevention, with good perceived efficacy from calcium channel blockers and moderate benefit from anti-platelet agents and immunosuppression. Side effects (e.g. headache and peripheral oedema) are perceived to be a significant issue with oral vasodilatory/vasoactive therapies in many patients. The highest rated T2T targets were (1) complete absence of new/recurrent DUs (63%), (2) reduction >50% in the number of DU recurrence (52%) and (3) reduction in DU healing time (37%) and reduction in DU pain >50% (37%). The most frequent reasons for hospitalisation were to administer intravenous treatment (91%) and DU complications (87%). Surgery is reserved for the threatened digit (e.g. gangrene), underlying calcinosis and failure of medical therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant heterogeneity currently exists concerning treatment initiation and escalation for SSc-DUs, potentially amenable to a T2T strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"23971983251336616"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045939/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinicians' perspectives concerning treatment initiation and escalation strategies for digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Giulia Campanaro, Giulia Bandini, Alessia Alunno, Stefano Di Donato, Begonya Alcacer-Pitarch, Ilaria Galetti, Barbara Ruaro, Silvia Bellando Randone, Alberto Moggi Pignone, Marco Matucci-Cerinic, Zsuzsanna H McMahan, Michael Hughes\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23971983251336616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Digital ulcers (DUs) are a major cause of pain and disability in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients and remain a major treatment challenge. Our aim was to explore clinicians' perspectives towards treatment initiation and escalation, akin to a 'Treat to Target' (T2T) strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SSc clinicians were invited to participate in an online survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 173 responses (75% rheumatologists) were obtained from 33 countries. When initiating a change in oral drug therapy for SSc-DUs, most (80%) respondents would consider adding new medication to existing treatment, and 50% would increase existing treatment dose. Time to assess the impact of treatment change varied considerably, with around half (43.6%) waiting 1 month. Endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors and prostanoids were considered most efficacious for DU prevention, with good perceived efficacy from calcium channel blockers and moderate benefit from anti-platelet agents and immunosuppression. Side effects (e.g. headache and peripheral oedema) are perceived to be a significant issue with oral vasodilatory/vasoactive therapies in many patients. The highest rated T2T targets were (1) complete absence of new/recurrent DUs (63%), (2) reduction >50% in the number of DU recurrence (52%) and (3) reduction in DU healing time (37%) and reduction in DU pain >50% (37%). The most frequent reasons for hospitalisation were to administer intravenous treatment (91%) and DU complications (87%). Surgery is reserved for the threatened digit (e.g. gangrene), underlying calcinosis and failure of medical therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant heterogeneity currently exists concerning treatment initiation and escalation for SSc-DUs, potentially amenable to a T2T strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"23971983251336616\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045939/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23971983251336616\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23971983251336616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:数字溃疡(DUs)是系统性硬化症(SSc)患者疼痛和残疾的主要原因,并且仍然是主要的治疗挑战。我们的目的是探讨临床医生对治疗开始和升级的看法,类似于“治疗到目标”(T2T)策略。方法:邀请SSc临床医生参与在线调查。结果:共获得来自33个国家的173份回复(75%为风湿病学家)。当开始改变SSc-DUs口服药物治疗时,大多数(80%)受访者会考虑在现有治疗中添加新的药物,50%的受访者会增加现有治疗剂量。评估治疗变化影响的时间差异很大,大约一半(43.6%)等待1个月。内皮素受体拮抗剂、磷酸二酯酶5型抑制剂和前列腺素类被认为是预防DU最有效的药物,钙通道阻滞剂的疗效较好,抗血小板药物和免疫抑制剂的疗效中等。副作用(例如头痛和外周水肿)被认为是许多患者口服血管扩张/血管活性治疗的一个重要问题。最高评价的T2T目标是(1)完全没有新发/复发的DU (63%), (2) DU复发次数减少>50% (52%),(3)DU愈合时间减少(37%)和DU疼痛减少>50%(37%)。最常见的住院原因是静脉注射治疗(91%)和DU并发症(87%)。手术保留给威胁的手指(如坏疽),潜在的钙质沉着症和药物治疗失败。结论:SSc-DUs目前在治疗开始和升级方面存在显著的异质性,可能适用于T2T策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinicians' perspectives concerning treatment initiation and escalation strategies for digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis.

Objectives: Digital ulcers (DUs) are a major cause of pain and disability in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients and remain a major treatment challenge. Our aim was to explore clinicians' perspectives towards treatment initiation and escalation, akin to a 'Treat to Target' (T2T) strategy.

Methods: SSc clinicians were invited to participate in an online survey.

Results: A total of 173 responses (75% rheumatologists) were obtained from 33 countries. When initiating a change in oral drug therapy for SSc-DUs, most (80%) respondents would consider adding new medication to existing treatment, and 50% would increase existing treatment dose. Time to assess the impact of treatment change varied considerably, with around half (43.6%) waiting 1 month. Endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors and prostanoids were considered most efficacious for DU prevention, with good perceived efficacy from calcium channel blockers and moderate benefit from anti-platelet agents and immunosuppression. Side effects (e.g. headache and peripheral oedema) are perceived to be a significant issue with oral vasodilatory/vasoactive therapies in many patients. The highest rated T2T targets were (1) complete absence of new/recurrent DUs (63%), (2) reduction >50% in the number of DU recurrence (52%) and (3) reduction in DU healing time (37%) and reduction in DU pain >50% (37%). The most frequent reasons for hospitalisation were to administer intravenous treatment (91%) and DU complications (87%). Surgery is reserved for the threatened digit (e.g. gangrene), underlying calcinosis and failure of medical therapy.

Conclusion: Significant heterogeneity currently exists concerning treatment initiation and escalation for SSc-DUs, potentially amenable to a T2T strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信