Giulia Campanaro, Giulia Bandini, Alessia Alunno, Stefano Di Donato, Begonya Alcacer-Pitarch, Ilaria Galetti, Barbara Ruaro, Silvia Bellando Randone, Alberto Moggi Pignone, Marco Matucci-Cerinic, Zsuzsanna H McMahan, Michael Hughes
{"title":"临床医生对系统性硬化症患者数字溃疡的治疗开始和升级策略的看法。","authors":"Giulia Campanaro, Giulia Bandini, Alessia Alunno, Stefano Di Donato, Begonya Alcacer-Pitarch, Ilaria Galetti, Barbara Ruaro, Silvia Bellando Randone, Alberto Moggi Pignone, Marco Matucci-Cerinic, Zsuzsanna H McMahan, Michael Hughes","doi":"10.1177/23971983251336616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Digital ulcers (DUs) are a major cause of pain and disability in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients and remain a major treatment challenge. Our aim was to explore clinicians' perspectives towards treatment initiation and escalation, akin to a 'Treat to Target' (T2T) strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SSc clinicians were invited to participate in an online survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 173 responses (75% rheumatologists) were obtained from 33 countries. When initiating a change in oral drug therapy for SSc-DUs, most (80%) respondents would consider adding new medication to existing treatment, and 50% would increase existing treatment dose. Time to assess the impact of treatment change varied considerably, with around half (43.6%) waiting 1 month. Endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors and prostanoids were considered most efficacious for DU prevention, with good perceived efficacy from calcium channel blockers and moderate benefit from anti-platelet agents and immunosuppression. Side effects (e.g. headache and peripheral oedema) are perceived to be a significant issue with oral vasodilatory/vasoactive therapies in many patients. The highest rated T2T targets were (1) complete absence of new/recurrent DUs (63%), (2) reduction >50% in the number of DU recurrence (52%) and (3) reduction in DU healing time (37%) and reduction in DU pain >50% (37%). The most frequent reasons for hospitalisation were to administer intravenous treatment (91%) and DU complications (87%). Surgery is reserved for the threatened digit (e.g. gangrene), underlying calcinosis and failure of medical therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant heterogeneity currently exists concerning treatment initiation and escalation for SSc-DUs, potentially amenable to a T2T strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"23971983251336616"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045939/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinicians' perspectives concerning treatment initiation and escalation strategies for digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Giulia Campanaro, Giulia Bandini, Alessia Alunno, Stefano Di Donato, Begonya Alcacer-Pitarch, Ilaria Galetti, Barbara Ruaro, Silvia Bellando Randone, Alberto Moggi Pignone, Marco Matucci-Cerinic, Zsuzsanna H McMahan, Michael Hughes\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23971983251336616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Digital ulcers (DUs) are a major cause of pain and disability in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients and remain a major treatment challenge. Our aim was to explore clinicians' perspectives towards treatment initiation and escalation, akin to a 'Treat to Target' (T2T) strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SSc clinicians were invited to participate in an online survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 173 responses (75% rheumatologists) were obtained from 33 countries. When initiating a change in oral drug therapy for SSc-DUs, most (80%) respondents would consider adding new medication to existing treatment, and 50% would increase existing treatment dose. Time to assess the impact of treatment change varied considerably, with around half (43.6%) waiting 1 month. Endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors and prostanoids were considered most efficacious for DU prevention, with good perceived efficacy from calcium channel blockers and moderate benefit from anti-platelet agents and immunosuppression. Side effects (e.g. headache and peripheral oedema) are perceived to be a significant issue with oral vasodilatory/vasoactive therapies in many patients. The highest rated T2T targets were (1) complete absence of new/recurrent DUs (63%), (2) reduction >50% in the number of DU recurrence (52%) and (3) reduction in DU healing time (37%) and reduction in DU pain >50% (37%). The most frequent reasons for hospitalisation were to administer intravenous treatment (91%) and DU complications (87%). Surgery is reserved for the threatened digit (e.g. gangrene), underlying calcinosis and failure of medical therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant heterogeneity currently exists concerning treatment initiation and escalation for SSc-DUs, potentially amenable to a T2T strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"23971983251336616\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045939/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23971983251336616\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23971983251336616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinicians' perspectives concerning treatment initiation and escalation strategies for digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis.
Objectives: Digital ulcers (DUs) are a major cause of pain and disability in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients and remain a major treatment challenge. Our aim was to explore clinicians' perspectives towards treatment initiation and escalation, akin to a 'Treat to Target' (T2T) strategy.
Methods: SSc clinicians were invited to participate in an online survey.
Results: A total of 173 responses (75% rheumatologists) were obtained from 33 countries. When initiating a change in oral drug therapy for SSc-DUs, most (80%) respondents would consider adding new medication to existing treatment, and 50% would increase existing treatment dose. Time to assess the impact of treatment change varied considerably, with around half (43.6%) waiting 1 month. Endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors and prostanoids were considered most efficacious for DU prevention, with good perceived efficacy from calcium channel blockers and moderate benefit from anti-platelet agents and immunosuppression. Side effects (e.g. headache and peripheral oedema) are perceived to be a significant issue with oral vasodilatory/vasoactive therapies in many patients. The highest rated T2T targets were (1) complete absence of new/recurrent DUs (63%), (2) reduction >50% in the number of DU recurrence (52%) and (3) reduction in DU healing time (37%) and reduction in DU pain >50% (37%). The most frequent reasons for hospitalisation were to administer intravenous treatment (91%) and DU complications (87%). Surgery is reserved for the threatened digit (e.g. gangrene), underlying calcinosis and failure of medical therapy.
Conclusion: Significant heterogeneity currently exists concerning treatment initiation and escalation for SSc-DUs, potentially amenable to a T2T strategy.