红霉素或克林霉素耐药与MSSA菌血症患者30天死亡率的关系

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Tiffany A Russo, Brooke Broczkowski, Samantha Sallerson, Alexander Knee, Michael P Lorenzo
{"title":"红霉素或克林霉素耐药与MSSA菌血症患者30天死亡率的关系","authors":"Tiffany A Russo, Brooke Broczkowski, Samantha Sallerson, Alexander Knee, Michael P Lorenzo","doi":"10.1177/08971900251335106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The objective of the present study is to assess the association of erythromycin and clindamycin susceptibilities with 30-day mortality in patients with MSSA bacteremia treated with cefazolin. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective cohort study of patients with least one positive blood culture growing MSSA and treated with cefazolin for at least 3 consecutive days. Groups included patients who had an MSSA strain that was both erythromycin and clindamycin susceptible (E/C-S), the comparator group included patients with erythromycin resistant and clindamycin resistant or susceptible (E/C-R) MSSA strains. The relative risk for 30-day mortality was calculated for E/C-R compared to E/C-S along with the sensitivity and specificity for E/C-R as a predictor of 30-day mortality. <b>Results:</b> A total of 114 patients were eligible for analysis; with 72 (63%) categorized in the E/C-S group and 42 (37%) categorized in the E/C-R group. The primary outcome of 30-day mortality was met in 7 (10%) patients in the E/C-S group vs 7 (17%) in the E/C-R group; unadjusted relative risk (95% CI) 1.71 (0.65-4.55). The sensitivity and specificity of E/C-R as a predictor of 30-day mortality was 50% (95% CI = 23-77) and 65% (95% CI = 55-74), respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> This exploratory study did not find clindamycin or erythromycin susceptibility to be associated with 30-day mortality in patients treated with cefazolin for MSSA bacteremia. The relevance of this surrogate marker in clinical practice is negligible due to its limitations, and future investigations are required to establish pragmatic means of detecting isolates which may be insufficiently treated with cefazolin.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"8971900251335106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Erythromycin or Clindamycin Resistance and 30-Day Mortality in Patients With MSSA Bacteremia.\",\"authors\":\"Tiffany A Russo, Brooke Broczkowski, Samantha Sallerson, Alexander Knee, Michael P Lorenzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08971900251335106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The objective of the present study is to assess the association of erythromycin and clindamycin susceptibilities with 30-day mortality in patients with MSSA bacteremia treated with cefazolin. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective cohort study of patients with least one positive blood culture growing MSSA and treated with cefazolin for at least 3 consecutive days. Groups included patients who had an MSSA strain that was both erythromycin and clindamycin susceptible (E/C-S), the comparator group included patients with erythromycin resistant and clindamycin resistant or susceptible (E/C-R) MSSA strains. The relative risk for 30-day mortality was calculated for E/C-R compared to E/C-S along with the sensitivity and specificity for E/C-R as a predictor of 30-day mortality. <b>Results:</b> A total of 114 patients were eligible for analysis; with 72 (63%) categorized in the E/C-S group and 42 (37%) categorized in the E/C-R group. The primary outcome of 30-day mortality was met in 7 (10%) patients in the E/C-S group vs 7 (17%) in the E/C-R group; unadjusted relative risk (95% CI) 1.71 (0.65-4.55). The sensitivity and specificity of E/C-R as a predictor of 30-day mortality was 50% (95% CI = 23-77) and 65% (95% CI = 55-74), respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> This exploratory study did not find clindamycin or erythromycin susceptibility to be associated with 30-day mortality in patients treated with cefazolin for MSSA bacteremia. The relevance of this surrogate marker in clinical practice is negligible due to its limitations, and future investigations are required to establish pragmatic means of detecting isolates which may be insufficiently treated with cefazolin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pharmacy practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8971900251335106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pharmacy practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900251335106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900251335106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估红霉素和克林霉素敏感性与头孢唑林治疗的MSSA菌血症患者30天死亡率的关系。方法:对至少1例血培养阳性的MSSA患者进行回顾性队列研究,并连续3天以上接受头孢唑林治疗。组包括红霉素和克林霉素均敏感的MSSA菌株(E/C-S),对照组包括红霉素耐药和克林霉素耐药或敏感的MSSA菌株(E/C-R)。计算E/C-R相对于E/C-S的30天死亡率的相对风险,以及E/C-R作为30天死亡率预测因子的敏感性和特异性。结果:共有114例患者符合分析条件;72人(63%)属于E/C-S组,42人(37%)属于E/C-R组。E/C-S组有7例(10%)患者达到了30天死亡率的主要终点,而E/C-R组有7例(17%);未调整相对危险度(95% CI) 1.71(0.65-4.55)。E/C-R作为30天死亡率预测因子的敏感性和特异性分别为50% (95% CI = 23-77)和65% (95% CI = 55-74)。结论:本探索性研究未发现头孢唑林治疗MSSA菌血症患者的克林霉素或红霉素敏感性与30天死亡率相关。由于其局限性,这种替代标记物在临床实践中的相关性可以忽略不计,未来的研究需要建立实用的方法来检测可能用头孢唑林治疗不足的分离株。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association Between Erythromycin or Clindamycin Resistance and 30-Day Mortality in Patients With MSSA Bacteremia.

Objectives: The objective of the present study is to assess the association of erythromycin and clindamycin susceptibilities with 30-day mortality in patients with MSSA bacteremia treated with cefazolin. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients with least one positive blood culture growing MSSA and treated with cefazolin for at least 3 consecutive days. Groups included patients who had an MSSA strain that was both erythromycin and clindamycin susceptible (E/C-S), the comparator group included patients with erythromycin resistant and clindamycin resistant or susceptible (E/C-R) MSSA strains. The relative risk for 30-day mortality was calculated for E/C-R compared to E/C-S along with the sensitivity and specificity for E/C-R as a predictor of 30-day mortality. Results: A total of 114 patients were eligible for analysis; with 72 (63%) categorized in the E/C-S group and 42 (37%) categorized in the E/C-R group. The primary outcome of 30-day mortality was met in 7 (10%) patients in the E/C-S group vs 7 (17%) in the E/C-R group; unadjusted relative risk (95% CI) 1.71 (0.65-4.55). The sensitivity and specificity of E/C-R as a predictor of 30-day mortality was 50% (95% CI = 23-77) and 65% (95% CI = 55-74), respectively. Conclusions: This exploratory study did not find clindamycin or erythromycin susceptibility to be associated with 30-day mortality in patients treated with cefazolin for MSSA bacteremia. The relevance of this surrogate marker in clinical practice is negligible due to its limitations, and future investigations are required to establish pragmatic means of detecting isolates which may be insufficiently treated with cefazolin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信