认知筛查告知转诊儿童癫痫的神经心理学评估。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-04-26 DOI:10.1111/epi.18421
Kristina E Patrick, Allison N Shields, Holly A Dustin, Anup D Patel, Kelly McNally
{"title":"认知筛查告知转诊儿童癫痫的神经心理学评估。","authors":"Kristina E Patrick, Allison N Shields, Holly A Dustin, Anup D Patel, Kelly McNally","doi":"10.1111/epi.18421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of current neuropsychology referral methods for children with epilepsy and develop data-informed recommendations for use of performance-based cognitive screening measures to improve these processes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children with epilepsy who had been referred to neuropsychology (n = 51) or had never been referred (n = 34) completed four brief tablet-based screening tests from the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery along with a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery. Demographics, medical information, and parent questionnaires were gathered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean performance on the neuropsychological test battery was worse in the referral group (p = .008, d = .52), but percentage of patients who presented with cognitive impairment (at least two scores 1.5 SD below the mean) did not differ. Demographics did not predict performance on the comprehensive neurocognitive battery (p = .46, <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>R</mi> <mtext>change</mtext> <mn>2</mn></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {R}_{\\mathrm{change}}^2 $$</annotation></semantics> </math>  = .06). Medical variables added some predictive value (p = .004, <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>R</mi> <mtext>change</mtext> <mn>2</mn></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {R}_{\\mathrm{change}}^2 $$</annotation></semantics> </math>  = .25). Parent questionnaires added minimal value (p = .066, <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>R</mi> <mtext>change</mtext> <mn>2</mn></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {R}_{\\mathrm{change}}^2 $$</annotation></semantics> </math>  = .05) beyond the previous variables. Performance on the cognitive screening battery added significant predictive value (p < .001, <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>R</mi> <mtext>change</mtext> <mn>2</mn></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {R}_{\\mathrm{change}}^2 $$</annotation></semantics> </math>  = .31) above demographics, medical variables, and parent questionnaires, explaining 31% additional variance in performance on the comprehensive neuropsychological battery. Stepwise analysis suggested that only three screening tests, totaling 15 min of administration time, were necessary. A cutoff score of .70 SD below the mean on any of those screening tests had high sensitivity (.90) while maintaining specificity > .50. A cutoff score of 1 SD below the mean provided better balance of sensitivity (.74) and specificity (.70).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Brief and easy to administer performance-based cognitive screening may add value and reduce bias when making decisions about neuropsychology referrals for children with epilepsy. An ideal clinical model could include neuropsychology consultation with chart review, clinical interview, questionnaires, and brief cognitive screening to inform referrals for more comprehensive evaluation. In settings where this is not possible, cognitive screening may be a useful and minimally resource-intensive method for informing referral decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive screening informs referrals for neuropsychological evaluation in children with epilepsy.\",\"authors\":\"Kristina E Patrick, Allison N Shields, Holly A Dustin, Anup D Patel, Kelly McNally\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of current neuropsychology referral methods for children with epilepsy and develop data-informed recommendations for use of performance-based cognitive screening measures to improve these processes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children with epilepsy who had been referred to neuropsychology (n = 51) or had never been referred (n = 34) completed four brief tablet-based screening tests from the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery along with a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery. Demographics, medical information, and parent questionnaires were gathered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean performance on the neuropsychological test battery was worse in the referral group (p = .008, d = .52), but percentage of patients who presented with cognitive impairment (at least two scores 1.5 SD below the mean) did not differ. Demographics did not predict performance on the comprehensive neurocognitive battery (p = .46, <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>R</mi> <mtext>change</mtext> <mn>2</mn></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {R}_{\\\\mathrm{change}}^2 $$</annotation></semantics> </math>  = .06). Medical variables added some predictive value (p = .004, <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>R</mi> <mtext>change</mtext> <mn>2</mn></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {R}_{\\\\mathrm{change}}^2 $$</annotation></semantics> </math>  = .25). Parent questionnaires added minimal value (p = .066, <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>R</mi> <mtext>change</mtext> <mn>2</mn></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {R}_{\\\\mathrm{change}}^2 $$</annotation></semantics> </math>  = .05) beyond the previous variables. Performance on the cognitive screening battery added significant predictive value (p < .001, <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>R</mi> <mtext>change</mtext> <mn>2</mn></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {R}_{\\\\mathrm{change}}^2 $$</annotation></semantics> </math>  = .31) above demographics, medical variables, and parent questionnaires, explaining 31% additional variance in performance on the comprehensive neuropsychological battery. Stepwise analysis suggested that only three screening tests, totaling 15 min of administration time, were necessary. A cutoff score of .70 SD below the mean on any of those screening tests had high sensitivity (.90) while maintaining specificity > .50. A cutoff score of 1 SD below the mean provided better balance of sensitivity (.74) and specificity (.70).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Brief and easy to administer performance-based cognitive screening may add value and reduce bias when making decisions about neuropsychology referrals for children with epilepsy. An ideal clinical model could include neuropsychology consultation with chart review, clinical interview, questionnaires, and brief cognitive screening to inform referrals for more comprehensive evaluation. In settings where this is not possible, cognitive screening may be a useful and minimally resource-intensive method for informing referral decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18421\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18421","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估当前癫痫儿童神经心理学转诊方法的有效性,并为使用基于表现的认知筛查措施提出数据支持的建议,以改善这些过程。方法:曾接受神经心理学检查的癫痫患儿(n = 51)或从未接受神经心理学检查的癫痫患儿(n = 34)完成了来自美国国立卫生研究院工具箱认知测试组的四项简短的基于片剂的筛查试验以及综合神经心理学测试组。收集了人口统计、医疗信息和家长问卷。结果:转诊组在神经心理测试中的平均表现较差(p =。008, d = .52),但表现为认知障碍(至少两次得分低于平均值1.5 SD)的患者百分比没有差异。人口统计学不能预测综合神经认知电池的表现(p =。46, R变化2 $$ {R}_{\mathrm{change}}^2 $$ = .06)。医学变量增加了一些预测价值(p =。004, R变化2 $$ {R}_{\mathrm{change}}^2 $$ = .25)。父母问卷增加的价值最小(p =。066, R变化2 $$ {R}_{\mathrm{change}}^2 $$ = .05)超出前面的变量。认知筛查组的表现在人口统计学、医学变量和父母问卷调查上增加了显著的预测价值(p R变化2 $$ {R}_{\mathrm{change}}^2 $$ = .31),解释了31% additional variance in performance on the comprehensive neuropsychological battery. Stepwise analysis suggested that only three screening tests, totaling 15 min of administration time, were necessary. A cutoff score of .70 SD below the mean on any of those screening tests had high sensitivity (.90) while maintaining specificity > .50. A cutoff score of 1 SD below the mean provided better balance of sensitivity (.74) and specificity (.70).Significance: Brief and easy to administer performance-based cognitive screening may add value and reduce bias when making decisions about neuropsychology referrals for children with epilepsy. An ideal clinical model could include neuropsychology consultation with chart review, clinical interview, questionnaires, and brief cognitive screening to inform referrals for more comprehensive evaluation. In settings where this is not possible, cognitive screening may be a useful and minimally resource-intensive method for informing referral decisions.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive screening informs referrals for neuropsychological evaluation in children with epilepsy.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of current neuropsychology referral methods for children with epilepsy and develop data-informed recommendations for use of performance-based cognitive screening measures to improve these processes.

Methods: Children with epilepsy who had been referred to neuropsychology (n = 51) or had never been referred (n = 34) completed four brief tablet-based screening tests from the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery along with a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery. Demographics, medical information, and parent questionnaires were gathered.

Results: Mean performance on the neuropsychological test battery was worse in the referral group (p = .008, d = .52), but percentage of patients who presented with cognitive impairment (at least two scores 1.5 SD below the mean) did not differ. Demographics did not predict performance on the comprehensive neurocognitive battery (p = .46, R change 2 $$ {R}_{\mathrm{change}}^2 $$  = .06). Medical variables added some predictive value (p = .004, R change 2 $$ {R}_{\mathrm{change}}^2 $$  = .25). Parent questionnaires added minimal value (p = .066, R change 2 $$ {R}_{\mathrm{change}}^2 $$  = .05) beyond the previous variables. Performance on the cognitive screening battery added significant predictive value (p < .001, R change 2 $$ {R}_{\mathrm{change}}^2 $$  = .31) above demographics, medical variables, and parent questionnaires, explaining 31% additional variance in performance on the comprehensive neuropsychological battery. Stepwise analysis suggested that only three screening tests, totaling 15 min of administration time, were necessary. A cutoff score of .70 SD below the mean on any of those screening tests had high sensitivity (.90) while maintaining specificity > .50. A cutoff score of 1 SD below the mean provided better balance of sensitivity (.74) and specificity (.70).

Significance: Brief and easy to administer performance-based cognitive screening may add value and reduce bias when making decisions about neuropsychology referrals for children with epilepsy. An ideal clinical model could include neuropsychology consultation with chart review, clinical interview, questionnaires, and brief cognitive screening to inform referrals for more comprehensive evaluation. In settings where this is not possible, cognitive screening may be a useful and minimally resource-intensive method for informing referral decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信