Aryan Banitalebi, Ivar Rossvoll, Hasan Banitalebi, Tor Åge Myklebust, Erland Hermansen
{"title":"腰椎管狭窄症仰卧位MRI与站立位x线片的脊柱骨盆角度及放大比较。","authors":"Aryan Banitalebi, Ivar Rossvoll, Hasan Banitalebi, Tor Åge Myklebust, Erland Hermansen","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Radiologic cross-sectional study based on a prospective cohort study (level III).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Investigate whether lumbar lordosis (LL) and sacral slope (SS) differ significantly on supine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus standing radiographs in nondeformity lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Secondly, to quantify the amount of magnification on standing lumbar radiographs.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Supine MRI is routinely performed when diagnosing LSS. Standing radiographs are often supplemented to measure spinopelvic angles. Little research has been done on whether LL and SS translate from standing radiographs to supine MRI. Previous studies have trended to significant changes in LL and SS; however, none have been performed exclusively in nondeformity LSS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Review of preoperative standing lateral lumbar radiographs and midsagittal T2-weighted supine lumbar MRI in 211 patients with LSS without concomitant degenerative spondylolisthesis, measuring LL (L1-S1), segmental lumbar lordosis (sLL) (L4-S1) and SS, in addition to the anteroposterior diameter and height of the L3 vertebral body. We conducted a reliability study and performed a Pearson's correlation analysis. Data was presented in Bland-Altman plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interobserver reliability was good to excellent, with ICC ranging from 0.77 to 0.94 for all parameters. Statistically significant differences were observed in LL and SS between image modalities. The mean radiographic measurements were as follows: LL 48.9 (SD: 12.8), sLL 32.3 (SD: 8.1), and SS 37.3 (SD: 8.7) degrees. The mean MRI measurements were as follows: LL 46.0 (SD: 10.5), sLL 32.3 (SD: 7.1), and SS 38.1 (SD: 7.1) degrees. Mean vertebral body magnification was between 21% and 23% for L3 anteroposterior diameter and height.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that supine lumbar MRI might be a viable alternative to standing lateral lumbar radiographs for measuring LL and SS in routine follow-up for patients with LSS without concomitant spinal deformity. Standing radiographs are recommended as part of the initial investigation for LSS. Standing lumbar radiographs may yield high grades of magnification.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Spinopelvic Angles and Magnification on Supine MRI With Standing Radiographs in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"Aryan Banitalebi, Ivar Rossvoll, Hasan Banitalebi, Tor Åge Myklebust, Erland Hermansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Radiologic cross-sectional study based on a prospective cohort study (level III).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Investigate whether lumbar lordosis (LL) and sacral slope (SS) differ significantly on supine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus standing radiographs in nondeformity lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Secondly, to quantify the amount of magnification on standing lumbar radiographs.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Supine MRI is routinely performed when diagnosing LSS. Standing radiographs are often supplemented to measure spinopelvic angles. Little research has been done on whether LL and SS translate from standing radiographs to supine MRI. Previous studies have trended to significant changes in LL and SS; however, none have been performed exclusively in nondeformity LSS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Review of preoperative standing lateral lumbar radiographs and midsagittal T2-weighted supine lumbar MRI in 211 patients with LSS without concomitant degenerative spondylolisthesis, measuring LL (L1-S1), segmental lumbar lordosis (sLL) (L4-S1) and SS, in addition to the anteroposterior diameter and height of the L3 vertebral body. We conducted a reliability study and performed a Pearson's correlation analysis. Data was presented in Bland-Altman plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interobserver reliability was good to excellent, with ICC ranging from 0.77 to 0.94 for all parameters. Statistically significant differences were observed in LL and SS between image modalities. The mean radiographic measurements were as follows: LL 48.9 (SD: 12.8), sLL 32.3 (SD: 8.1), and SS 37.3 (SD: 8.7) degrees. The mean MRI measurements were as follows: LL 46.0 (SD: 10.5), sLL 32.3 (SD: 7.1), and SS 38.1 (SD: 7.1) degrees. Mean vertebral body magnification was between 21% and 23% for L3 anteroposterior diameter and height.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that supine lumbar MRI might be a viable alternative to standing lateral lumbar radiographs for measuring LL and SS in routine follow-up for patients with LSS without concomitant spinal deformity. Standing radiographs are recommended as part of the initial investigation for LSS. Standing lumbar radiographs may yield high grades of magnification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001814\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001814","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparing Spinopelvic Angles and Magnification on Supine MRI With Standing Radiographs in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Study design: Radiologic cross-sectional study based on a prospective cohort study (level III).
Objective: Investigate whether lumbar lordosis (LL) and sacral slope (SS) differ significantly on supine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus standing radiographs in nondeformity lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Secondly, to quantify the amount of magnification on standing lumbar radiographs.
Summary of background data: Supine MRI is routinely performed when diagnosing LSS. Standing radiographs are often supplemented to measure spinopelvic angles. Little research has been done on whether LL and SS translate from standing radiographs to supine MRI. Previous studies have trended to significant changes in LL and SS; however, none have been performed exclusively in nondeformity LSS.
Materials and methods: Review of preoperative standing lateral lumbar radiographs and midsagittal T2-weighted supine lumbar MRI in 211 patients with LSS without concomitant degenerative spondylolisthesis, measuring LL (L1-S1), segmental lumbar lordosis (sLL) (L4-S1) and SS, in addition to the anteroposterior diameter and height of the L3 vertebral body. We conducted a reliability study and performed a Pearson's correlation analysis. Data was presented in Bland-Altman plots.
Results: Interobserver reliability was good to excellent, with ICC ranging from 0.77 to 0.94 for all parameters. Statistically significant differences were observed in LL and SS between image modalities. The mean radiographic measurements were as follows: LL 48.9 (SD: 12.8), sLL 32.3 (SD: 8.1), and SS 37.3 (SD: 8.7) degrees. The mean MRI measurements were as follows: LL 46.0 (SD: 10.5), sLL 32.3 (SD: 7.1), and SS 38.1 (SD: 7.1) degrees. Mean vertebral body magnification was between 21% and 23% for L3 anteroposterior diameter and height.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that supine lumbar MRI might be a viable alternative to standing lateral lumbar radiographs for measuring LL and SS in routine follow-up for patients with LSS without concomitant spinal deformity. Standing radiographs are recommended as part of the initial investigation for LSS. Standing lumbar radiographs may yield high grades of magnification.
期刊介绍：
Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure.
Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
