通过桡骨中外侧入路对A2滑轮处扳机指进行滑轮松解的结果。

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
Naomi Hanaka, Masatoshi Takahara, Junichiro Shibuya, Hiroshi Satake, Michiaki Takagi
{"title":"通过桡骨中外侧入路对A2滑轮处扳机指进行滑轮松解的结果。","authors":"Naomi Hanaka, Masatoshi Takahara, Junichiro Shibuya, Hiroshi Satake, Michiaki Takagi","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Trigger finger occurs primarily at the A1 pulley. However, triggering of the flexor tendon can also occur at the A2 pulley. The full release of the A2 pulley should be avoided because it may cause bowstringing and flexion weakness. To reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, we have performed a complete release of the A1 pulley via a volar approach and a complete release of the A2 pulley at the radial edge via a radial mid-lateral approach. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of our procedure. <b>Methods:</b> Seventeen fingers underwent A2 pulley release at the radial edge via a mid-lateral approach after complete release of the A1 pulley via a volar approach. The mean age of patients was 68 years. Regarding the Quinnell classification, 15 fingers were grade IV, 1 finger was grade II with triggering at the A2 pulley level and 1 finger was grade I with a ganglion on the A1 pulley. <b>Results:</b> The mean extension loss of the PIP joint was 23° preoperatively and 2° at the final examination, and the respective mean tip-palmar distances were 19 mm and 3 mm. No symptoms or signs suggested the bowstring of the flexor tendon during the observation period (mean: 99 weeks; range: 19-180 weeks). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our procedure is preferable for managing the tenosynovitis at the A1 and A2 pulleys. The release of the A2 pulley at the radial edge via a radial mid-lateral approach yielded a favourable result without bowstringing. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":"306-311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of Pulley Release via a Radial Mid-Lateral Approach for the Trigger Finger at the A2 Pulley.\",\"authors\":\"Naomi Hanaka, Masatoshi Takahara, Junichiro Shibuya, Hiroshi Satake, Michiaki Takagi\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S2424835525500365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Trigger finger occurs primarily at the A1 pulley. However, triggering of the flexor tendon can also occur at the A2 pulley. The full release of the A2 pulley should be avoided because it may cause bowstringing and flexion weakness. To reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, we have performed a complete release of the A1 pulley via a volar approach and a complete release of the A2 pulley at the radial edge via a radial mid-lateral approach. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of our procedure. <b>Methods:</b> Seventeen fingers underwent A2 pulley release at the radial edge via a mid-lateral approach after complete release of the A1 pulley via a volar approach. The mean age of patients was 68 years. Regarding the Quinnell classification, 15 fingers were grade IV, 1 finger was grade II with triggering at the A2 pulley level and 1 finger was grade I with a ganglion on the A1 pulley. <b>Results:</b> The mean extension loss of the PIP joint was 23° preoperatively and 2° at the final examination, and the respective mean tip-palmar distances were 19 mm and 3 mm. No symptoms or signs suggested the bowstring of the flexor tendon during the observation period (mean: 99 weeks; range: 19-180 weeks). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our procedure is preferable for managing the tenosynovitis at the A1 and A2 pulleys. The release of the A2 pulley at the radial edge via a radial mid-lateral approach yielded a favourable result without bowstringing. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Therapeutic).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"306-311\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:扳机指主要发生在A1滑轮处。然而,A2滑轮也可能触发屈肌腱。应避免完全释放A2滑轮,因为它可能导致弓弦和屈曲无力。为了减少术后并发症的发生,我们通过掌侧入路对A1滑轮进行了完全松解,并通过桡骨中外侧入路在桡骨边缘对A2滑轮进行了完全松解。本研究旨在探讨我们手术的结果。方法:17个手指经掌侧入路完全解除A1滑轮后,经中外侧入路在桡骨边缘解除A2滑轮。患者平均年龄为68岁。Quinnell分级中,15个手指为IV级,1个手指为II级,在A2滑轮水平触发,1个手指为I级,在A1滑轮上有神经节。结果:PIP关节术前平均伸度损失为23°,最终检查时平均伸度损失为2°,指尖与掌心距离分别为19 mm和3 mm。观察期间(平均99周;范围:19-180周)。结论:我们的手术是治疗A1和A2滑膜处腱鞘炎的首选方法。通过桡骨中外侧入路在桡骨边缘释放A2滑轮获得了良好的结果,没有弓形弓弦。证据等级:IV级(治疗性)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcome of Pulley Release via a Radial Mid-Lateral Approach for the Trigger Finger at the A2 Pulley.

Background: Trigger finger occurs primarily at the A1 pulley. However, triggering of the flexor tendon can also occur at the A2 pulley. The full release of the A2 pulley should be avoided because it may cause bowstringing and flexion weakness. To reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, we have performed a complete release of the A1 pulley via a volar approach and a complete release of the A2 pulley at the radial edge via a radial mid-lateral approach. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of our procedure. Methods: Seventeen fingers underwent A2 pulley release at the radial edge via a mid-lateral approach after complete release of the A1 pulley via a volar approach. The mean age of patients was 68 years. Regarding the Quinnell classification, 15 fingers were grade IV, 1 finger was grade II with triggering at the A2 pulley level and 1 finger was grade I with a ganglion on the A1 pulley. Results: The mean extension loss of the PIP joint was 23° preoperatively and 2° at the final examination, and the respective mean tip-palmar distances were 19 mm and 3 mm. No symptoms or signs suggested the bowstring of the flexor tendon during the observation period (mean: 99 weeks; range: 19-180 weeks). Conclusions: Our procedure is preferable for managing the tenosynovitis at the A1 and A2 pulleys. The release of the A2 pulley at the radial edge via a radial mid-lateral approach yielded a favourable result without bowstringing. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
304
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信