{"title":"揭穿关于非洲与堕胎有关的孕产妇死亡率的错误信息。","authors":"Lynn M Morgan, Claire L Wendland","doi":"10.1080/17441692.2025.2499915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An emerging body of literature misinterprets and misrepresents the scholarship on African maternal mortality to advance the political agenda of anti-abortion advocates. The African region accounts for 70% of global maternal deaths, a figure that has justified a regional, evidence-based movement to loosen restrictive abortion laws. Anti-abortion activists have reacted by working to cast doubt on the scientific consensus that accessible legal abortion saves lives. The misinformation they produce justifies abortion restrictions—including criminalization—that worsen maternal mortality and morbidity, undermine gender equity by constraining women's reproductive rights, and exacerbate risks especially for young, rural, unmarried, and poor women. As an anthropologist who studies global anti-abortion strategies and a physician-anthropologist who has practiced obstetrics and gynecology in Malawi, respectively, we write to identify the deceptive tactics and debunk the false claims featured in recent publications by abortion opponents. Our goal is to prepare readers who care about reducing maternal mortality—no matter their moral perspectives on abortion—to recognize and refute misinformation. We conclude with suggestions for how researchers might move beyond ideological disagreements to improve maternal health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12735,"journal":{"name":"Global Public Health","volume":"20 1","pages":"2499915"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Debunking misinformation about abortion-related maternal mortality in Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Lynn M Morgan, Claire L Wendland\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17441692.2025.2499915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An emerging body of literature misinterprets and misrepresents the scholarship on African maternal mortality to advance the political agenda of anti-abortion advocates. The African region accounts for 70% of global maternal deaths, a figure that has justified a regional, evidence-based movement to loosen restrictive abortion laws. Anti-abortion activists have reacted by working to cast doubt on the scientific consensus that accessible legal abortion saves lives. The misinformation they produce justifies abortion restrictions—including criminalization—that worsen maternal mortality and morbidity, undermine gender equity by constraining women's reproductive rights, and exacerbate risks especially for young, rural, unmarried, and poor women. As an anthropologist who studies global anti-abortion strategies and a physician-anthropologist who has practiced obstetrics and gynecology in Malawi, respectively, we write to identify the deceptive tactics and debunk the false claims featured in recent publications by abortion opponents. Our goal is to prepare readers who care about reducing maternal mortality—no matter their moral perspectives on abortion—to recognize and refute misinformation. We conclude with suggestions for how researchers might move beyond ideological disagreements to improve maternal health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Public Health\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"2499915\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2499915\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2499915","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Debunking misinformation about abortion-related maternal mortality in Africa.
An emerging body of literature misinterprets and misrepresents the scholarship on African maternal mortality to advance the political agenda of anti-abortion advocates. The African region accounts for 70% of global maternal deaths, a figure that has justified a regional, evidence-based movement to loosen restrictive abortion laws. Anti-abortion activists have reacted by working to cast doubt on the scientific consensus that accessible legal abortion saves lives. The misinformation they produce justifies abortion restrictions—including criminalization—that worsen maternal mortality and morbidity, undermine gender equity by constraining women's reproductive rights, and exacerbate risks especially for young, rural, unmarried, and poor women. As an anthropologist who studies global anti-abortion strategies and a physician-anthropologist who has practiced obstetrics and gynecology in Malawi, respectively, we write to identify the deceptive tactics and debunk the false claims featured in recent publications by abortion opponents. Our goal is to prepare readers who care about reducing maternal mortality—no matter their moral perspectives on abortion—to recognize and refute misinformation. We conclude with suggestions for how researchers might move beyond ideological disagreements to improve maternal health.
期刊介绍:
Global Public Health is an essential peer-reviewed journal that energetically engages with key public health issues that have come to the fore in the global environment — mounting inequalities between rich and poor; the globalization of trade; new patterns of travel and migration; epidemics of newly-emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases; the HIV/AIDS pandemic; the increase in chronic illnesses; escalating pressure on public health infrastructures around the world; and the growing range and scale of conflict situations, terrorist threats, environmental pressures, natural and human-made disasters.