揭穿关于非洲与堕胎有关的孕产妇死亡率的错误信息。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Global Public Health Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-02 DOI:10.1080/17441692.2025.2499915
Lynn M Morgan, Claire L Wendland
{"title":"揭穿关于非洲与堕胎有关的孕产妇死亡率的错误信息。","authors":"Lynn M Morgan, Claire L Wendland","doi":"10.1080/17441692.2025.2499915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An emerging body of literature misinterprets and misrepresents the scholarship on African maternal mortality to advance the political agenda of anti-abortion advocates. The African region accounts for 70% of global maternal deaths, a figure that has justified a regional, evidence-based movement to loosen restrictive abortion laws. Anti-abortion activists have reacted by working to cast doubt on the scientific consensus that accessible legal abortion saves lives. The misinformation they produce justifies abortion restrictions—including criminalization—that worsen maternal mortality and morbidity, undermine gender equity by constraining women's reproductive rights, and exacerbate risks especially for young, rural, unmarried, and poor women. As an anthropologist who studies global anti-abortion strategies and a physician-anthropologist who has practiced obstetrics and gynecology in Malawi, respectively, we write to identify the deceptive tactics and debunk the false claims featured in recent publications by abortion opponents. Our goal is to prepare readers who care about reducing maternal mortality—no matter their moral perspectives on abortion—to recognize and refute misinformation. We conclude with suggestions for how researchers might move beyond ideological disagreements to improve maternal health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12735,"journal":{"name":"Global Public Health","volume":"20 1","pages":"2499915"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Debunking misinformation about abortion-related maternal mortality in Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Lynn M Morgan, Claire L Wendland\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17441692.2025.2499915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An emerging body of literature misinterprets and misrepresents the scholarship on African maternal mortality to advance the political agenda of anti-abortion advocates. The African region accounts for 70% of global maternal deaths, a figure that has justified a regional, evidence-based movement to loosen restrictive abortion laws. Anti-abortion activists have reacted by working to cast doubt on the scientific consensus that accessible legal abortion saves lives. The misinformation they produce justifies abortion restrictions—including criminalization—that worsen maternal mortality and morbidity, undermine gender equity by constraining women's reproductive rights, and exacerbate risks especially for young, rural, unmarried, and poor women. As an anthropologist who studies global anti-abortion strategies and a physician-anthropologist who has practiced obstetrics and gynecology in Malawi, respectively, we write to identify the deceptive tactics and debunk the false claims featured in recent publications by abortion opponents. Our goal is to prepare readers who care about reducing maternal mortality—no matter their moral perspectives on abortion—to recognize and refute misinformation. We conclude with suggestions for how researchers might move beyond ideological disagreements to improve maternal health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Public Health\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"2499915\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2499915\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2499915","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了推进反堕胎倡导者的政治议程,一个新兴的文献机构误解和歪曲了关于非洲孕产妇死亡率的学术研究。非洲地区占全球孕产妇死亡人数的70%,这一数字为一场以证据为基础的区域运动提供了理由,以放松限制性堕胎法。反堕胎活动人士对此的反应是,努力对科学共识提出质疑,即可获得的合法堕胎可以挽救生命。他们制造的错误信息为堕胎限制(包括将其定为刑事犯罪)辩护,这加剧了孕产妇死亡率和发病率,通过限制妇女的生殖权利破坏了性别平等,并加剧了风险,特别是对年轻、农村、未婚和贫困妇女。作为一名研究全球反堕胎策略的人类学家和一名分别在马拉维从事产科和妇科工作的内科人类学家,我们写这篇文章是为了找出堕胎反对者最近发表的欺骗性策略,并揭穿他们的虚假言论。我们的目标是让那些关心降低孕产妇死亡率的读者——无论他们对堕胎的道德观点如何——做好认识和驳斥错误信息的准备。最后,我们对研究人员如何超越意识形态分歧来改善孕产妇健康提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Debunking misinformation about abortion-related maternal mortality in Africa.

An emerging body of literature misinterprets and misrepresents the scholarship on African maternal mortality to advance the political agenda of anti-abortion advocates. The African region accounts for 70% of global maternal deaths, a figure that has justified a regional, evidence-based movement to loosen restrictive abortion laws. Anti-abortion activists have reacted by working to cast doubt on the scientific consensus that accessible legal abortion saves lives. The misinformation they produce justifies abortion restrictions—including criminalization—that worsen maternal mortality and morbidity, undermine gender equity by constraining women's reproductive rights, and exacerbate risks especially for young, rural, unmarried, and poor women. As an anthropologist who studies global anti-abortion strategies and a physician-anthropologist who has practiced obstetrics and gynecology in Malawi, respectively, we write to identify the deceptive tactics and debunk the false claims featured in recent publications by abortion opponents. Our goal is to prepare readers who care about reducing maternal mortality—no matter their moral perspectives on abortion—to recognize and refute misinformation. We conclude with suggestions for how researchers might move beyond ideological disagreements to improve maternal health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Public Health
Global Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Global Public Health is an essential peer-reviewed journal that energetically engages with key public health issues that have come to the fore in the global environment — mounting inequalities between rich and poor; the globalization of trade; new patterns of travel and migration; epidemics of newly-emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases; the HIV/AIDS pandemic; the increase in chronic illnesses; escalating pressure on public health infrastructures around the world; and the growing range and scale of conflict situations, terrorist threats, environmental pressures, natural and human-made disasters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信