K Sonnichsen, P-E Isberg, J Elers, M Zaigham, Nana Wiberg
{"title":"PLUS研究:三氯生包被缝线(VicrylPlus®)减少分娩相关会阴撕裂初级缝线感染的疗效-一项随机对照试验。","authors":"K Sonnichsen, P-E Isberg, J Elers, M Zaigham, Nana Wiberg","doi":"10.1186/s40748-025-00211-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preventing infection in primary sutured perineal tears after childbirth is crucial to avoid systemic antibiotic use and potential complications from poor healing. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of an antibacterial, triclosan-coated suture (VicrylPlus<sup>®</sup>) in reducing infection in primary sutured childbirth-related perineal tears.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PLUS study was a single-center, single-blinded, adaptive parallel-group randomized trial conducted at Lund University Hospital, Sweden. Women aged ≥ 18 years with a perineal tear at childbirth were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the control group (conventional-absorbable suture, Vicryl<sup>®</sup>) or the intervention group (triclosan-coated- absorbable suture, VicrylPlus<sup>®</sup>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1921 eligible women, 1890 were randomized to either Vicryl<sup>®</sup> (n = 953) or VicrylPlus<sup>®</sup> (n = 937). There were no significant demographic differences between the groups. The most common type of tear in both groups was a second-degree tear (Vicryl<sup>®</sup> 66.2% (n = 625), VicrylPlus<sup>®</sup> 67.5% (n = 625)). Encompassing all types of deeper tears in the analysis there was a significantly decrease in infection after suturing with VicrylPlus<sup>®</sup> 4% (n = 28) versus Vicryl<sup>®</sup> 6.8% (n = 47); (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.35-0.91, P = 0.024). When analyzing different tears separately, there was a non-significant increase in infection for first-degree tears with VicrylPlus<sup>®</sup> 0.8% (n = 2) versus Vicryl<sup>®</sup> 3.9% (n = 8); (OR 4.75, 95% CI 1.00-22.63, P = 0.050). However, for second-degree tears, the infection rate was significantly reduced with VicrylPlus<sup>®</sup> 4.4% (n = 27) versus Vicryl<sup>®</sup> 7.2% (n = 44); (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.36-0.98, P = 0.05) and for third-degree and unclassified tears there was a non-significant decrease in infections with VicrylPlus<sup>®</sup> 5.3% (n = 1) versus Vicryl<sup>®</sup> 14.3% (n = 2); (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.03-4.10, P = 0.561), respectively, VicrylPlus<sup>®</sup> 0% versus Vicryl<sup>®</sup> 1.7% (n = 1); (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.02, P = 0.462).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of triclosan coated sutures significantly reduces the risk of infection in primary sutured childbirth-related perineal tears by 43%, except for first-degree tears. Further research is needed to determine whether their effectiveness remains consistent across the other specific types of deeper tears in a larger study population.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials (NCT02863874), posted 11/08/2016, retrospectively registered. Approved by the regional ethical committee before start of enrollment (Dnr 2015/774).</p>","PeriodicalId":74120,"journal":{"name":"Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology","volume":"11 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12051262/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The PLUS study: efficacy of triclosan coated suture (VicrylPlus<sup>®</sup>) to reduce infection in primary suture of childbirth related perineal tears - a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"K Sonnichsen, P-E Isberg, J Elers, M Zaigham, Nana Wiberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40748-025-00211-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preventing infection in primary sutured perineal tears after childbirth is crucial to avoid systemic antibiotic use and potential complications from poor healing. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of an antibacterial, triclosan-coated suture (VicrylPlus<sup>®</sup>) in reducing infection in primary sutured childbirth-related perineal tears.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PLUS study was a single-center, single-blinded, adaptive parallel-group randomized trial conducted at Lund University Hospital, Sweden. Women aged ≥ 18 years with a perineal tear at childbirth were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the control group (conventional-absorbable suture, Vicryl<sup>®</sup>) or the intervention group (triclosan-coated- absorbable suture, VicrylPlus<sup>®</sup>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1921 eligible women, 1890 were randomized to either Vicryl<sup>®</sup> (n = 953) or VicrylPlus<sup>®</sup> (n = 937). There were no significant demographic differences between the groups. The most common type of tear in both groups was a second-degree tear (Vicryl<sup>®</sup> 66.2% (n = 625), VicrylPlus<sup>®</sup> 67.5% (n = 625)). Encompassing all types of deeper tears in the analysis there was a significantly decrease in infection after suturing with VicrylPlus<sup>®</sup> 4% (n = 28) versus Vicryl<sup>®</sup> 6.8% (n = 47); (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.35-0.91, P = 0.024). When analyzing different tears separately, there was a non-significant increase in infection for first-degree tears with VicrylPlus<sup>®</sup> 0.8% (n = 2) versus Vicryl<sup>®</sup> 3.9% (n = 8); (OR 4.75, 95% CI 1.00-22.63, P = 0.050). However, for second-degree tears, the infection rate was significantly reduced with VicrylPlus<sup>®</sup> 4.4% (n = 27) versus Vicryl<sup>®</sup> 7.2% (n = 44); (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.36-0.98, P = 0.05) and for third-degree and unclassified tears there was a non-significant decrease in infections with VicrylPlus<sup>®</sup> 5.3% (n = 1) versus Vicryl<sup>®</sup> 14.3% (n = 2); (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.03-4.10, P = 0.561), respectively, VicrylPlus<sup>®</sup> 0% versus Vicryl<sup>®</sup> 1.7% (n = 1); (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.02, P = 0.462).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of triclosan coated sutures significantly reduces the risk of infection in primary sutured childbirth-related perineal tears by 43%, except for first-degree tears. Further research is needed to determine whether their effectiveness remains consistent across the other specific types of deeper tears in a larger study population.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials (NCT02863874), posted 11/08/2016, retrospectively registered. Approved by the regional ethical committee before start of enrollment (Dnr 2015/774).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12051262/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40748-025-00211-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40748-025-00211-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:预防分娩后会阴初次缝合撕裂感染是避免全身性抗生素使用和愈合不良潜在并发症的关键。本研究旨在探讨抗菌三氯生包被缝线(VicrylPlus®)在减少初次缝合的分娩相关会阴撕裂感染中的作用。方法:PLUS研究是一项在瑞典隆德大学医院进行的单中心、单盲、适应性平行组随机试验。年龄≥18岁分娩时会阴撕裂的妇女按1:1的比例随机分配到对照组(常规可吸收缝合线,Vicryl®)或干预组(三氯生包被可吸收缝合线,VicrylPlus®)。结果:在1921名符合条件的女性中,1890名被随机分配到Vicryl®(n = 953)或VicrylPlus®(n = 937)。两组之间没有显著的人口统计学差异。两组中最常见的撕裂类型是二度撕裂(Vicryl®66.2% (n = 625), VicrylPlus®67.5% (n = 625))。在分析中,包括所有类型的深层撕裂,VicrylPlus®缝合后感染显著降低4% (n = 28),而Vicryl®为6.8% (n = 47);(or 0.57, 95% ci 0.35-0.91, p = 0.024)。当分别分析不同的泪液时,VicrylPlus®的一级泪液感染无显著增加,为0.8% (n = 2),而Vicryl®为3.9% (n = 8);(or 4.75, 95% ci 1.00-22.63, p = 0.050)。然而,对于二度撕裂,VicrylPlus®的感染率显著降低,为4.4% (n = 27),而Vicryl®为7.2% (n = 44);(OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.36-0.98, P = 0.05),对于三度泪液和未分类泪液,VicrylPlus®的感染率无显著降低5.3% (n = 1),而Vicryl®的感染率为14.3% (n = 2);(OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.03-4.10, P = 0.561), VicrylPlus®0% vs Vicryl®1.7% (n = 1);(or 0.98, 95% ci 0.95-1.02, p = 0.462)。结论:除一级撕裂外,使用三氯生包覆缝线可使原发性分娩相关会阴撕裂感染风险降低43%。需要进一步的研究来确定它们的有效性是否在更大的研究人群中对其他特定类型的深层撕裂保持一致。试验注册:ClinicalTrials (NCT02863874),发布于2016年8月11日,回顾性注册。在入学前由区域伦理委员会批准(Dnr 2015/774)。
The PLUS study: efficacy of triclosan coated suture (VicrylPlus®) to reduce infection in primary suture of childbirth related perineal tears - a randomized controlled trial.
Background: Preventing infection in primary sutured perineal tears after childbirth is crucial to avoid systemic antibiotic use and potential complications from poor healing. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of an antibacterial, triclosan-coated suture (VicrylPlus®) in reducing infection in primary sutured childbirth-related perineal tears.
Methods: The PLUS study was a single-center, single-blinded, adaptive parallel-group randomized trial conducted at Lund University Hospital, Sweden. Women aged ≥ 18 years with a perineal tear at childbirth were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the control group (conventional-absorbable suture, Vicryl®) or the intervention group (triclosan-coated- absorbable suture, VicrylPlus®).
Results: Out of 1921 eligible women, 1890 were randomized to either Vicryl® (n = 953) or VicrylPlus® (n = 937). There were no significant demographic differences between the groups. The most common type of tear in both groups was a second-degree tear (Vicryl® 66.2% (n = 625), VicrylPlus® 67.5% (n = 625)). Encompassing all types of deeper tears in the analysis there was a significantly decrease in infection after suturing with VicrylPlus® 4% (n = 28) versus Vicryl® 6.8% (n = 47); (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.35-0.91, P = 0.024). When analyzing different tears separately, there was a non-significant increase in infection for first-degree tears with VicrylPlus® 0.8% (n = 2) versus Vicryl® 3.9% (n = 8); (OR 4.75, 95% CI 1.00-22.63, P = 0.050). However, for second-degree tears, the infection rate was significantly reduced with VicrylPlus® 4.4% (n = 27) versus Vicryl® 7.2% (n = 44); (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.36-0.98, P = 0.05) and for third-degree and unclassified tears there was a non-significant decrease in infections with VicrylPlus® 5.3% (n = 1) versus Vicryl® 14.3% (n = 2); (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.03-4.10, P = 0.561), respectively, VicrylPlus® 0% versus Vicryl® 1.7% (n = 1); (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.02, P = 0.462).
Conclusion: The use of triclosan coated sutures significantly reduces the risk of infection in primary sutured childbirth-related perineal tears by 43%, except for first-degree tears. Further research is needed to determine whether their effectiveness remains consistent across the other specific types of deeper tears in a larger study population.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials (NCT02863874), posted 11/08/2016, retrospectively registered. Approved by the regional ethical committee before start of enrollment (Dnr 2015/774).