Liveborn应用程序的临床前可用性评估:一个为新生儿复苏提供反馈的移动健康应用程序。

IF 7.7
PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2025-04-23 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000814
Daniel Ishoso, Eric Mafuta, Kourtney Bettinger, Carl Bose, Benjamin H Chi, Ingunn Haug, Patricia Gomez, Joar Eilevstjønn, Abigail McRea, Helge Myklebust, Antoinette Tshefu, Jackie K Patterson
{"title":"Liveborn应用程序的临床前可用性评估:一个为新生儿复苏提供反馈的移动健康应用程序。","authors":"Daniel Ishoso, Eric Mafuta, Kourtney Bettinger, Carl Bose, Benjamin H Chi, Ingunn Haug, Patricia Gomez, Joar Eilevstjønn, Abigail McRea, Helge Myklebust, Antoinette Tshefu, Jackie K Patterson","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neonatal mortality, particularly due to failure to breathe at birth, remains a significant challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Effective neonatal resuscitation is essential to improving survival, but is challenging to implement consistently at the bedside. The Liveborn mobile health application for newborn resuscitation was developed to provide real-time guidance and support debriefing for healthcare workers in LMICs. Liveborn allows an observer to document the timing of key actions during a resuscitation; it then compares the observer data to recommended care and provides data-driven feedback. This study aimed to evaluate the usability of Liveborn in simulated resuscitations. We conducted two rounds of simulated resuscitations using Liveborn with midwives at one health facility in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Each round included ten simulations, with half testing real-time guidance and half focusing on debriefing. Between rounds, Liveborn was iteratively refined based on analysis of video-recordings of the simulations and participant surveys. Midwives' perceptions of usability and feasibility were assessed using previously validated survey tools including the System Usability Scale (SUS) with a score >68 considered above average, and the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) with a score >12 considered above neutral. Round 1 of testing identified several key usability issues including difficulty accurately recording events, poor adherence to audio guidance that was insufficiently specific, and poor flow of debriefing for intrapartum stillbirth cases. The Liveborn app, after iterative refinement, demonstrated excellent usability (median SUS score of 90 [Q1, Q3: 85, 95]) and excellent feasibility (median FIM score of 19 [16, 20]). Further research is needed to assess Liveborn's effectiveness in real clinical settings and its impact on neonatal outcomes in LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 4","pages":"e0000814"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12017530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preclinical usability evaluation of the Liveborn app: A mobile health application that provides feedback for neonatal resuscitation.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Ishoso, Eric Mafuta, Kourtney Bettinger, Carl Bose, Benjamin H Chi, Ingunn Haug, Patricia Gomez, Joar Eilevstjønn, Abigail McRea, Helge Myklebust, Antoinette Tshefu, Jackie K Patterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Neonatal mortality, particularly due to failure to breathe at birth, remains a significant challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Effective neonatal resuscitation is essential to improving survival, but is challenging to implement consistently at the bedside. The Liveborn mobile health application for newborn resuscitation was developed to provide real-time guidance and support debriefing for healthcare workers in LMICs. Liveborn allows an observer to document the timing of key actions during a resuscitation; it then compares the observer data to recommended care and provides data-driven feedback. This study aimed to evaluate the usability of Liveborn in simulated resuscitations. We conducted two rounds of simulated resuscitations using Liveborn with midwives at one health facility in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Each round included ten simulations, with half testing real-time guidance and half focusing on debriefing. Between rounds, Liveborn was iteratively refined based on analysis of video-recordings of the simulations and participant surveys. Midwives' perceptions of usability and feasibility were assessed using previously validated survey tools including the System Usability Scale (SUS) with a score >68 considered above average, and the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) with a score >12 considered above neutral. Round 1 of testing identified several key usability issues including difficulty accurately recording events, poor adherence to audio guidance that was insufficiently specific, and poor flow of debriefing for intrapartum stillbirth cases. The Liveborn app, after iterative refinement, demonstrated excellent usability (median SUS score of 90 [Q1, Q3: 85, 95]) and excellent feasibility (median FIM score of 19 [16, 20]). Further research is needed to assess Liveborn's effectiveness in real clinical settings and its impact on neonatal outcomes in LMICs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"e0000814\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12017530/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000814\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新生儿死亡率,特别是由于出生时呼吸困难造成的死亡率,仍然是低收入和中等收入国家面临的一个重大挑战。有效的新生儿复苏对提高存活率至关重要,但在床边持续实施具有挑战性。开发了用于新生儿复苏的Liveborn移动保健应用程序,以便为中低收入国家的保健工作者提供实时指导和支持汇报。Liveborn允许观察者记录复苏过程中关键动作的时间;然后,它将观察者的数据与建议的护理进行比较,并提供数据驱动的反馈。本研究旨在评估Liveborn在模拟复苏中的可用性。我们在刚果民主共和国的一家医疗机构与助产士一起使用Liveborn进行了两轮模拟复苏。每轮包括10个模拟,一半测试实时制导,一半专注于汇报。在两轮之间,Liveborn根据模拟视频记录和参与者调查的分析进行了迭代改进。使用先前验证的调查工具评估助产士对可用性和可行性的看法,包括系统可用性量表(SUS),得分>68被认为高于平均水平,干预措施(FIM)的可行性得分>12被认为高于中性。第一轮测试确定了几个关键的可用性问题,包括难以准确记录事件,对不够具体的音频指导的依从性差,以及对产时死产病例的汇报流程差。Liveborn应用程序经过反复改进,显示出出色的可用性(SUS得分中位数为90 [Q1, Q3: 85, 95])和出色的可行性(FIM得分中位数为19[16,20])。需要进一步的研究来评估Liveborn在实际临床环境中的有效性及其对低收入国家新生儿结局的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preclinical usability evaluation of the Liveborn app: A mobile health application that provides feedback for neonatal resuscitation.

Neonatal mortality, particularly due to failure to breathe at birth, remains a significant challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Effective neonatal resuscitation is essential to improving survival, but is challenging to implement consistently at the bedside. The Liveborn mobile health application for newborn resuscitation was developed to provide real-time guidance and support debriefing for healthcare workers in LMICs. Liveborn allows an observer to document the timing of key actions during a resuscitation; it then compares the observer data to recommended care and provides data-driven feedback. This study aimed to evaluate the usability of Liveborn in simulated resuscitations. We conducted two rounds of simulated resuscitations using Liveborn with midwives at one health facility in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Each round included ten simulations, with half testing real-time guidance and half focusing on debriefing. Between rounds, Liveborn was iteratively refined based on analysis of video-recordings of the simulations and participant surveys. Midwives' perceptions of usability and feasibility were assessed using previously validated survey tools including the System Usability Scale (SUS) with a score >68 considered above average, and the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) with a score >12 considered above neutral. Round 1 of testing identified several key usability issues including difficulty accurately recording events, poor adherence to audio guidance that was insufficiently specific, and poor flow of debriefing for intrapartum stillbirth cases. The Liveborn app, after iterative refinement, demonstrated excellent usability (median SUS score of 90 [Q1, Q3: 85, 95]) and excellent feasibility (median FIM score of 19 [16, 20]). Further research is needed to assess Liveborn's effectiveness in real clinical settings and its impact on neonatal outcomes in LMICs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信