{"title":"2型糖尿病患者从全科医生转诊到糖尿病专科医生的原因:一项横断面观察研究。","authors":"Antonin Ludinard, Jan Chrusciel, Stephane Sanchez","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02809-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes is a global public health concern. The follow-up of patients with diabetes is often undertaken by general practitioners (GPs), but referral rates to specialists show variations. The primary objective of this study was to describe the factors associated with the referral of type 2 diabetes patients from GPs to diabetes specialists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational survey-based cross-sectional study was conducted with GPs practicing in France between 17 May 2023 and 13 July 2023. Physician characteristics, referral rate and attitudes towards referral were collected. Characteristics associated with frequent referrals were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 325 GPs located in 52 departments (mean age 43 years) responded to the questionnaire. Most responding GPs were women (63%). Most GPs (76%) stated that they rarely or never referred their patients with type 2 diabetes to a diabetes specialist. The most frequent barrier to referral was delays in accessing a specialist (57%), and it was often cited both in the infrequent referral group (56%) and the frequent referral group (58%). In multivariable analysis, higher referral rates were associated with physician age (Odds Ratio OR per year 1.04, 95% Confidence Interval CI 1.01 to 1.07), diabetes care network membership (OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.15 to 6.88), referrals motivated by the introduction of insulin therapy (OR 2.73, 95%CI 1.44 to 5.34) or to consolidate communication about therapeutics and compliance (OR 2.34, 95%CI 1.18 to 4.67), expecting advice regarding new medication such as SGLT-2 inhibitors (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.98), and the mention of patient refusal as one of the main barriers to referral (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.38) were associated with higher referral rates. Conversely, doubts about the added value of the diabetes specialist was associated with infrequent referrals (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.66).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These factors indicate a possible role for lasting professional relationships, where trust built over shared network memberships and years of practice can facilitate referrals. Newly established GPs may find it beneficial to contact specialists in their region to discuss referral procedures. This could facilitate the referral of patients and improve access to specialist care.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11987207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Referral reasons of type 2 diabetes patients from general practitioners to diabetes specialists: a cross-sectional observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Antonin Ludinard, Jan Chrusciel, Stephane Sanchez\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12875-025-02809-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes is a global public health concern. The follow-up of patients with diabetes is often undertaken by general practitioners (GPs), but referral rates to specialists show variations. The primary objective of this study was to describe the factors associated with the referral of type 2 diabetes patients from GPs to diabetes specialists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational survey-based cross-sectional study was conducted with GPs practicing in France between 17 May 2023 and 13 July 2023. Physician characteristics, referral rate and attitudes towards referral were collected. Characteristics associated with frequent referrals were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 325 GPs located in 52 departments (mean age 43 years) responded to the questionnaire. Most responding GPs were women (63%). Most GPs (76%) stated that they rarely or never referred their patients with type 2 diabetes to a diabetes specialist. The most frequent barrier to referral was delays in accessing a specialist (57%), and it was often cited both in the infrequent referral group (56%) and the frequent referral group (58%). In multivariable analysis, higher referral rates were associated with physician age (Odds Ratio OR per year 1.04, 95% Confidence Interval CI 1.01 to 1.07), diabetes care network membership (OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.15 to 6.88), referrals motivated by the introduction of insulin therapy (OR 2.73, 95%CI 1.44 to 5.34) or to consolidate communication about therapeutics and compliance (OR 2.34, 95%CI 1.18 to 4.67), expecting advice regarding new medication such as SGLT-2 inhibitors (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.98), and the mention of patient refusal as one of the main barriers to referral (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.38) were associated with higher referral rates. Conversely, doubts about the added value of the diabetes specialist was associated with infrequent referrals (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.66).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These factors indicate a possible role for lasting professional relationships, where trust built over shared network memberships and years of practice can facilitate referrals. Newly established GPs may find it beneficial to contact specialists in their region to discuss referral procedures. This could facilitate the referral of patients and improve access to specialist care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC primary care\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11987207/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC primary care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02809-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02809-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:糖尿病是一个全球性的公共卫生问题。糖尿病患者的随访通常由全科医生(全科医生)进行,但转诊到专科医生的比率有所不同。本研究的主要目的是描述2型糖尿病患者从全科医生转介到糖尿病专家的相关因素。方法:对2023年5月17日至2023年7月13日在法国执业的全科医生进行了一项基于观察性调查的横断面研究。收集医师特点、转诊率及对转诊的态度。使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估与频繁转诊相关的特征。结果:52个科室共325名全科医生参与问卷调查,平均年龄43岁。大多数回复的全科医生是女性(63%)。大多数全科医生(76%)表示,他们很少或从未将2型糖尿病患者转介给糖尿病专家。最常见的转诊障碍是找专家的时间延迟(57%),这在不经常转诊组(56%)和经常转诊组(58%)中都经常被提及。在多变量分析中,较高的转诊率与医生年龄(比值比OR每年1.04,95%置信区间CI 1.01至1.07)、糖尿病护理网络成员资格(比值比OR 2.81, 95%CI 1.15至6.88)、因引入胰岛素治疗而转诊(比值比OR 2.73, 95%CI 1.44至5.34)、加强治疗和依从性沟通(比值比OR 2.34, 95%CI 1.18至4.67)、期待关于SGLT-2抑制剂等新药物的建议(比值比OR 2.08, 95%CI 1.01至1.07)相关。95% CI 1.11至3.98),提及患者拒绝作为转诊的主要障碍之一(OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.03至3.38)与较高的转诊率相关。相反,对糖尿病专家的附加值的怀疑与不频繁转诊相关(OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 ~ 0.66)。结论:这些因素表明了持久的专业关系的可能作用,其中信任建立在共享的网络成员和多年的实践可以促进转诊。新成立的全科医生可能会发现联系他们地区的专家讨论转诊程序是有益的。这可以促进病人转诊,改善获得专科护理的机会。
Referral reasons of type 2 diabetes patients from general practitioners to diabetes specialists: a cross-sectional observational study.
Background: Diabetes is a global public health concern. The follow-up of patients with diabetes is often undertaken by general practitioners (GPs), but referral rates to specialists show variations. The primary objective of this study was to describe the factors associated with the referral of type 2 diabetes patients from GPs to diabetes specialists.
Methods: An observational survey-based cross-sectional study was conducted with GPs practicing in France between 17 May 2023 and 13 July 2023. Physician characteristics, referral rate and attitudes towards referral were collected. Characteristics associated with frequent referrals were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression model.
Results: A total of 325 GPs located in 52 departments (mean age 43 years) responded to the questionnaire. Most responding GPs were women (63%). Most GPs (76%) stated that they rarely or never referred their patients with type 2 diabetes to a diabetes specialist. The most frequent barrier to referral was delays in accessing a specialist (57%), and it was often cited both in the infrequent referral group (56%) and the frequent referral group (58%). In multivariable analysis, higher referral rates were associated with physician age (Odds Ratio OR per year 1.04, 95% Confidence Interval CI 1.01 to 1.07), diabetes care network membership (OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.15 to 6.88), referrals motivated by the introduction of insulin therapy (OR 2.73, 95%CI 1.44 to 5.34) or to consolidate communication about therapeutics and compliance (OR 2.34, 95%CI 1.18 to 4.67), expecting advice regarding new medication such as SGLT-2 inhibitors (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.98), and the mention of patient refusal as one of the main barriers to referral (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.38) were associated with higher referral rates. Conversely, doubts about the added value of the diabetes specialist was associated with infrequent referrals (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.66).
Conclusions: These factors indicate a possible role for lasting professional relationships, where trust built over shared network memberships and years of practice can facilitate referrals. Newly established GPs may find it beneficial to contact specialists in their region to discuss referral procedures. This could facilitate the referral of patients and improve access to specialist care.