阿拉伯语版短肌肉骨骼功能评估问卷的跨文化适应、效度和信度。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Mohamed Abdelmegeed, Sara Yahya, Aya El-Razaz, Elsadat Saad Soliman
{"title":"阿拉伯语版短肌肉骨骼功能评估问卷的跨文化适应、效度和信度。","authors":"Mohamed Abdelmegeed, Sara Yahya, Aya El-Razaz, Elsadat Saad Soliman","doi":"10.1177/10538127251325425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe evaluation and intervention process of musculoskeletal disorders necessitates the assessment of functional disabilities. An Arabic version of the short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire (SMFA) is unavailable and necessary to be delivered.ObjectiveTo cross-culturally adapt the SMFA into the Arabic language (SMFA-AR) and then to examine its measurement properties.MethodsFour hundred and forty-six patients with a mean age of 40.99 ± 11.74 were recruited through direct referrals. The translation process was performed using published guidelines. Patients were asked to fill out the SMFA-AR twice within a 2-7-day interval for the reliability assessment which was calculated using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for test-retest and by using Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency. Construct and concurrent validity were tested by calculating the Pearson's correlation coefficient between the SMFA-AR, the Arabic version of the quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH-AR), the Arabic Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS- Arabic), the Arabic version of the European quality of life questionnaire (EQ-5D- AR), and the Arabic numeric pain rating scale (NPRS-AR).ResultsThe SMFA-AR showed excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = .988) and excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89). The standard error of measurement (SEM) and the minimal detectable change (MDC<sub>95</sub>) values were 1.419 and 3.933 respectively. On the other hand, the SMFA-AR showed a weak to moderate construct and concurrent validity with the quick DASH-AR, LEFS-AR, EQ-5D-AR, and NPRS-AR (r = 0.56, -0.24, -0.58, 0.31 respectively). There was no floor or ceiling effect for the SMFA-Ar. All the reported P values were less than 0.01ConclusionRegarding test-retest reliability and internal consistency, an excellent result was reported by the newly adapted SMFA-AR. Additionally, a weak to moderate construct and concurrent validity was found. It is advised to use the newly adapted SMFA-AR with Arabic-speaking patients having different musculoskeletal dysfunctions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127251325425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the arabic version of the short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Abdelmegeed, Sara Yahya, Aya El-Razaz, Elsadat Saad Soliman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10538127251325425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundThe evaluation and intervention process of musculoskeletal disorders necessitates the assessment of functional disabilities. An Arabic version of the short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire (SMFA) is unavailable and necessary to be delivered.ObjectiveTo cross-culturally adapt the SMFA into the Arabic language (SMFA-AR) and then to examine its measurement properties.MethodsFour hundred and forty-six patients with a mean age of 40.99 ± 11.74 were recruited through direct referrals. The translation process was performed using published guidelines. Patients were asked to fill out the SMFA-AR twice within a 2-7-day interval for the reliability assessment which was calculated using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for test-retest and by using Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency. Construct and concurrent validity were tested by calculating the Pearson's correlation coefficient between the SMFA-AR, the Arabic version of the quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH-AR), the Arabic Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS- Arabic), the Arabic version of the European quality of life questionnaire (EQ-5D- AR), and the Arabic numeric pain rating scale (NPRS-AR).ResultsThe SMFA-AR showed excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = .988) and excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89). The standard error of measurement (SEM) and the minimal detectable change (MDC<sub>95</sub>) values were 1.419 and 3.933 respectively. On the other hand, the SMFA-AR showed a weak to moderate construct and concurrent validity with the quick DASH-AR, LEFS-AR, EQ-5D-AR, and NPRS-AR (r = 0.56, -0.24, -0.58, 0.31 respectively). There was no floor or ceiling effect for the SMFA-Ar. All the reported P values were less than 0.01ConclusionRegarding test-retest reliability and internal consistency, an excellent result was reported by the newly adapted SMFA-AR. Additionally, a weak to moderate construct and concurrent validity was found. It is advised to use the newly adapted SMFA-AR with Arabic-speaking patients having different musculoskeletal dysfunctions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10538127251325425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251325425\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251325425","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景肌肉骨骼疾病的评估和干预过程需要对功能障碍进行评估。阿拉伯语版本的短肌肉骨骼功能评估问卷(SMFA)是不可用的,有必要交付。目的对阿拉伯语的SMFA (SMFA- ar)进行跨文化改编,并检验其测量特性。方法直接转诊入组患者446例,平均年龄40.99±11.74岁。翻译过程是根据已发布的指南进行的。患者被要求在2-7天的间隔内填写两次SMFA-AR以进行信度评估,信度评估采用类内相关系数(ICC)进行重测,采用Cronbach's alpha进行内部一致性评估。通过计算SMFA-AR、阿拉伯版手臂、肩膀和手的快速残疾(quick DASH-AR)、阿拉伯下肢功能量表(LEFS- arab)、阿拉伯版欧洲生活质量问卷(EQ-5D- AR)和阿拉伯数字疼痛评定量表(NPRS-AR)之间的Pearson相关系数来检验结构和并发效度。结果SMFA-AR具有良好的重测信度(ICC = .988)和良好的内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.89)。测量标准误差(SEM)和最小可检测变化(MDC95)值分别为1.419和3.933。SMFA-AR与快速DASH-AR、LEFS-AR、EQ-5D-AR、NPRS-AR具有弱至中等的构效度和并发效度(r分别为0.56、-0.24、-0.58、0.31)。SMFA-Ar没有下限或上限效应。结论在重测信度和内部一致性方面,新采用的SMFA-AR具有较好的结果。此外,还发现了弱到中等的构念和并发效度。建议对患有不同肌肉骨骼功能障碍的阿拉伯语患者使用新适应的SMFA-AR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-Cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the arabic version of the short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire.

BackgroundThe evaluation and intervention process of musculoskeletal disorders necessitates the assessment of functional disabilities. An Arabic version of the short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire (SMFA) is unavailable and necessary to be delivered.ObjectiveTo cross-culturally adapt the SMFA into the Arabic language (SMFA-AR) and then to examine its measurement properties.MethodsFour hundred and forty-six patients with a mean age of 40.99 ± 11.74 were recruited through direct referrals. The translation process was performed using published guidelines. Patients were asked to fill out the SMFA-AR twice within a 2-7-day interval for the reliability assessment which was calculated using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for test-retest and by using Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency. Construct and concurrent validity were tested by calculating the Pearson's correlation coefficient between the SMFA-AR, the Arabic version of the quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH-AR), the Arabic Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS- Arabic), the Arabic version of the European quality of life questionnaire (EQ-5D- AR), and the Arabic numeric pain rating scale (NPRS-AR).ResultsThe SMFA-AR showed excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = .988) and excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89). The standard error of measurement (SEM) and the minimal detectable change (MDC95) values were 1.419 and 3.933 respectively. On the other hand, the SMFA-AR showed a weak to moderate construct and concurrent validity with the quick DASH-AR, LEFS-AR, EQ-5D-AR, and NPRS-AR (r = 0.56, -0.24, -0.58, 0.31 respectively). There was no floor or ceiling effect for the SMFA-Ar. All the reported P values were less than 0.01ConclusionRegarding test-retest reliability and internal consistency, an excellent result was reported by the newly adapted SMFA-AR. Additionally, a weak to moderate construct and concurrent validity was found. It is advised to use the newly adapted SMFA-AR with Arabic-speaking patients having different musculoskeletal dysfunctions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信