皮肤科药物开发:治疗年轻患者的挑战。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-21 DOI:10.1080/14656566.2025.2496425
Klaus Rose, Tomoko Maeda-Chubachi, Jane M Grant-Kels
{"title":"皮肤科药物开发:治疗年轻患者的挑战。","authors":"Klaus Rose, Tomoko Maeda-Chubachi, Jane M Grant-Kels","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2025.2496425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Drug development for skin disorders is influenced by the concept of children as 'therapeutic orphans' and is subject to pediatric requirements of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The EMA requires a 'pediatric investigation plan' (PIP) early in development. Healthy newborns' skin is as thick as that of adults. For crisaborole for atopic dermatitis, the FDA accepted pivotal trials involving patients 2-79 years; the EMA accepted this as part of its PIP. In contrast, for psoriasis, PIPs require separate evidence of efficacy and safety in children aged 6-17 years.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Adolescents' skin does not change overnight on their 18th birthday, only the legal status. Most FDA pediatric requirements are grounded in commonsense and reflect current scientific understanding. The EMA, however, continues to take rigid stance in its pediatric demands. PIP negotiations are often lengthy, complex, and frustrating.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Companies must possess a deep understanding of the clinical landscape, considerable patience, and sometimes seek external experts' support. A gap has become wider between US and EU, with the EU increasingly falling behind in drug development.</p>","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"953-960"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug development in dermatology: challenges in treating young patients.\",\"authors\":\"Klaus Rose, Tomoko Maeda-Chubachi, Jane M Grant-Kels\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14656566.2025.2496425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Drug development for skin disorders is influenced by the concept of children as 'therapeutic orphans' and is subject to pediatric requirements of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The EMA requires a 'pediatric investigation plan' (PIP) early in development. Healthy newborns' skin is as thick as that of adults. For crisaborole for atopic dermatitis, the FDA accepted pivotal trials involving patients 2-79 years; the EMA accepted this as part of its PIP. In contrast, for psoriasis, PIPs require separate evidence of efficacy and safety in children aged 6-17 years.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Adolescents' skin does not change overnight on their 18th birthday, only the legal status. Most FDA pediatric requirements are grounded in commonsense and reflect current scientific understanding. The EMA, however, continues to take rigid stance in its pediatric demands. PIP negotiations are often lengthy, complex, and frustrating.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Companies must possess a deep understanding of the clinical landscape, considerable patience, and sometimes seek external experts' support. A gap has become wider between US and EU, with the EU increasingly falling behind in drug development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"953-960\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2025.2496425\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2025.2496425","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:皮肤疾病的药物开发受到儿童作为“治疗孤儿”概念的影响,并受到美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)和欧洲药品管理局(EMA)儿科要求的影响。EMA要求在开发早期制定“儿科调查计划”(PIP)。健康新生儿的皮肤和成年人一样厚。对于治疗特应性皮炎的crisaborole, FDA接受了涉及2-79岁患者的关键性试验;EMA将此作为其PIP的一部分接受。相比之下,对于牛皮癣,pip需要在6-17岁儿童中单独的有效性和安全性证据。覆盖的区域:青少年的皮肤不会在他们18岁生日的一夜之间发生变化,只有法律地位。大多数FDA儿科要求都是基于常识,反映了当前的科学理解。然而,EMA在其儿科需求方面继续采取强硬立场。PIP谈判通常是冗长、复杂和令人沮丧的。专家意见:公司必须对临床前景有深刻的理解,有相当的耐心,有时还需要寻求外部专家的支持。美国和欧盟之间的差距越来越大,欧盟在药物开发方面越来越落后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drug development in dermatology: challenges in treating young patients.

Introduction: Drug development for skin disorders is influenced by the concept of children as 'therapeutic orphans' and is subject to pediatric requirements of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The EMA requires a 'pediatric investigation plan' (PIP) early in development. Healthy newborns' skin is as thick as that of adults. For crisaborole for atopic dermatitis, the FDA accepted pivotal trials involving patients 2-79 years; the EMA accepted this as part of its PIP. In contrast, for psoriasis, PIPs require separate evidence of efficacy and safety in children aged 6-17 years.

Areas covered: Adolescents' skin does not change overnight on their 18th birthday, only the legal status. Most FDA pediatric requirements are grounded in commonsense and reflect current scientific understanding. The EMA, however, continues to take rigid stance in its pediatric demands. PIP negotiations are often lengthy, complex, and frustrating.

Expert opinion: Companies must possess a deep understanding of the clinical landscape, considerable patience, and sometimes seek external experts' support. A gap has become wider between US and EU, with the EU increasingly falling behind in drug development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles and original papers on newly approved/near to launch compounds mainly of chemical/synthetic origin, providing expert opinion on the likely impact of these new agents on existing pharmacotherapy of specific diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信