单节段颈椎间盘置换术后吞咽困难对医疗资源利用的影响。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Paul G Mastrokostas, Leonidas E Mastrokostas, Ahmed K Emara, Jonathan Dalton, Christopher K Kepler, Ahmed Saleh, Jad Bou Monsef, Afshin E Razi, Mitchell K Ng
{"title":"单节段颈椎间盘置换术后吞咽困难对医疗资源利用的影响。","authors":"Paul G Mastrokostas, Leonidas E Mastrokostas, Ahmed K Emara, Jonathan Dalton, Christopher K Kepler, Ahmed Saleh, Jad Bou Monsef, Afshin E Razi, Mitchell K Ng","doi":"10.1177/21925682251334060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesThis study seeks to highlight differences in 1) postoperative complications, 2) recovery course, and 3) associated costs between patients with and without postoperative dysphagia who underwent single-level CDA.MethodsThe National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried to identify patients who underwent single-level CDA between 2016 and 2020. Patients were divided into dysphagia and control groups based on the presence or absence of postoperative dysphagia. Propensity score-matching (1:5) was performed, accounting for age, sex, race, and comorbidities. Primary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), hospital costs, and discharge disposition. Chi-square and t-tests were used for statistical comparisons. Significance was set at the <i>P <</i> .05 level.ResultsThe final analysis included 640 patients in the dysphagia group and 3,200 controls after matching. Patients in the dysphagia group experienced a significantly higher rate of perioperative complications (7.8% vs 2.8%; <i>P</i> = .006). The mean LOS was longer for the dysphagia group (2.9 ± .3 days vs 1.5 ± .1 days; <i>P</i> < .001), and hospitalization costs were significantly higher ($27,100 vs $21,700; <i>P</i> < .001). Additionally, dysphagia patients were more likely to have a non-routine discharge (15.6% vs 9.2%; <i>P</i> = .030).ConclusionsPostoperative dysphagia following CDA significantly escalates healthcare resource utilization, leading to prolonged hospital stays, increased costs, and a greater risk of non-routine discharge. This underscores the need for targeted interventions to reduce the incidence of dysphagia and improve recovery outcomes, ultimately enhancing patient care and reducing the financial burden on healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251334060"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12061896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Postoperative Dysphagia on Health Care Resource Utilization Following Single-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Paul G Mastrokostas, Leonidas E Mastrokostas, Ahmed K Emara, Jonathan Dalton, Christopher K Kepler, Ahmed Saleh, Jad Bou Monsef, Afshin E Razi, Mitchell K Ng\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21925682251334060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesThis study seeks to highlight differences in 1) postoperative complications, 2) recovery course, and 3) associated costs between patients with and without postoperative dysphagia who underwent single-level CDA.MethodsThe National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried to identify patients who underwent single-level CDA between 2016 and 2020. Patients were divided into dysphagia and control groups based on the presence or absence of postoperative dysphagia. Propensity score-matching (1:5) was performed, accounting for age, sex, race, and comorbidities. Primary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), hospital costs, and discharge disposition. Chi-square and t-tests were used for statistical comparisons. Significance was set at the <i>P <</i> .05 level.ResultsThe final analysis included 640 patients in the dysphagia group and 3,200 controls after matching. Patients in the dysphagia group experienced a significantly higher rate of perioperative complications (7.8% vs 2.8%; <i>P</i> = .006). The mean LOS was longer for the dysphagia group (2.9 ± .3 days vs 1.5 ± .1 days; <i>P</i> < .001), and hospitalization costs were significantly higher ($27,100 vs $21,700; <i>P</i> < .001). Additionally, dysphagia patients were more likely to have a non-routine discharge (15.6% vs 9.2%; <i>P</i> = .030).ConclusionsPostoperative dysphagia following CDA significantly escalates healthcare resource utilization, leading to prolonged hospital stays, increased costs, and a greater risk of non-routine discharge. This underscores the need for targeted interventions to reduce the incidence of dysphagia and improve recovery outcomes, ultimately enhancing patient care and reducing the financial burden on healthcare systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"21925682251334060\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12061896/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251334060\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251334060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计回顾性队列研究。目的本研究旨在强调1)术后并发症,2)恢复过程,以及3)接受单级CDA的有和无术后吞咽困难患者的相关费用的差异。方法查询全国住院患者样本(NIS),确定2016年至2020年期间接受单级CDA的患者。根据术后有无吞咽困难将患者分为吞咽困难组和对照组。考虑年龄、性别、种族和合并症,进行倾向评分匹配(1:5)。主要结局包括住院时间(LOS)、住院费用和出院处置。统计学比较采用卡方检验和t检验。显著性水平为0.05。结果最终纳入吞咽困难组640例,对照组3200例。吞咽困难组患者围手术期并发症发生率明显高于吞咽困难组(7.8% vs 2.8%;P = .006)。吞咽困难组的平均生存时间更长(2.9±0.3天vs 1.5±0.1天);P < 0.001),住院费用显著高于(27,100美元vs 21,700美元;P < 0.001)。此外,吞咽困难患者更有可能出现非常规出院(15.6% vs 9.2%;P = .030)。结论CDA术后吞咽困难显著增加了医疗资源的利用,延长了住院时间,增加了费用,增加了非正常出院的风险。这强调了有针对性的干预措施的必要性,以减少吞咽困难的发生率,改善康复结果,最终加强患者护理,减轻医疗保健系统的经济负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Postoperative Dysphagia on Health Care Resource Utilization Following Single-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.

Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesThis study seeks to highlight differences in 1) postoperative complications, 2) recovery course, and 3) associated costs between patients with and without postoperative dysphagia who underwent single-level CDA.MethodsThe National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried to identify patients who underwent single-level CDA between 2016 and 2020. Patients were divided into dysphagia and control groups based on the presence or absence of postoperative dysphagia. Propensity score-matching (1:5) was performed, accounting for age, sex, race, and comorbidities. Primary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), hospital costs, and discharge disposition. Chi-square and t-tests were used for statistical comparisons. Significance was set at the P < .05 level.ResultsThe final analysis included 640 patients in the dysphagia group and 3,200 controls after matching. Patients in the dysphagia group experienced a significantly higher rate of perioperative complications (7.8% vs 2.8%; P = .006). The mean LOS was longer for the dysphagia group (2.9 ± .3 days vs 1.5 ± .1 days; P < .001), and hospitalization costs were significantly higher ($27,100 vs $21,700; P < .001). Additionally, dysphagia patients were more likely to have a non-routine discharge (15.6% vs 9.2%; P = .030).ConclusionsPostoperative dysphagia following CDA significantly escalates healthcare resource utilization, leading to prolonged hospital stays, increased costs, and a greater risk of non-routine discharge. This underscores the need for targeted interventions to reduce the incidence of dysphagia and improve recovery outcomes, ultimately enhancing patient care and reducing the financial burden on healthcare systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信