Liping Wei, Min Hong, Min Lu, Yimin Qian, Qingmei Li, Naping Tang, Hua Li, Yan Chang, Yunliang Qiu
{"title":"康替唑胺(MRX-I)与利奈唑胺在Sprague-Dawley大鼠体内的安全性评价。","authors":"Liping Wei, Min Hong, Min Lu, Yimin Qian, Qingmei Li, Naping Tang, Hua Li, Yan Chang, Yunliang Qiu","doi":"10.1007/s40268-025-00504-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & objectives: </strong>Contezolid (MRX-I) is a novel ortho-fluorophenyl dihydropyridone developed by MicuRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. It has been approved for the treatment of drug-resistant Gram-positive bacterial infections with relatively lower toxicity than other oxazolidinones such as linezolid. However, the toxicity profile has not yet been completely revealed. The aim of this study was to disclose the toxicity of contezolid in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats and compare its toxicity profile with linezolid in a standard 4-week toxicity study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, SD rats were orally administered with contezolid at doses of 20, 100, or 200/300 mg/kg/day for 28 consecutive days followed by a 28-day recovery period. Linezolid at doses of 100 or 200 mg/kg/day served as a comparator. Clinical observations, body weight, food consumption, hematology, clinical chemistry, urinalysis, and histopathological examinations were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All females in the 200 mg/kg/day linezolid group were subjected to unscheduled death due to myelosuppression within the first 2 weeks. No abnormalities were noted in the 200 mg/kg/day contezolid group, and the dose level was escalated to 300 mg/kg/day from day 15. Myelosuppression or myelosuppression-associated effects were comparable between the 300-mg/kg/day contezolid group and the 100-mg/kg/day linezolid group. The 'no observed adverse effect level' (NOAEL) of contezolid was determined to be 100 mg/kg/day (with an average AUC<sub>0-24 h</sub> of 268.4 μg*h/mL). At the same dose levels, the toxicity of contezolid was significantly lower than that of linezolid.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings demonstrate that contezolid exhibits a favorable safety profile compared with linezolid in this 4-week repeated-dose toxicity study in rats.</p>","PeriodicalId":49258,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Research & Development","volume":" ","pages":"127-140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185790/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety Evaluation of Contezolid (MRX-I) Versus Linezolid in Sprague-Dawley Rats.\",\"authors\":\"Liping Wei, Min Hong, Min Lu, Yimin Qian, Qingmei Li, Naping Tang, Hua Li, Yan Chang, Yunliang Qiu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40268-025-00504-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background & objectives: </strong>Contezolid (MRX-I) is a novel ortho-fluorophenyl dihydropyridone developed by MicuRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. It has been approved for the treatment of drug-resistant Gram-positive bacterial infections with relatively lower toxicity than other oxazolidinones such as linezolid. However, the toxicity profile has not yet been completely revealed. The aim of this study was to disclose the toxicity of contezolid in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats and compare its toxicity profile with linezolid in a standard 4-week toxicity study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, SD rats were orally administered with contezolid at doses of 20, 100, or 200/300 mg/kg/day for 28 consecutive days followed by a 28-day recovery period. Linezolid at doses of 100 or 200 mg/kg/day served as a comparator. Clinical observations, body weight, food consumption, hematology, clinical chemistry, urinalysis, and histopathological examinations were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All females in the 200 mg/kg/day linezolid group were subjected to unscheduled death due to myelosuppression within the first 2 weeks. No abnormalities were noted in the 200 mg/kg/day contezolid group, and the dose level was escalated to 300 mg/kg/day from day 15. Myelosuppression or myelosuppression-associated effects were comparable between the 300-mg/kg/day contezolid group and the 100-mg/kg/day linezolid group. The 'no observed adverse effect level' (NOAEL) of contezolid was determined to be 100 mg/kg/day (with an average AUC<sub>0-24 h</sub> of 268.4 μg*h/mL). At the same dose levels, the toxicity of contezolid was significantly lower than that of linezolid.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings demonstrate that contezolid exhibits a favorable safety profile compared with linezolid in this 4-week repeated-dose toxicity study in rats.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs in Research & Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"127-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185790/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs in Research & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-025-00504-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-025-00504-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Safety Evaluation of Contezolid (MRX-I) Versus Linezolid in Sprague-Dawley Rats.
Background & objectives: Contezolid (MRX-I) is a novel ortho-fluorophenyl dihydropyridone developed by MicuRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. It has been approved for the treatment of drug-resistant Gram-positive bacterial infections with relatively lower toxicity than other oxazolidinones such as linezolid. However, the toxicity profile has not yet been completely revealed. The aim of this study was to disclose the toxicity of contezolid in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats and compare its toxicity profile with linezolid in a standard 4-week toxicity study.
Methods: In this study, SD rats were orally administered with contezolid at doses of 20, 100, or 200/300 mg/kg/day for 28 consecutive days followed by a 28-day recovery period. Linezolid at doses of 100 or 200 mg/kg/day served as a comparator. Clinical observations, body weight, food consumption, hematology, clinical chemistry, urinalysis, and histopathological examinations were conducted.
Results: All females in the 200 mg/kg/day linezolid group were subjected to unscheduled death due to myelosuppression within the first 2 weeks. No abnormalities were noted in the 200 mg/kg/day contezolid group, and the dose level was escalated to 300 mg/kg/day from day 15. Myelosuppression or myelosuppression-associated effects were comparable between the 300-mg/kg/day contezolid group and the 100-mg/kg/day linezolid group. The 'no observed adverse effect level' (NOAEL) of contezolid was determined to be 100 mg/kg/day (with an average AUC0-24 h of 268.4 μg*h/mL). At the same dose levels, the toxicity of contezolid was significantly lower than that of linezolid.
Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that contezolid exhibits a favorable safety profile compared with linezolid in this 4-week repeated-dose toxicity study in rats.
期刊介绍:
Drugs in R&D is an international, peer reviewed, open access, online only journal, and provides timely information from all phases of drug research and development that will inform clinical practice. Healthcare decision makers are thus provided with knowledge about the developing place of a drug in therapy.
The Journal includes:
Clinical research on new and established drugs;
Preclinical research of direct relevance to clinical drug development;
Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered;
Reviews may also be considered.